Originally posted by dplum517
Patents to release aerosols that are over a decade old should be included in the theories of what's really going on.
Patents to release aerosols from aircraft date back to the 1920's and 30's:
1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
1631753 – June 7, 1927 – Electric Heater – Referenced in 3990987
1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method
1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment
Are you guys going to sit here and say that not one single field test has been done to see real time and real life results?
I am going to sit here and say that I have not seen any credible evidence of any testing of any "chemtrail" systems.
Edit: Nor any "field tests" of any geo-engineering systems that involve release of anything into the atmosphere by aircraft - the only such test that
I know of was the British one using balloons slated for this year, that has been cancelled - www.abovetopsecret.com...
Are you going to sit there and say there has been such testing? And if so are you going to provide any evidence to support that claim?
To me .... all this article points out is the fact that "chemtrail" deniers who were so adamant a year or two ago that nothing like this could
or will exist .... seem to be changing their minds.
That is rubbish - there has never been any claim that I am awaer of that geoengineering could never exist - the research into it is public and well
Similarly there has never been any doubt that it is trivially easy to "spray stuff" from aircraft.
What is actually sad is that there is no credible evidence that it is actually happening.
and you have still provided none.
moreover you have been part of many discussion where that has been noted, and yet you mis-represent what has actually been said by debunkers and
skeptics, and persistently refuse to provide any credible evidence to support your claims.
All you ever do is use the same discredited "you can't prove it isn't true
" fallacy as
if that proves that it IS true.
edit on 4-6-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)