It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by truthseekr1111
Shouting does not make your false claims any more truthful.
Originally posted by stereologist
The problem here is that this entire claim is based on appealing to the ignorant and those want to remain ignorant.
Originally posted by stereologist
There has been no effort made to point out anything important in the video.
Originally posted by stereologist
What I did see int he first few minutes was junk and 2 random stabs at finding something (since no one seems able to point to anything) found completely laughable statements.
Originally posted by stereologist
If all of the text in the video were placed into one spot I doubt there would be more than 3 paragraphs which could be read in a minute. The point of this video is to drag out the lunacy into a painfully long time span. The same is true of many videos on youtube
There are hundreds if not thousands who would DISAGREE with your OPINION... So who cares? No big loss there as it pertains to anything the video claims and presents.
Originally posted by stereologist
If all of the text in the video were placed into one spot I doubt there would be more than 3 paragraphs which could be read in a minute. The point of this video is to drag out the lunacy into a painfully long time span. The same is true of many videos on youtube
You keep making that worthless claim about something you claim is worthless which you've repeatedly failed to even prove or back up with anything other than worthless OPINIONS about a subject you've proven you have no intellectual comprehension of probably due to the fact you've really never actually watched the video.
But then, as one of the responses points out... since the majority of the masses resonate at very low frequencies and prefer subject matter that involves no intelligent thought processes which these video's require, your comments are a typical reflection of the state of ignorance our society is currently in.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by truthseekr1111
The ultimate example of an Oxymoron in the most IRONIC of contexts!
A post without content. This reminds me of the video.
So where is there any content in the video?
Yet another response without any specific question or argument showing exactly how or where the video's present no content. lol
which is probably due to the fact there's nothing wrong with the claims, ideas, or evidence and content presented.
I guess you figured the easy way to make it appear as if there's no content.
To illustrate all this, there is a website created by a smart chap called Tom Scott, and as a piece of satire that mocks all this, I love it. No matter where you are in the UK, you can key in your postcode and it will quickly tell you about the 3 or more ley lines the converge at that point, thus proving you are currently at a hub of “spiritual” power (no need to trek to Stonehenge)
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by truthseekr1111
No problem...... introductory "content" began at :05 seconds and lasted up to the next frames of credits that then began the primary INTRODUCTION laying a foundation for presenting the primary introductory content.
There was nothing in that first part of the video except for some junk about the bad music and that there was no narration.
Originally posted by stereologist
you seem to have the only opinion that anything in the video was a waste... especially the TIME & INTRO.
That is a fallacy. You have no way of knowing that. Then again if you think there is content in the video I am not surprised by this illogical conclusion.
Originally posted by stereologist
What would be the point of answering your question when you refuse to watch past the opening credits or introduction?
I stopped watching the video because I consider my time valuable. If there were any content you could say something like at mm:ss the folloowing is described.
Originally posted by stereologist
>how would you know that if you refuse to watch past the opening credits or introduction?
Why are you unable to point out any content to a video? Not everyone has high speed internet. Not everyone can wait an hour or more for the video to download. Some people have to pay by megs downloaded. The video may be too pricey to do on a whim.
Originally posted by stereologist
If I were to do that, I'd probably gloss over important context that you'd be asking questions about or complaining makes no sense. So what would the point be to debate material out of context? There are many ideas, issues, ample evidence and data presented throughout the videoS that are linked at different intervals as well... So how does one choose/decide which is in your field of interest?
Stop making excuses as to why you can't point out content.
Originally posted by stereologist
Is this because you can't point to the content?
Originally posted by stereologist
When people begin to look back at videos like this they realize how poorly constructed it is and how they fell for some simple graphics and how it is not well done and full of mistakes.
Originally posted by stereologist
That is when there comes the refusal to point out content.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by truthseekr1111
I watched party of that asinine video. There is less than 5minutes of reading, probably 3 minutes of reading. What is there to this video that is useful. The first 3 minutes were valueless. Two random checks in the video showed clear stupidity on the part of the author with issues so wrong it was laughable. I am referring for instance to the idiotic claim of platonic solids being at the root of everything.
Originally posted by stereologist
I'm unclear as to why anyone would pay any attention to such a video. If you think there is anything of value why not post it.
more claims and opinions implying there's no content even though THOUSANDS would disagree with you.
Yawwn
Claiming the video's contain no content etc, is far worse and ridiculous than any such fallacy in the context you're claiming if you've refused to watch the video's to get any context let alone show you know anything
thats been discussed in the video OR EVEN WHAT THE DEFINITION OF CONTENT IS...
FACT, the video is apprx 90 minutes in length which contains ample CONTENT that MOST OBJECTIVE rational people with a half a brain, would agree with; something that can easily be demonstrated with simple research
on the video comments section let alone thousands of pages and tons if not hundreds of sites & forums on the net discussing these videos.
if you stopped watching the video, how would you know there's no content? LOL
the fact you can't even specify an example to prove you've actually watched more than 2 minutes of even one video of 3 that contain an HOUR and a HALF of CONTENT and when THOUSANDS have posted comments praising the CONTENT, makes your OPINION and comments there's no content, all the more laughable if not worthless.
If I didn't know better, I'd say this tactic of yours is a clever way to derail the thread and piss off the mods in an attempt to have it closed (which someone even suggested). lol gawd ur making this obvious man. Pure Genius stereOOOH. Is that in the debunker hand-book as well?
