It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitruvian
There are several other questions you might want to ask yourselves.
Why is there no (apparant) input on the part of NASA in the planning of a second version of Chandrayaan named Chandrayaan 2.
Is NASA unwilling to share with the Indians (and the Russians) the wealth of technological/logistical information gained from their enormously successful Apollo flights to the moon ?
Why is there Russian collaboration with the Indians but no American involvement?
Why is it merely a "hardware" hi tech mission..........after all wouldn't NASA have been cooperative with a friendly government in the sharing of vital information towards a successful mission? In other words - ALL the necessary information is already there for a MANNED flight - right? So why not?
Why was Chandrayaan I incapable of mapping HR images of the Apollo landing site that would have conclusively put the matter to rest?
Will the new mapping planned by Chandrayaan II be capable of such HR imaging - if so will they take the pictures - or has NASA claimed the site off limits from above and well as on the moonground?
Nozette worked as a technical consultant for Israel Aerospace Industries between 1998 and 2008. After he left the government job, Nozette was heavily involved in India's extraterrestrial Moon probe, Chandrayaan-1. He was a principal investigator of the Mini-RF instrument on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and a co-investigator on Chandrayaan-1. Source en.wikipedia.org...
And with Chandrayaan we also have to look at Stewart Nozette.
Green Screen is a figure of speech here
originally posted by decisively
He would have been shot with nothing but GREEN behind him and then when layered, the only thing one would see from that filming would be Scott, the green having been subtracted out.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by decisively
reply to post by Vitruvian
Green Screen is a figure of speech here
I have mentioned previously that when I say/write "green screen", this is a figure of speech.
Originally posted by decisively
reply to post by Vitruvian
Green Screen is a figure of speech here
I have mentioned previously that when I say/write "green screen", this is a figure of speech".
The stuff is obviously fake, and it is important for us to deconstruct it.
Proof he dosen't believe his own mantra regarding his premise
Originally posted by choos
reply to post by decisively
is it because a hoax believer doesnt believe they used a green screen where you said they used one? using ambiguity to save yourself
Originally posted by Vitruvian
FROM HERE - second vid in the post -------> www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by decisively
The Apollo 15 In Flight Press Conference
1) Only Scott Bobs around like he is in outer space. Obviously they are trying to "fool" us into thinking that this is a genuine space mission by having Scott float up and down as you see him doing there. Worden and Irwin are sort of painted on there, glued if you will, to the CM backdrop. Bit of an exaggeration, but not much. This is an example of a "weightless scene" which we may have "figured out". Keep in mind, all weightless scenes were NOT done the same way. This one more likely than not employed a layering technique, like green screening or something similar. Scott is the overlay. He would have been shot with nothing but GREEN behind him and then when layered, the only thing one would see from that filming would be Scott, the green having been subtracted out.
The Gif is in the Extenal link below............
RE: Apollo 15 In Flight Press conference part Two www.youtube.com...
I copied the vid into V Downloader and I also opened it for viewing in Virtual Dub so as to
examine it very closely. At frame 2:41 or so Worden goes for his nose. In doing so so as his hand comes down he momentarily rests it on an upright object in front of all of them. As he’s doing that it appears as though his hand brushes against the pocket of Scott’s left arm. Here is a Gif of that incident.
Code for forums for the Gif - GIFSoup
Direct link for the Gif gifsoup.com...
In Virtual Dub I slid the cursor bar rapidly back and forth and the fakery of Scott’s “floating” antics become quite apparent. Its possible that he’s merely ‘jumping’ up and down from a seated position OR there is a device under the seat that accomplishes the up and down motion.
The fact that Worden’s hand goes between the vertical object and Scott’s arm leads me to believe that there is not a green screen involved. BUT it’s still a faked scene in spite of that fact. They are deliberately creating an illusion of him floating.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
And with Chandrayaan we also have to look at Stewart Nozette.
Spell it out for us, please. Random factoids do not a conspiracy make.
Chandrayaan had US Navy gear on it. Stewart Nozette was the NASA guy who went to India to oversee the gear. Stewart Nozette was also caught on video trying to make a deal with FBI agents posing as Israeli intelligence agents.
We can use your help brother Vitruvian. There is much at stake here, so very very much.
I noticed in the 1991 video that Jim doesn't walk with any kind of limp. For a man his age,
with a history of his injuries, I might expect him to walk with some kind of impediment.But he walks with ease and his gait is completely normal to my untrained eyes.
One of the best parts of Irwin's 1991 video is when he is handed the green sheet of paper with the superior articulate questions. When Jim get's tired of answering such well written queries he majestically goes to the children, to answer the simple questions of the children and to comfort them in their childish ignorance.
I believe that Jim Irwin was brainwashed by the C I A.
Sure, i will make this one count.So here goes, your right hand
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by denver22
denver22 I wish you could begin to compete properly in this thread. But what you continue to do is fight this losing battle. You are an experienced contributor to ATS. Please be an example for our newer members and make every post matter.
Green Screen is a figure of speech here
I have mentioned previously that when I say/write "green screen", this is a figure of speech
David Scott is green screened in
Originally posted by Vitruvian
All I was trying to accomplish in my analysis of the video was to say that a "green screen" probably wasn't used without refuting the notion of fakery in NASA’s portrayal of the astronauts during the interview, AND my examination might also preclude the notion of “layering” of any kind having been employed.
As I examined the video more closely I could see that Scott's movements in relation to the others in the scene appeared to be separated from his companions – as though he were on another plane, so to speak. He isn't interacting with them in a natural manner, and the separation looks and feels "physical" and not merely due to the fact that he's emotionally detached from his comrades. Scott’s “floating” movements surely appear faked, which then gives the appearance of the entire scene having been FAKED, regardless of the facts of no "green screen" or layering having been used.
I have caught your glorious leader out!
This is what i do as well as contribute when i need to.
That is my job, and i am good at it.I did my job, and have shown everyone his lies .
I would say, that is contributing to the thread sayonara.