It is somewhat encouraging to find someone who is keeping up with Lake Vostok, Antarctica.
While I only want to add something of importance to this threads subject matter, it is important to bring certain facts into perspective when
researching Lake Vostok.
While all of the drilling, break through, secrecy, anomalies and drama with the Russians over Lake Vostok, no one other than myself has repeatedly
asked the same question of ATS members and others about why certain questions have not been asked of key people.
While the magnetic anomaly below Lake Vostok is massive in size, it is reported as being the size of Los Angeles and to add to this anomaly, is that
the water temperature above the object ranges from 55* to 65* temperature as determined by NASA scientist.
NASA has done thermal imaging and has much more information and data on the large magnetic anomaly and Lake Vostok than most understand.
What most do not understand is that everything I just mentioned was reported on during a live interview with Art Bell of C2C on April 21, 2001.
That's right, I said April 21, 2001 and just so you dont think ill of me, I have provided the link to the very video that I refer to at the end of
Art Bell was interviewing Richard C. Hoagland on April 21, 2001 about Lake Vostok and the magnetic anomaly that was discovered. All of the remarks and
tid bits of information I refer to came from that interview with Richard C. Hoagland back on April 21, 2001.
I once again mention this fact as part of a Lake Vostok discussion, because I find it hard to believe that no one other than myself can realize the
significance of this fact and what it implies in 2012 when we are still wondering what is down below Lake Vostok.
No one has gleamed the importance of this find, because as I have posted before, why has no one confronted Richard C. Hoagland about all the recent
Lake Vostok discoveries and asked him, why he has been silent on this matter?.
Why has Richard C. Hoagland not commented in any interview about such a fact that he has been aware of such a massive object under Lake Vostok since
April 2001 and most importantly, when all the recent Russian drama was ongoing during their drilling, why did not Richard C. Hoagland get interviewed
about such matters?
The silence on this matter from the Hoagland camp has been deafening and tells me that if such anomaly concerns and research was conducted by NASA in
2001 of which Richard C. Hoagland was a part of, then why did Hoagland remain silent during all the Russian drilling in 2011?
I feel that the magnetic anomaly and or unknown submerged object the size of Los Angeles is a matter that NASA does not want anyone to remember and
which Russia is also pleased that no attention of that nature was brought regarding the Russian true purpose of drilling in the first place.
We should demand more answers from what we already know and if we determine who has already reported what, then we should not ignore the fact that
most if not all of the Lake Vostok concerns stem from the lack of discussion about the magnetic anomaly and the speculation that it could be a space
craft that has some energy source that continues to heat the waters in Lake Vostok.
I hope this offers some new background on Lake Vostok, but in my honest opinion, not until Richard C. Hoagland is made to answer some questions on
this matter will others begin to know or understand why I think as I do on this matter.
Lake Vostok will come up again in the future, but until then we should not act as if what happened at Lake Vostok last year is something new, because
it is not.
April 21, 2001 is before 911 and any interview conducted by Art Bell on such a date with Richard C. Hoagland begs the question of why no one, not even
Richard C. Hoagland has offered any explanation about this most ignored fact of history.
Why no one has interviewed Richard C. Hoagland since regarding Lake Vostok is what concerns my sensibilities about why no discussion about the
greatest find in history by someone like Richard C. Hoagland who truly likes to talk and give interviews has not commented.
Link to short You Tube video with Richard C. Hoagland being interviewed by Art Bell on April 21, 2001.
I hope this adds to the discussion, but if you are truly keeping up with Lake Vostok, then this tid bit of history is key to anything we might want to
ask in 2012 about such an anomaly under Lake Vostok and what if anything NASA and Richard C. Hoagland know about an such a large object the size of
Los Angles buried under Lake Vostok.
Thanks for the thread.