Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

US Retains Plans for Military Option in Syria

page: 1
0

log in

join

posted on May, 31 2012 @ 11:03 AM
link   

US Retains Plans for Military Option in Syria


news.antiwar.com

Even as U.S. officials criticize direct military action in Syria as unworkable, the Obama administration continues to make clear that the military option is being considered and plans drawn up.
“As you know, my job is to provide the commander-in-chief with options,” said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “I think the military option should be considered.”
Actions under discussion include sending in ground troops with the stated mission of safeguarding Syria’s weapons and providing humanitarian assistance. But the imposition of U.S. soldiers would undoubted
(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Syria: West may be forced to seize WMD, report
Syria prepares for US attack...




posted on May, 31 2012 @ 11:03 AM
link   
haha this is my favorite part:


Actions under discussion include sending in ground troops with the stated mission of safeguarding Syria’s weapons and providing humanitarian assistance.


Well well well.. deja vu? Same pre-amble as Lybia.. Under guise of protection and humanitarian assistance, they want to use the military option.. ugh.

When will this stop?! Its so obvious that this is for resources and strategic control of the ME.. will there be any interntional pushback? Maybe and most likely from Russia and maybe China, but that won;t matter. When NATO gets its gears going there is no stopping it!

Thoughts?!

news.antiwar.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 11:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Nspekta
 


The U.S. Government isn't happy unless they're at war with someone.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 11:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by KnightFire
reply to post by Nspekta
 


The U.S. Government isn't happy unless they're at war with someone.


I might rephrase that to :

the u.s. government doesn't function unless it is at war with someone



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 11:41 AM
link   
The military pretty much has options for every possible contingency.

That doesn't necessarily mean we'll act on those plans.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by spoonbender

Originally posted by KnightFire
reply to post by Nspekta
 


The U.S. Government isn't happy unless they're at war with someone.


I might rephrase that to :

the u.s. government doesn't function unless it is at war with someone


I wouldn't rehrase it, because both statements are true. Your statement is true because; The U.S government must be in a war to gain revenue after they let Walmart force the majority of manufacturing jobs overseas so they (Walmart) could make more profits.






top topics
 
0

log in

join