I agree with the above poster...Robert's Rules apply.
In the video it is clear that the overwhelming majority in attendance elected a chair, and the
minority opted to call the police to FORCE their minority opinion..
Then the majority elected another chair, and the minority called the cops again.
Then the majority, turned their backs (and chairs) on the minority, which was absolutely the right thing
to do in this case so that the police could readily see their error in judgement.
And as it turned out, the third chair was not removed and the majority opinion held and Ron Paul
won the majority of the Louisiana delegates.
The GOP establishment would have easily prevailed if they had seated enough warm bodies in the
All the Mitt Romney camp needs to do (to win) is motivate all his many supporters to show up
and be counted. He has overwhelming support at the polls.....BUT WHERE ARE THEY?
The Ron Paul people at these events seem to be battling more with the established GOP power-brokers
who are loathe to lose their "seats of honor" to the neo-GOP Ron Paul supporters, than they are doing
actual battle with Romney supporters....I still say Romney supporters are a myth.....there are simply no
apparent Mitt Romney supporters ANYWHERE.
And I'm not even talking about a reasonable attendance based on the polls and primaries which
should showcase Romney supporters in attendance at these events as the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY.
I'm talking about finding just one or two real-live-flesh-and-blood people.....just ONE sign in ONE yard.....
just one pundit in my face at some point, somewhere, in my day who likes or cares about Mitt Romney
enough to pull my ear for a few seconds
I've met one Mitt Romney supporter. It was here, at ATS. And when I told him how proud I was to
have finally met him because he was the first, true flesh and blood Romney supporter I had ever met,
he reneged and said he actually supported someone else...
So....calling all Romney supporters.....someone....anyone...are you out there???......do you exist???
edit on 4-6-2012 by rival because: (no reason given)