It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lucifer was Jesus - Not Satan

page: 3
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 12:08 PM
link   
I don't mean to be rude but this thread is an insult to both Christians and Muslims (Islam regards Jesus as a prophet and forbids any disrespect/slander against him).

It's interesting to connect the dots. However, there's a clear difference between a good and evil figure.




posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by wisdomnotemotion
 




It's interesting to connect the dots. However, there's a clear difference between a good and evil figure.


And there is a clear similarity. They both are known to only appear in humans as we know it.

They are both part of one.



posted on Dec, 27 2013 @ 11:41 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Dec, 30 2013 @ 03:55 AM
link   

WalterRatlos

Originally posted by toocoolnc
reply to post by icepack
 


Yes. Here is how it is implemented:


No, it does not! I am Greek and I should know. phosphorus is composite word combining the noun φως = light and the verb φέρρω = to bring or to bear. Also, it is used only for the chemical element. The term for Lucifer is Εοσφόρος from έος = first light or dawning and φέρρω = to bring.

While it is true that Greeks would identify certain Gods with their own, it has no bearing on your argument, since you start from a faulty premise. Also, the bolding of the suffix -us in your OP for the names of Horus, Jesus and Venus. does not prove as you might think any similarity between them. It's just a suffix and a Latin one at that; the equivalent in Greek would be -os. The only anomaly in there is Venus, because usually the suffix -us in Latin signifies the male while Venus was certainly female.


I'm Greek and his premise is not faulty. He's simply saying that someone has changed the meaning of the name, which is obvious. Just like the same has been done in the old testament, where the names are also changed from the original meanings also. Not only from the original Hebrew, but also from the original meanings as well.

The Bible has been manipulated and changed many times, and is actually changed with just about each new edition. There is nothing at all faulty about his premise. Of course they are going to take root names and words, particularly of the current day language, which is English form.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Red Cloak

Yet the Old Testament foreshadows the New Testament. If this is the case how do you explain Numbers 21:9 where Moses puts a brazen serpent on the pole for all who look upon it to be healed. And FYI in the Greek New Testament there was no cross, the word Stauros and stauroo meant an upright pole or stake that jests was impaled upon. So that that may be healed.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 03:13 AM
link   
This is the theory of all satanists since centuries. It´s false.



posted on Feb, 10 2017 @ 06:48 PM
link   
Light is a reflected output and alter ego of its unseen input.

Every mirror shows the past.



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join