Like "Radio Free America" - they publish the PROHIBITED truth into an oppressed nation. That's both legitimate AND propaganda.
The sort of propaganda that's worth watching while remaining cautious of the implications. Ready for a life threatening revolution? How long till
doing nothing becomes life threatening? RT might give us a clue. OR NOT. But like more information is better - so is more discernment.
i can tell you that , RT in regards to matters outside of Russia seem to be str8 forward, however when it comes to matters inside russia they seem to
be just like any other news agency out their , i know this to be true , because i am currently studying the conflict in Chechnya and dagastan , and
using alternate news sources you start to see the real picture , when 5 news outlets in russia tell the same story and the other 1 puts a twist on
it , you start to see FOX NEWS !!!
Nothing comes from RT but Pro-Russian Anti-Western crap. If you think otherwise you need to sort your life out.
For example, during last summers England riots they reported that Lions had been released from London zoo and were prowling the streets of
London...complete made up BS to try and make the situation look worse than it was.
Typical of the nonsense that RT spouts.
I figure if you want the truth about "the west" then watch RT. IF you want the truth about Russia then watch some Western news station
They're both not too bad when talking about the other side, but they have no real ability to self-criticise. For that reason RT, even though its good
on some issues, will always be a propaganda outlet like all other news stations
Everyone is slanting something. I don't think RT is particularly any worse than some western news stations, just different in agenda
I think it would make a great story. Maybe you can tell them about it.
Imagine that, disclosing that the BBC would pull a blatant hoax on national television. That would be great.
I am very surprised at how much some of the repliers in this thread downplay (in their wording) the level or degree of propaganda that CNN and other
US stations partake in. I mean, it is not like a little, or "some"... it is just waaaay over the top propaganda. It is outrageous, obscene,
propaganda; deception of the highest degree.
Its not like they are just trying to sway your opinion. They create highly elaborate and orchestrated deceptions.
My favorite being this one during 9-11 when they interview some "random" spectator on Fox News, who just happens to know exactly why the buildings
fell, only minutes after the occurrence.
edit on 6-6-2012 by nOraKat because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
OP claimed that they don't touch Syria, but RT has been a very strong voice in proposing that the events in Libya and now now Syria are staged by the
West to create instability.
RT have been doing a great job with Syria and Libya, trying to make people aware that NATO agents have been sent in to create humanitarian problems as
a pretext for intervention
RT is good for news relating to American issues and news relating to the globalist elites. They ask the most difficult questions and even report on
what most people call "conspiracies." RT always covers the Bilderberg meetings pretty thoroughly(1). However, for news regarding Russia they're
clearly biased (pro-Russian).
I watch RT for world news because they aren't biased, they report both sides of the story pretty well, they report on both sides in Syria and the
occupy, and even call out other MSM channels who are just blatantly wrong, I watch many programs on the channel and there pretty good. But yeah of
course they'd be biased towards Russia it's the channels origin, it would make no sense to slam their own country when other channels do enough of
it, I like hearing about the real Russian politics though, biased but at least we can have a little bit of insight rather to the BBC comparison of a
corrupt government who kill anyone who gets in their way.
Watch RT for world news
Watch the rest for properganderised news to keep us happy.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.