It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 1BornPatriot
reply to post by PulseZer0
what just winning isn't good enough. I dont want my grandchildren to face a similar plot in 50 years. I think we will need to polygraph the whole government every couple of years to ensure we are not infiltrated. and yes, if the polygraph is good enough for the FBI its good enough to locate the wolves in sheeps clothing. "Have you served this nation with Honor" "Have you had dealing with foreign nationals" Äre you accepting money from any other source than the peoples tax money" should be a good questions.
Alex Jones’ Iran sources proved to be incorrect about a U.S. attack by October 27, 2011 October 28, 2011 by FauxCapitalist On October 13, 2011, Alex Jones, at the end of his discussion with Dr. Steve Pieczenik, said in response to his “insider” source predictions that the U.S. would attack Iran in the next two weeks: 50:48 – “Spread the word, World War III is about to start.“ Two weeks later, at the end of the day on October 27, no attack on Iran has taken place.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by robhines
Murder and enslave people?
Go read the list of attendees and stop being so ignorant.
There are newspaper columnists, journalists, academics, scholars and CEO's...
Or are you trying to say that a CEO of a music and book store is going to murder and enslave you?
Silly fear mongers
Originally posted by groingrinder
reply to post by freakjive
These people are the devil's own. Satan's finest tools. And they possess the money to make that happen.
Our only hope is to elect people who are not affiliated with the Democrats or Republicans and who LOVE AMERICA MORE THAN THEY LOVE POWER OR MONEY. We have to stop electing lawyers and millionaires.
Originally posted by BULLPIN
reply to post by freakjive
Perhaps Tucker and his "inside source" are telling the truth, but in the end it's all just hearsay twice removed. Ron Paul is not a demonstrable threat to the B Bergs anyway so what would be the point?
Are we supposed to take this as a sign that Ron Paul is somehow, "on our side?" NONE OF THEM ARE. They're all bought.
Originally posted by The Sword
Even after RP loses the nomination, his supporters continue with their campaign of mischief.
This conflicts with an earlier article claiming that Peter Thiel, a billionaire that gave money to a RP front group, is at Bilderberg.
So, which is?
Do they want RP or do they not?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Oh this is too good.
Please...Paul supporters....don't tell me you believe this stuff.
Originally posted by Chrisfishenstein
Then again, if someone said this about Romney or Obama, they would be in Guantanamo Bay listening to Sesame street music for the next 5 years until they talk....
Originally posted by CourageousEyesoftheHeart
If such a thing happened I think the attendee list of The Bilderberg meetings had better beef up their security. Me thinks it would be the final nail in their coffin.
They should just go with the flow, why do they always have to conquer and control? What a bunch of maroons. With all the brain power behind global domination, you'd think they'd be able to come up with a win win.
Unfortunately greed is a hard box to think out of, poor selfish bastards.