It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BeforeTheHangmansNoose
Originally posted by biggmoneyme
Originally posted by BeforeTheHangmansNoose
reply to post by Domo1
Evolution has countless flaws, believing in it with every ounce of your consciousness is just as ignorant as believing in creationism with the same mentality.
Ron Paul is one of the rare intellects that leaves everything on the fence.
ah i think evolution is fact, technology builds on itself. you had to have a wired phone before a cordless phone. but that real question is evolution really random? i have my doubts over that
Evolution and change is a fundamental basis of our time controlled reality. However i am referring to how humans got to where we are today. There is a missing link we are yet to discover.
Originally posted by soaringhawk
Evolution is a lie. The proof for a God is all around us in the creation and in our own makeup.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
So what Paul doesn't believe in proven facts? So what if Paul wants to ignore reality? So what if Paul say's that he is smarter than everyone who has studied the subject?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by soaringhawk
Evolution is a lie. The proof for a God is all around us in the creation and in our own makeup.
So why can't both be true? Why can't God have used evolution as part of His creation process?
He easily could have used His other creations on other worlds (ET) to seed the Earth and/or
to get an evolution process started.
Why do people think it has to be one or the other?
Why do 'people of faith' tend to constrict how God operates?
God can do whatever He wants and He can create however He wants.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by Domo1
Evolution is a theory. It hasn't be 100% scientifically proven. It has, for the most part, be proven to a degree that makes it an acceptable hypothesis that has various scientific means to prove parts of it.
I happen to believe in it, and consider it proven, but it is only a theory. Until we develop time travel, it will remain a theory, even if we prove that evolution is real and can point to something current as evidence, doesn't mean that's how everything started here, it's only 1 solution out of many.
I tend to stick to the solutions that don't involve the hidden hand of some deity.
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
reply to post by Domo1
Well, it is called "The THEORY of Evolution." Gravity can be and has been proven, so it isn't a theory. There are holes all throughout evolution. If you think that your great, great, great (x 20) grandfather was an amphibian that crawled out of the ocean then you are in need of a vacation.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by braydenf
what is your point to this thread?
I wanted to see if any Paul supporters would be willing to openly state they disagree with Paul on ANYTHING. A few have, and I admire them for their honesty. You can still like Paul and disagree with one thing. I really like a number of Paul's opinions. That doesn't mean I would vote for him. You can want to vote for him, and still disagree. Or can you?
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by hoochymama
Can the Mods help out on this one cuz this could get ugly.
Oh it probably will. Further proving the point that it is impossible to ever fault Paul on a single thing, and that this cult of personality is out of control. He said it, there is nothing misleading about the title of the thread.
Originally posted by paganini
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by paganini
So lets say Ron Paul believes in unicorns. Also that he is an intergalactic space alien? He can't get anything done and is incredibly ineffectual, which to me says that he would be very bad at running a country.
He believes in a lot of outlandish and supernatural things being a christian. So do many other politicians and they manage to be effective in running a country.
Originally posted by yellowhammer
I don't believe in Darwinism. Evolution within a species can occur but Darwinism is about species change. Evolution is not Darwinism. Darwinists have hijacked the word "evolution".
Originally posted by nimsu1987
I don't know what OP is getting at. I know hardly anything about RP apart from many people here seem to like him. I studied Chemistry and Biology at a fairly high level (high school I guess you guys would call it). You will find that not a whole many things in science are absolute fact.
In fact I think OP is shooting himself in the foot as indeed, most things in science are only theory. There are many examples where scientists have had to revise or rethink their ideas. I don't think RP's statement is that bad. If he said it is complete BS and shouldn't be considered as a theory EVER, I would be more inclined to agree with you.