Hawaii Verifies Obama a Dual Citizen: Not Qualified For Presidency

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by PurpleChiten

 

Just because it's in wikipedia doesn't make it so. Maybe they wrote the same stuff that's in Fogbow. I wouldn't be surprised.

Fine, here it is from the US State Department, are you going to TRY to refute them as well?
fpc.state.gov...

You must be very young chiten

Originally posted by HamrHeed
You must be very young chiten

I wish ... I'm old enough to run for POTUS , as well as a natural born citizen... now if only I were a billionaire like Romney, I'd be right in there

Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by SJE98

 

Well see, that's even more proof that this birther stuff is complete and utter none sense. This guy that had dual citizenship was CAUGHT because he was investigated. He was caught before he even stepped foot in the white house.

That alone proves that the citizen of the President is VERIFIED before he assumes the position of POTUS.

I'm frankly not all that surprised that you would take the word of Democrat Socialist of America member Nancy Pelosi to be truthful in that regard.

reply to post by HamrHeed


Just a liberal....they keep that childlike sense of thinking about the world.......(not a compliment)

Birthers have to have low IQs

They are presented multiple legal rulings on what a natural born citizen is and they still jump up and down that Obama is ineligible.

So when are you guys taking this up to the Supreme Court? It sounds like you people have an insurmountable amount of evidence that will surely get Obama impeached.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


They just can't get it through their childlike minds that they were fooled and the country was fooled a crime was committed and we are on to it....maybe us Joe and Jane Shmos don't have the money are the power to get the court to do anything...but we know and we will let others know...the secret is out....knowledge is power...


and if they are so sure we can't do anything about it, why do they keep arguing with us? Why all the fuss if they won??

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by PurpleChiten

 

Just because it's in wikipedia doesn't make it so. Maybe they wrote the same stuff that's in Fogbow. I wouldn't be surprised.

Wikipedia has citations. Did you check them?
It is the very first one. Scroll down the page to where it says "Notes" and you can click on the source PDF and see it all by yourself without giving a crap how wikipedia quoted it.
It seems like you went out of your way to just dismiss something that is so easily checked out.

reply to post by RealSpoke


Well mine is higher than your beloved President's...and I can speak sentences without a teleprompter...I know how many states there are and I know my birthdate.....

Originally posted by PurpleChiten

Originally posted by HamrHeed
You must be very young chiten

I wish ... I'm old enough to run for POTUS , as well as a natural born citizen... now if only I were a billionaire like Romney, I'd be right in there

edit on 1-6-2012 by PurpleChiten because: (no reason given)

Thanks for proving my point once again. And you whine that people aren't christian enough for your liking so you smite them?
Childish crap

reply to post by muse7


Supreme courts, any court, nothing matters... John Edwards just got dismissed....What kind of court system does justice do to politicians? Apparently nothing....Therefore they can get away with anything as long as they are connected to the serpent....

100% PROOF Obama is NOT Eligible To Be President with HIS OWN ADMISSION!

Here is the entire report, the whole thing (since I know good and well the birthers won't follow the link and search for the document, I went ahead and did it for you)
This is from the State Department of the United States, published on November 14, 2011, the most recent and the legally binding statment. This is the legal stance, if you want to change it, take it to the Supreme Court, otherwise, there is not one thing you can do about it.

www.fas.org...



The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth,” either by being born “in” the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth.” Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an “alien” required to go through the legal process of “naturalization” to become a U.S. citizen.

Originally posted by PurpleChiten

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by PurpleChiten

 

The whole pint that that Obamabots twist and pervert is "under the jurisdiction of the US" That means owing NO allegiance to any other country meaning they absolutely CANNOT be the child of an illegal alien....the left keeps trying to pull the wool over America's eyes....DON"T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT!

First, Sec 1992 of US Revised Statutes, the same Congress which adopted the 14th Amendment confirmed that “all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power...are declared to be citizens of the United States.”

Opponents of the controversial birthright citizenship practice should also take note, since Judge Malihi's opinion further entrenches the notion that every baby born on U.S. soil, regardless of the citizenship or domicile of its parents (presumably even an "anchor baby" or "birth tourist" baby) is a "natural born" citizen. So would have been Anwar al-Awlaki. Read more: www.americanthinker.com...

Notice these are Liberal Judge's OPINIONS on Obama NOT rulings.

You can twist and turn until the cows come home but he is the sitting PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and is running for RE-ELECTION and will most likely win. Until YOU and your group prove otherwise, which will NOT happen, he is a natural born citizen and the President of the United States regardless of how you personally feel about it or disapprove of it.
Ranting and raving on a message board isn't going to do a thing about it. If you want to challenge it, take it to the Supreme Court, they are the ONLY group of people who can change it or verify it so you are doing nothing but blowing a lot of hot air.

Timetothink is correct. All the cases on obama bc have been THROWN out and not tried based on the so-called "merit" of the case. They are opinions on why the case will not be tried.

Originally posted by timetothink
knowledge is power...

So you are saying you are the equivalent of a 98 pound weakling???

reply to post by timetothink


I argue with birthers out of boredom and to see what kind of new "evidence" they come up with...seems like you guys come up with new evidence every day. lol

ever thought about becoming a detective?

maybe you should lend your skills to sheriff joe's posse

reply to post by Autumnal

You did say dual citizenship disqualifies you, right

nope, not specifically, although, the statement is a true one.

You lost me here

typical, i'd suppose you can't float a boat without a paddle either
let's try more simple english ... same question, revised.
do you or can you recall a time when the seat of POTUS was Not manipulated by those of foreign influence ??
[don't forget about the CFR cause i'm pretty sure it's been around longer than you or i]

You are flat out saying that any country in the world can decide on a whim who is and is not allowed to run for president of the United States.
That is what you are saying.

this would be putting words in my mouth.
would you like me to do that to you or shall we just have a civil discussion?

such decisions are Never made on a whim.
rather, they are designed over many, many years, generations, clubs, grooming activities, associations, commitments, obligations and finance.
[probably a few other skills but not necessary for this post]

now, if you are going to continue trying to TELL me what i'm saying, please TELL someone else.
i have my own words, my own opinions and am willing to discuss them, are you ??

reply to post by KonquestAbySS


President Fillmore was one of the great ones, I did paper one this guy in college. You know I think this birther stuff happened about 5 or 6 times in history, someone was kicked off the ballots in 5 or 6 states at one time because of citizenship. I'm not sure whom that was, can't place the name.

Originally posted by Autumnal

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by PurpleChiten

 

Just because it's in wikipedia doesn't make it so. Maybe they wrote the same stuff that's in Fogbow. I wouldn't be surprised.

Wikipedia has citations. Did you check them?
It is the very first one. Scroll down the page to where it says "Notes" and you can click on the source PDF and see it all by yourself without giving a crap how wikipedia quoted it.
It seems like you went out of your way to just dismiss something that is so easily checked out.

they aren't capable of understanding what a citation is, ...
Here is the entire report, the whole thing (since I know good and well the birthers won't follow the link and search for the document, I went ahead and did it for you)
This is from the State Department of the United States, published on November 14, 2011, the most recent and the legally binding statment. This is the legal stance, if you want to change it, take it to the Supreme Court, otherwise, there is not one thing you can do about it.

www.fas.org...



The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth,” either by being born “in” the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth.” Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an “alien” required to go through the legal process of “naturalization” to become a U.S. citizen.