Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Another reason that points to an inside job !

page: 2
8
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:00 PM
link   
reply to post by jazz10
 


I know that Lithium is valued as a source material for tritium production and as a neutron absorber in nuclear fusion.

Thats as far as my knowledge goes




posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by dawnprince
Gonna keep this short and sweet .

If 9/11 was truly an act of foreign terrorists , why attack the towers at such an early time ? surely if they wanted to be sure of maximum loss of life , they would have attacked when the towers were sure to be more populated .

The fact that only a fraction of the possible deaths occurred smacks of somebody sacrificing the few to fulfil their aims.
It's like breaking into the national treasury , but only stealing all the dimes .
It's been a nagging thought that won't go away .

edit on 30-5-2012 by dawnprince because: (no reason given)


Could it be that the airports are busier during early hours and they though that there would be less chances of getting caught ?

I don't think they cared how many they kill, they just needed to really scare American people. And they succeeded.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:04 PM
link   
reply to post by dawnprince
 


I have here a few links to posts i made to a thread regarding A frozen water bottle.Yeah you read right but i think you will see what i am talking about.
Link 1

Link 2

Link 3



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by maxella1

Originally posted by dawnprince
Gonna keep this short and sweet .

If 9/11 was truly an act of foreign terrorists , why attack the towers at such an early time ? surely if they wanted to be sure of maximum loss of life , they would have attacked when the towers were sure to be more populated .

The fact that only a fraction of the possible deaths occurred smacks of somebody sacrificing the few to fulfil their aims.
It's like breaking into the national treasury , but only stealing all the dimes .
It's been a nagging thought that won't go away .

edit on 30-5-2012 by dawnprince because: (no reason given)




Could it be that the airports are busier during early hours and they though that there would be less chances of getting caught ?

I don't think they cared how many they kill, they just needed to really scare American people. And they succeeded.


No , firstly the Media succeeded in scaring the American people , not the acts themselves .
Secondly . If the terrorists were scared of getting caught they again would have struck at night when their acts would have met little resistance.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:18 PM
link   
reply to post by jazz10
 


I see where you are going and I agree .

Seems there are a lot of smug people in power that have literally got away with theft , fraud and mass murder.
Are they ever going to face justice ?



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by dawnprince
 



If 9/11 was truly an act of foreign terrorists , why attack the towers at such an early time ? surely if they wanted to be sure of maximum loss of life , they would have attacked when the towers were sure to be more populated .


Its because of the airline schedules .....

Planes leaving on transcontinental flights for the west coast takeoff between 7 AM and 9 AM eastern time

The terrorists were aiming for transcontinental flights because the planes were be carrying large fuel load

The heavy fuel load would enhance the effects of the impact.

If the terrorists had waited later in the day would have had fewer flights to choose from

Also as the day goes on is greater risk of delays from weather or mechanical issues which would destroy
the synchonization of the attacks

Saw what happened when Flight 93 left Newark 40 minutes late - passengers were able to learn of attacks
on WTC and Pentagon and take action



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:34 PM
link   
reply to post by P-M-H
 



How about this for a reason. They are rebuilding a tower 'One world trade center'


So we should leave the WTC site an empty hole in the ground ?

Stupidest thing I've heard....



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Wait, 911 hasn't been solved here?

Rumsfeld isn't in prison?! You want to solve 911, look for the Arlington Papers. I don't really know much about it, as I didn't pat much attention to it.. and it happened over a decade ago now. According to the Arlington Papers Rumsfeld was involved in a massive preemptive strike on american targets to force the US into a 1984 style series of conflicts that would further his own purposes. Bush was also implicated, but it couldnt be proved he knew anything about it.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by dawnprince
 


I think that at night there is less flight than in the morning. So the airport employees have more time at night to really check passengers and that means more chances to get caught.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:42 PM
link   
reply to post by thedman
 



You cherry picked his reply .
That was unfair and dishonest .



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by dawnprince
 


I think that at night there is less flight than in the morning. So the airport employees have more time at night to really check passengers and that means more chances to get caught.


