Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
A long but excellent expose on how this administration fabricated the case for war against Iraq.
Fabricated case for the war?..and this administration? only?...so i guess you, along with everyone else who thinks the same way, do not remember what the previous administration was saying about Iraq's wmd programme?
If you want to say that anyone has fabricated any case against Iraq, then you would have to say pretty much the whole world did. Starting with the previous administration.
What was the Clinton administration saying back in 1998? Do not tell me this is only the past, it is part of what is happening now, and why we were dragged, since the Clinton administration, into this war. The current administration was not the first one, neither was the US the only nation, to present the case of Iraq's wmd. To say otherwise is to ignore the past and the declarations most nations were making on Iraq's wmd. If you want to question the credibility of the US, you must question the credibility of the UN and those nations that were adamantly agreeing that Saddam's wmd posed a threat.
WASHINGTON (Feb. 18) -- In preparing the nation for a possible war with Iraq, President Bill Clinton faces a series of obstacles, including a skeptical Congress and less international backing than President George Bush enjoyed during 1991 Persian Gulf War.
So far, Clinton has the public's backing: two-thirds of the nation approves of how he is handling the crisis, according to the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll.
But that can't obscure the fact that the United States appears ready to strike at Saddam Hussein's rogue state without any unanimity of opinion on what the goal of an attack should be.
Should the U.S. merely try to punish Hussein for his latest intransigence over U.N. weapons inspections? Should it try to seriously diminish his ability to develop weapons of mass destruction? Should it actually try to topple his regime?
..........
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear," Clinton said. "We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program. We want to seriously reduce his capacity to threaten his neighbors."
Excerpted from.
www.cnn.com...
humm, i wonder what then is all the other information regarding Saddam's wmd..was all of this made up since the Clinton administration?...
What about the interviews with Iraqi scientists and what the other intelligence agencies around the world were saying about the wmd? how many countries were actually saying they all believed Saddam had wmd before the war? Was all of it made up?
[edit on 2-10-2004 by Muaddib]


(joking...or is it?.. ;P)