Once again stereo shows the extent of his ignorance and lack of knowledge regarding the subject matter of Sacred Geometry.
oooo yeah sure stereo, whatever you say... we all bow to such supreme wisdom you have to teach the world... Sacred Geometry is just a bunch of Line Drawing or Numerology in "drawn" form!
now that your game here is clear, why would I waste my time when you post such idiotic claims like there's no content and prove you have no real intention to objectively discuss anything presented or the content which it clearly has plenty of? If its your OPINION there is no content and nothing of substance or interest has been presented, then THANKS FOR YOUR OPINION however ignorant and meaningless it is.
The diagram to the right shows an example of lines that pass very near to a set of random points: for all practical purposes, they can be regarded as nearly "exact" alignments. Naturally, it is debated whether all ley lines can be accounted for in this way, or whether there are more such lines than would be expected by chance. (For a mathematical treatment of this topic, see alignments of random points.)
Originally posted by stereologist
Ley lines remind me of the Bermuda triangle. Everyone draws their own lines. The BT was drawn in different places by different authors with some covering nearly the entire northern Atlantic. Ley lines are drawn by people in a whimsical helter skelter manner. Another funny thing are the energy vortex maps sold in Sedona. My favorite wacko place. The map shows a vortex of forgetfulness behind the post office. I'm sure as the town changed the maps have been changed to adjust for new construction.
Originally posted by stereologist
The ley lines drawer often does so on the basis of some subjective notion and makes uneducated claims about the lines such as those in the video.
Originally posted by stereologist
Select enough points on a sphere and the possible lines is large and can be made to cover anything of interest.
Originally posted by stereologist
This of course relies on real science to have collected the data in the first place.
Originally posted by stereologist
Here is a brief write up on the history of ley lines and their dubious nature. It describes the funny notion that the Earth is actually a dodecahedron crystal.
saskskeptics.com...
Originally posted by stereologist
Finding articles on the ridiculous nature of ley lines is oh, so easy.
Here is another write up.
www.skeptical-science.com...
To illustrate all this, there is a website created by a smart chap called Tom Scott, and as a piece of satire that mocks all this, I love it. No matter where you are in the UK, you can key in your postcode and it will quickly tell you about the 3 or more ley lines the converge at that point, thus proving you are currently at a hub of “spiritual” power (no need to trek to Stonehenge)
So here is another write up showing that by selecting sufficient points on a sphere you can make up any grid you want to.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by truthseekr1111
Originally posted by stereologist
I guess you figured the easy way to make it appear as if there's no content.
Pretending is okay in this thread since it is about the asinine idea of ley lines. You are pretending that I did not ask a question. I did. I am asking you, if there is any place in the video with content worth watching.
I already know there is nothing to watch in the first 3 minutes. That is a complete waste of time. I also know there are 2 spots I chose at random that are poppycock as well.
Where is there any content worth watching?
Like WHAT??? /quote]
Like the idiotic claims about plantonic solids. (facepalm inserted)
Sorry, but the issue of the Ley-Lines and whats been claimed and presented, has nothing to do with them "covering" anything in the context you're talking about. Your lack of knowledge about the subject, shows how uneducated you are on whats been presented in the video's.
So what is in the video that is worth watching? A simple question you seem unable to answer.
how does that point relate to or even disprove anything presented in the video? /quote]
Ley line drawers put the cart before the horse. (facepalm inserted)
one of the more poorly written articles on Ley-Lines and posted by someone who has poorly researched the subject and implies the article somehow invalidates SG or anything presented in the video's. But what else would one expect when the article's author is the same type of DEBUNKER like Stereo who already has pre-concieved notions or BIASES to begin with, which prevent them from offering any OBJECTIVE criticism or opinions.
That is your opinion and nothing more. You have repeatedly stated "is nothing more than YOUR OPINION and doesn't prove YOUR claim. "
The article actually contained content and it was read in a matter of minutes. Simple extrapolation suggests it contained 2X the content of the video.
Except the "points" that create the 188 Ley-Line Grid, aren't based on just "any" random points, which alone contradicts your claim.
the article you post is laughable at best, especially as it relates to anything presented in the videos as evidenced by the opening sentence... A theory that was actually REJECTED in the videos having nothing to do with the ley-lines of 188.
the guy who wrote that could probably make serious money selling it as a sleeping pill
Yet another response without any specific question or argument showing exactly how or where the video's present no content. lol
which is probably due to the fact there's nothing wrong with the claims, ideas, or evidence and content presented.
however if you do decide to, then the burden is upon you to support any claims you make about the video or where exactly and why you believe its wrong.
saying there is no content in an almost 90 minute video, or asking what is worth watching, only suggests you have no interest to engage in any objective or intelligent discourse because you're biased to begin with and have an agenda.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by truthseekr1111
Please, I'm not trying to ridicule I spotted and pointed out a couple of errors. The video even has a graphic, which like the one you posted, indicates that the quake was downgraded.
So the claim of it being a megaquake is a flat out lie.
Originally posted by daskakik
It even says it was the largest of 2012 which is another lie because the largest was in Indonesia. It doesn't help that the person can't get the facts straight.
Originally posted by daskakik
Here is a the place were I found the Oaxaca quake report earthquake-report.com....
Originally posted by daskakik
The image you posted and the video's flat map which shows the spot where the quake occurred don't match up and it looks like the quake had happened closer to Puerto Vallarta which is about 1500km from Oaxaca.
Originally posted by daskakik
img.abovetopsecret.com...
So after lying and showing that he is sloppy in his drawings how can someone not question the videos validity.