It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Influential African-American pastors have requested Attorney General Eric Holder to grant them a meeting with President Barack Obama, saying he broke their hearts by endorsing gay marriage – "something that is simply wrong" – as a civil right. "We pray for the President ... President Obama is the fulfillment of our dreams for our sons -- and he has broken our hearts by using his power and position to endorse as a civil right something that is simply wrong," the Rev. William Owens, founder and president of the Coalition of African American Pastors (CAAP), wrote in a letter to Holder late Thursday.
The coalition, which comprises of leaders of the black church and civil rights leaders who marched with the Rev. Martin Luther King, decided to seek a meeting with Obama after Holder announced he would speak with 350 black pastors to inform them of their rights in speaking for the president without violating their 501(c)3 status. Organizations with 501(c)3 status are not allowed to be involved in fundraising, political campaigning or lobbying.
Originally posted by Ookie
reply to post by FlyersFan
Because it simply is not an equal rights thing. It is a call for special rights and to change the definition of what being married is. It is wrong and people with morals are always against it. Some things are wrong and all of the fussing in the world won't make it right.
You can't take something that is inherently immoral and expect the church to go along with it. Period.
Originally posted by Ookie
Because it simply is not an equal rights thing. It is a call for special rights and to change the definition of what being married is..
Originally posted by FlyersFan
So why was it okay with the civil rights movement in the 60's but not alright with equal rights for gay Americans now?
“Same-sex marriage is an attempt to do the opposite of what Rev. King did,” Owens said. “It’s an attempt by men to use political power to declare that an act contrary to God’s law and to the natural law is a civil right.”
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Side note ... they said "President Obama is the fulfillment of our dreams for our sons" ... what about their daughters? Was that a bit sexist on their part? Or does saying 'sons' somehow magically include daughters as well??
Originally posted by LadyJae
Originally posted by FlyersFan
So why was it okay with the civil rights movement in the 60's but not alright with equal rights for gay Americans now?
I have no way of knowing how old you are, FlyersFan. Anyone who lived during the times of segregation should know the answer to your question.
J
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by LadyJae
Originally posted by FlyersFan
So why was it okay with the civil rights movement in the 60's but not alright with equal rights for gay Americans now?
I have no way of knowing how old you are, FlyersFan. Anyone who lived during the times of segregation should know the answer to your question.
J
Care to elaborate? How is denying rights for one group similar to gaining rights for another group?
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Care to elaborate? How is denying rights for one group similar to gaining rights for another group?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Side note ... they said "President Obama is the fulfillment of our dreams for our sons" ... what about their daughters? Was that a bit sexist on their part? Or does saying 'sons' somehow magically include daughters as well??