It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Or... there isn't a video, and you're rejecting all the evidence for no good reason. You're ASSUMING that there's a video, and that it is subsequently evidence of a coverup. Your ASSUMPTION is what makes you inadvertently a liar.
Originally posted by IpsissimusMagus
reply to post by Varemia
Or... there isn't a video, and you're rejecting all the evidence for no good reason. You're ASSUMING that there's a video, and that it is subsequently evidence of a coverup. Your ASSUMPTION is what makes you inadvertently a liar.
OMG, you have just gone way beyond idiotic and have achieved complete and utter lunacy.
Are seriously saying that there are no other videos that FBI has. That all the testimony about video tapes being confiscated is false?
I don't wish to break the T&C's but you sir calling me a liar based on such a ridiculous claim as "there isn't a video" is absolutely ludicrous and you deserve to be reamed for the complete fool you are.edit on 6/7/2012 by IpsissimusMagus because: (no reason given)
Are seriously saying that there are no other videos that FBI has. That all the testimony about video tapes being confiscated is false?
Originally posted by benoni
I like this photo the best when it comes to the PENTACON.
Remember the big fireballs at the wtc?
Remember the fireball we saw on the two frames allegedly showing a "plane" hitting the Pentacon??
Does this photo correspond with those supposed fireballs?Note the PC on the desk and the book on top of the chair...this is where "they' would have you believe the "plane" cut through the building.
Note the total lack of fire internally.
I don't give a monkey's how many staged photos you show me of wreckage so small as for it all to fit on my lounge floor...its all lies.
If wtc1 and 2 collapsed because of fire, wheres the fire on this photo?Why didn't it also collapse ?
After all, if that claptrap is good enough for wtc's 1 and 2, why does the same bullish#t not hold up to scrutiny here?
Bring whatever excuses to the table as you wish.
No plane hit the pentagon.
If you were planning the whole 911 thing what would you have used?
Security cameras for one, are not fast enough on their shutter rate to even capture a plane moving that fast. It's photography 101.
Originally posted by samkent
But if you were planning 911 would you use two planes in NYC and bombs and missiles in DC?
I think they are saying that the other tapes do not contain images of the plane. Not that they didn't confiscate a bunch of tapes.
The released video doesn’t show a plane either, so why not release the other videos too?
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by samkent
I think they are saying that the other tapes do not contain images of the plane. Not that they didn't confiscate a bunch of tapes.
If they have other videos and are not releasing them it appears like a cover up of something.
The released video doesn’t show a plane either, so why not release the other videos too?
Originally posted by maxella1
Are you saying this plane is flying at over 500 mph ?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by maxella1
Are you saying this plane is flying at over 500 mph ?
Are you saying that this really matters? The no-planers are insisting there's some weird violation of physics for large planes to be flying at any sustainable speed at low altitudes, and this is a sustainable speed as well as a low altitude by anyone's definition.
If you want to bicker over the speed the plane was flying at, fine, as it's one of those details that really doesn't assist in creating any real division either way, but it's patently obvious that planes can in fact fly at low altitudes and it's patently obvious this "planes can't fly at low altitudes" bit those damned fool conspiracy web sites are passing around is entirely a case of barking up the wrong tree.
Originally posted by SimontheMagus
When's the last time you saw a few guys cart off a 757 by hand in a few minutes time? Why are you so baffled that anybody would like to see some evidence of a 757 in the side of the Pentagon?
Why are we wrong for wanting to see at least a dent from the wings and tail section, when those very same parts were able to penetrate 18 inch thick steel beams on the side of the twin towers like a knife through butter? Are we supposed to believe that cement is that much stronger than steel? Then why could they not build skyscrapers above 20 floors until they learned how to use steel? Who mixed that magic concrete? You can't have it both ways, silly OS'er.
As a side note, I googled "sinister secret agents" for this site and came up with 57,900 hits. "Damned fool conspiracy websites" turned up a mere 4580 results. I would venture to guess the vast majority of them are yours. Don't you think its time to reprogram your auto-keystroke thingy? If you are actually typing this claptrap over and over again, wouldn't it be time to seriously have your OCD condition checked? I have a friend with similar issues and his doctor recommended some rather generous doses of Anafranil. It might really help you.
Originally posted by maxella1
So the speed is irrelevant? Are you serious ?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by maxella1
So the speed is irrelevant? Are you serious ?
Speed would be relevent as far as explaining the specific characteristics of damage we're seeing, certainly, but as to whether or not a plane actually hit, yes, it is irrelevent. We have all this other evidence from eyewitness accounts to plane wreckage to the black box recovered, so it is not for debate that it was flight 77 that hit the Pentagon.
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by samkent
If you were planning the whole 911 thing what would you have used?
They should have asked Bin Laden this question before killing him and dumping his body in the ocean.
A series of five images made by a surveillance camera on Sept. 11 which show American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon were released today. Officials could not explain why the date and time in the bottom left corner of the images are incorrect