reply to post by maxella1
Here's my own personal little 9/11 investigation that I did on my own time and offer up for FREE!
Above, in my little animated avatar gif challenge I show conclusively that no plane hit the North Tower, now, does anyone want to start laying bets as
to whether or not any plane hit the South Tower? Didn't think so.
Btw I'd like to mention here that this is MY OWN ORIGINAL 9/11 RESEARCH done solely and entirely by Yours Truly, ergo, I came up with this all on my
So NO, I didn't get this info or 'evidence' from anyone, I didn't get it off any "Truther" site or from any individual(s) such as Jones, Gage,
Fetzer, Shack, Hall, or Jayhan et al.
I didn't get this evidence and notion off of any so-called 'damn fool conspiracy site'.
NIST and Popular Mechanics had no input and were neither consulted nor referenced.
I consider what I present in my screen cap animated gif as OBVIOUS FACT and in no way merely my own personal opinion.
Six months ago I was involved in a thread that was trying to determine what the flashes were as the 'planes' entered the buildings, this
necessitated looking at the various video clips etc.
While doing so and looking at the available Naudet clips I noticed two distinct anomalies. The most significant of which is described here in that
tiny animated gif that I made (above left) from a screen capture of the Naudet clip.
You see that isolated "bump" on the very right of the pic? The one that is where the right wing tip would be on a passenger jet?
Yeah well, see, the tip of a jet's wing is not an ISOLATED phenomenon.
It is attached to an ENTIRE WING structure, it (the wing tip) being at the furthermost end etc.
At no time therefore, while crashing head on into something flat would a 'wing tip' make an ISOLATED damage "bump".
The wing it is attached to, which also includes, in this case, the right engine, which it so happens is further forward on the plane than the wing tip
and would therefore first make a gash in the facade from the center point outward progressively until its forward motion included and thoroughly
encompassed even the wing tip, which, considering the "tapered" nature of airplane wings, would be the last bit of damage witnessed to have been
In a progressive tearing puncturing sweeping motion from LEFT TO RIGHT.
Indeed, where the wings are concerned, the right wing tip, because of it being angled further back, would be the VERY LAST bit of damage seen,
occurring LATEST and also being the most extreme right in terms of position.
None of which is, of course, apparent in the video clip or even in the single screen capture. As anyone can plainly see.
The configuration of the 'damage pattern' is clearly "wrong."
Which leads naturally to the conclusion that the right wing shaped gash in the North Tower visible first on the Naudet clip and later on the likes of
CNN and other network station coverages, couldn't possibly have been made by an actual wing of a plane OR by the actual wing on a Boeing passenger