It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
executed by shabiha members in a village near Qusair, in the west of the country, they said.
Correspondents say the video shows a group of bodies with hideous injuries.
The UN Human Rights Council has meanwhile begun an emergency session to discuss the violence in Syria.
A man wearing a black shirt bearing an Al-Qaeda flag (L) speaks with a UN observer as monitors meet with rebels and civilians in the village of Azzara in the province of Homs on May 4, 2012. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights says the unrest in Syria has killed more than 11,000 people since an anti-regime uprising broke out in March last year.
Originally posted by HumanCondition
Do not believe the lies people
.
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by HumanCondition
Do not believe the lies people
.
Gaddafi, Assad, Ahmadenijad...why do liberals always champion the wrong side?
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by HumanCondition
Do not believe the lies people
.
Gaddafi, Assad, Ahmadenijad...why do liberals always champion the wrong side?
Gaddafi, Assad, Ahmadenijad...why do liberals always champion the wrong side?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by SLAYER69
If it is the Syrian government then it is ok because we all know certain collateral damage is acceptable because the rebel terrorists are using civilian shields. We do this ourselves with our drone strikes, but the difference is that we are fighting another country while this is an internal conflict in which the rebel terrorists are being funded by NATO forces.
Let me get this straight. You say if it is the Syrian Government then it is justified because the West kills people with drone strikes in some completely different country?