Wait . you can't have it both ways .
Either they chose the time they did , not to get caught or they chose the busiest time to blend in and risk having less of impact on the world stage ?

These were supposedly suicidal maniacs remember . They weren't bothered about being caught , only fulfilling their assignment .



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by dawnprince

Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by dawnprince
 


I
These were supposedly suicidal maniacs remember . They weren't bothered about being caught , only fulfilling their assignment .




This makes no sense.If they weren't worried about getting caught how could they fullfill what the set out to do?Don't you think they made damn sure they didn't get caught?By your logic you could also ask why didn't they pick planes with more people on them for more deaths? Fact remains after the first strike,as someone pointed out,there was time for people to evacuate.So of course you're going to have less deaths.I don't entirely buy the official story but some of these theories are way harder to believe.
edit on 30-5-2012 by nightstalker78 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by dawnprince

Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by dawnprince
 


I think that at night there is less flight than in the morning. So the airport employees have more time at night to really check passengers and that means more chances to get caught.


Wait . you can't have it both ways .
Either they chose the time they did , not to get caught or they chose the busiest time to blend in and risk having less of impact on the world stage ?

These were supposedly suicidal maniacs remember . They weren't bothered about being caught , only fulfilling their assignment .


I have no idea how they chose the airports. But doing it during the time when security have their hands full. Makes sense to me.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maxatoria
the towers were the target so it didn't matter what time of the day it happened it just mattered that that the planes hit their target


How do you know this? Were you part of the it?! Lol

Surely if it was bin laden that supposedly did it (it wasn't) then he would have wanted as many people as dead as possible.

I say the timing fitted in well with al lthe other activities going on that day, like the war games sim for example.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maxatoria
reply to post by dawnprince
 


the point of terrorism aint to cause as much death as possible but to get the best vantage point for your views so if people had woken up to the fact the towers had been knocked down then it would of had less impact than being able to have all the OMG sort of stuff


Well why even commit terrorism then if there are other non-deadly ways to get your views across?



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by dawnprince
 


Yep, but thats not everything. Far from it.
Think of economy and not only rebuilding ventures. Think of those at the top of the economy at the moment. Technology.
From technology we need certain minerals.
Lithium for example, remind me what is lithium used for and if you were to control lithium where would that put you financially?
Lithium seams? where? Afghanistan?
That is just the tip of the iceberg.
I made an interesting find a day or 2 ago that may be of no suprise.
I will post the link to the reply i made on another thread. Take it as you wish but, me........I think this one event had more than one motive. Many birds with one stone.


Money was the core motive imo. So many strange finacial transactions went on, trading in AA shares is a good indicator for starters.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:26 PM
link   
Ok , let's see what we have so far .
Supposedly a bunch of foreign terrorists not only managed to carry out their plan despite going up against some of the best intelligence op's on the planet . They then learned how to expertly fly commercial jets , after hijacking the planes armed with knives and sheep shears. They then flew the planes into the twin towers and the pentagon?

I have only one question left ...... What the F*ck did they gain ?
Nobody and I repeat nobody has ever claimed responsibility for those acts .

Mr Bush . Mr Rumsfeld . Care to step forward ?



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by P-M-H
 



How about this for a reason. They are rebuilding a tower 'One world trade center'


So we should leave the WTC site an empty hole in the ground ?

Stupidest thing I've heard....


You have obviously misinterpreted what that post menat and put your own spin on it!



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 07:09 PM
link   
IF the "terrorists" were the ones that flew into the buildings, they wouldn't have cared whether or not the buildings were full or half empty.

How would they have expected the buildings to go into such a perfect freefall straight down?

IF it were "terrorists" they wouldn't have expected anywhere near even half of the destruction that happened.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by snowspirit
IF the "terrorists" were the ones that flew into the buildings, they wouldn't have cared whether or not the buildings were full or half empty.

How would they have expected the buildings to go into such a perfect freefall straight down?

IF it were "terrorists" they wouldn't have expected anywhere near even half of the destruction that happened.


Exactly , my friend .

Please bear in mind they were terrorists . They just weren't foreign









 
8
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join