POLITICS: How the White House Used Errant Iraqi Intelligence, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 2-10-2004 @ 06:44 PM by SkepticOverlord
The New York Times is reporting an interesting sequence of events that shows how the White House knew its Iraqi intelligence did not point to weapons of mass destruction, yet continued to claim before congress and the public that Saddam Hussein was attempting to build nuclear weapons.

www.nytimes.com In a speech to veterans that August, Vice President Dick Cheney said Mr. Hussein could have an atomic bomb "fairly soon." The next month, Mr. Cheney told a group of Wyoming Republicans the United States had "irrefutable evidence" - thousands of tubes made of high-strength aluminum, tubes that the Bush administration said were destined for clandestine Iraqi uranium centrifuges, before some were seized at the behest of the United States. The tubes quickly became a critical exhibit in the administration's brief against Iraq. As the only physical evidence the United States could brandish of Mr. Hussein's revived nuclear ambitions, they gave credibility to the apocalyptic imagery invoked by President Bush and his advisers. The tubes were "only really suited for nuclear weapons programs," Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, asserted on CNN on Sept. 8, 2002. "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." Before Ms. Rice made those remarks, though, she was aware that the government's foremost nuclear experts had concluded that the tubes were most likely not for nuclear weapons at all, an examination by The New York Times has found. Months before, her staff had been told that these experts, at the Energy Department, believed the tubes were probably intended for small artillery rockets.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
A long but excellent expose on how this administration fabricated the case for war against Iraq.


reply posted on 2-10-2004 @ 08:58 PM by Muaddib
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
A long but excellent expose on how this administration fabricated the case for war against Iraq.


Fabricated case for the war?..and this administration? only?...so i guess you, along with everyone else who thinks the same way, do not remember what the previous administration was saying about Iraq's wmd programme?

If you want to say that anyone has fabricated any case against Iraq, then you would have to say pretty much the whole world did. Starting with the previous administration.

What was the Clinton administration saying back in 1998? Do not tell me this is only the past, it is part of what is happening now, and why we were dragged, since the Clinton administration, into this war. The current administration was not the first one, neither was the US the only nation, to present the case of Iraq's wmd. To say otherwise is to ignore the past and the declarations most nations were making on Iraq's wmd. If you want to question the credibility of the US, you must question the credibility of the UN and those nations that were adamantly agreeing that Saddam's wmd posed a threat.

WASHINGTON (Feb. 18) -- In preparing the nation for a possible war with Iraq, President Bill Clinton faces a series of obstacles, including a skeptical Congress and less international backing than President George Bush enjoyed during 1991 Persian Gulf War.

So far, Clinton has the public's backing: two-thirds of the nation approves of how he is handling the crisis, according to the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll.

But that can't obscure the fact that the United States appears ready to strike at Saddam Hussein's rogue state without any unanimity of opinion on what the goal of an attack should be.

Should the U.S. merely try to punish Hussein for his latest intransigence over U.N. weapons inspections? Should it try to seriously diminish his ability to develop weapons of mass destruction? Should it actually try to topple his regime?
..........
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear," Clinton said. "We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program. We want to seriously reduce his capacity to threaten his neighbors."

Excerpted from.
www.cnn.com...

humm, i wonder what then is all the other information regarding Saddam's wmd..was all of this made up since the Clinton administration?...

What about the interviews with Iraqi scientists and what the other intelligence agencies around the world were saying about the wmd? how many countries were actually saying they all believed Saddam had wmd before the war? Was all of it made up?


[edit on 2-10-2004 by Muaddib]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 6 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 56 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags