It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by Domo1
I think it's probably best to take most news with a grain of salt.
You're a freaking moron Domo. What the guy in that video says is completely true and you know it.
Originally posted by TheCelestialHuman
When I saw this thread earlier ( www.abovetopsecret.com... ) I knew there had to be more to it than what was being revealed. Ron Paul is still in this race, and I am sure he will not go down as easy as the GOP would hope at the convention.
Can't wait to see the look on Romney's face when he loses at the convention.
Even better, I can't wait to see the look on Obama's face when he has to go one on one with Ron Paul in a debate.edit on 30-5-2012 by TheCelestialHuman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OrphenFire
As much as I hate to admit, if this were completely reversed, everyone would be in an uproar.
That is, if Ron Paul was winning all of the caucuses in every state like Romney has been, but yet there was this business of delegates voting instead for Romney, Ron Paul supporters would be in a screaming fit.
I am a Ron Paul supporter. I have to admit that if the scenario were reversed, I would have a huge problem with it. But since I support Paul, I am hoping he wins at the Convention. I think he stands a real chance of beating Obama in debates. Romney doesn't. Romney is a tool with lots of money and is a horrible choice for President. If my choices are Romney or Obama, I'm voting for Obama. At that point, a vote for Paul would be wasted.
Think of a scale. One side represents Obama, the other Romney. I can either place a stone on Obama's side, on Romney's side, or throw the stone into the river. Well, I don't want Romney winning, so I'd better add weight to the other side. Throwing my stone into the river isn't going to help... as sad as it is...
RP2012
Originally posted by Glowd33
I would still throw it in the river.
Originally posted by OrphenFire
As much as I hate to admit, if this were completely reversed, everyone would be in an uproar.
That is, if Ron Paul was winning all of the caucuses in every state like Romney has been, but yet there was this business of delegates voting instead for Romney, Ron Paul supporters would be in a screaming fit.
I am a Ron Paul supporter. I have to admit that if the scenario were reversed, I would have a huge problem with it. But since I support Paul, I am hoping he wins at the Convention. I think he stands a real chance of beating Obama in debates. Romney doesn't. Romney is a tool with lots of money and is a horrible choice for President. If my choices are Romney or Obama, I'm voting for Obama. At that point, a vote for Paul would be wasted.
Think of a scale. One side represents Obama, the other Romney. I can either place a stone on Obama's side, on Romney's side, or throw the stone into the river. Well, I don't want Romney winning, so I'd better add weight to the other side. Throwing my stone into the river isn't going to help... as sad as it is...
RP2012
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Wow, you have to see this to believe it. Ron Paul supporters actually think they can defy the will of the majority of the people who voted in the primaries? ...and simply force their candidate on them? The people who would be Dictators
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
It's just sad at this point.
Romney is the nominee...deal with it.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
It's just sad at this point.
Romney is the nominee...deal with it.
Originally posted by SWCCFAN
I have a friend in Louisiana and he is a Paul supporter, he is also going to the LA state convention. He sent me a text message worried about his safety (was asking if I would provide some executive protection along with another friend that worked for Blackwater). The republican establishment doesn't like losing its power to new blood. ie. Ron Paul supporters.
It kinda got me thinking, what if in the states where Ron Paul has the delegates, are prevented from attending the national convention. Instead the establishment that was unseated sends there own delegation. I fear this is a very real possibility. We have seen in several states and well documented here on ATS that the establishment has repeatedly refused to seat Paul supporters even though they were the majority. Some conventions taking place outside the venue as the establishment kicked them out.
Lets fast forward to the Republican National Convention...
The Paul delegates show up with their state issued credentials but the establishment refuses to allow them in. They protest. The MSM will just call them sore losers and not even carry it as a headline. Since the Secret Service will be involved many supporters may be charged as felons due to the Executive Order signed by Obama.
We are in for a show!
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by freakjive
A better title would be:
"Mitt Romney Fails to Secure Republican Nomination in Texas".
Is this what we have to look forward to if Ron Paul is elected? An increase in terrible grammar?