It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Plate tectonics and Planet X are obviously related.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
How many times must you be told? Harrington was looking for Lowell's Planet X. This was a planet that would cause perturbations in the orbits of the gas giants. These perturbations were explained away when Voyager 2 did a fly-by of Neptune in 1989.
Einstein was referring to Hapgood's work.
Hapgood referred to geographic poleshifts.
Many believe geographic poleshifts are caused by regular passes of Planet X.
I don't see any misrepresentation.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
How many times must you be told? Harrington was looking for Lowell's Planet X. This was a planet that would cause perturbations in the orbits of the gas giants. These perturbations were explained away when Voyager 2 did a fly-by of Neptune in 1989.
Please link me to the scientific evidence that the unknown pertubations of Neptune and Uranus were explained by the fly-by in 1989. Also please explain to me why Harrington ordered an infrared telescope for his work in NZ years after the flyby apparently explained the pertubations.
Also, I think you'll need to add to the debunking of ancient civilizations in your signature, at least a dozen ancient cultures have referred to a 2012 target:
"Sooooo... Just a coincidence that these other cultures have a 2012 target?
Hopi Predict a 25yr period of purification followed by End of Fourth World and beginning of the Fifth.
Mayans Call it the 'end days' or the end of time as we know it.
Maoris Say that as the veils dissolve there will be a merging of the physical & spiritual worlds.
Zulu Believe that the whole world will be turned upside down.
Hindus Kali Yuga (end time of man). The Coming of Kalki & critical mass of Enlightened Ones.
Incas Call it the 'Age of Meeting Ourselves Again'.
Aztec Call this the Time of the Sixth Sun. A time of transformation. Creation of new race.
Dogon Say that the spaceship of the visitors, the Nommo, will return in the form of a blue star
Pueblo Acknowledge it'll be the emergence into the Fifth World
Cherokee Their ancient calendar ends exactly at 2012 as does the Mayan calendar.
Tibetan Kalachakra teachings are prophesies left by Buddha predicting Coming of the Golden Age.
Egypt According to the Great Pyramid (stone calendar), present time cycle ends in year 2012 AD"
From church of critical thinking website:
churchofcriticalthinking.org...
edit on 13-6-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: spellingedit on 13-6-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: spelling
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Plate tectonics and Planet X are obviously related.
Completely unrelated. Plates are driven by the internal heat of the Earth and not from outside forces.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Einstein wrote a preface to Hapgood's book. At the time paleomagnetism, plate tectonics, and isostacy were unknown or in an infant state of development. Today Einstein would not give a suggestion to follow that path since the evidence against ECDs is overwhelming.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Plate tectonics and Planet X are obviously related.
Completely unrelated. Plates are driven by the internal heat of the Earth and not from outside forces.
I'm well acquainted with the Convection Theory of Plate Tectonics. It obviously explains a lot. Does it explain everything? No.
Do you understand the difference between a theory and a law?
There is much evidence of previous geographic pole shifts. Did they happen by magic? This link outlines the overwhelming evidence of past geographic pole shifts:
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Einstein wrote a preface to Hapgood's book. At the time paleomagnetism, plate tectonics, and isostacy were unknown or in an infant state of development. Today Einstein would not give a suggestion to follow that path since the evidence against ECDs is overwhelming.
Specifically, Einstein, who knew nothing about planetary geology (why should he, it was no more his subject of interest or study than dentistry was), but did understand due scientific process, said:
"His idea is original, of great simplicity, and – if it continues to prove itself – of great importance to everything that is related to the history of the earth’s surface”
And of course, it didn't. Tectonics provided a much better explanation of what Hapgood described, and other of Hapgoods assertions were shown to be untrue (or based on ideas of the time, which have since shown to be untrue as new data has come to light).edit on 13-6-2012 by AndyMayhew because: (no reason given)
Hapgood collected geomagnetic rock samples, finding evidence that the most recent earth crust displacement must have occurred between 17,000 to 12,000 years ago. The North Pole would have moved from the Hudson Bay area of northern Canada to it's current place in the Arctic Ocean. More recently, Langway and Hansen (1973) gathered climactic data pointing to a dramatic change in climate at 12,000 years ago. At that time, the Pleistocene extinctions, rising ocean levels, the close of the ice age, and the origins of agriculture all seem to coincide."
Originally posted by flyswatter
So, are you arguing pole shifts or an imaginary planet here? Evidence of pole shifts is much more abundant, whereas there is no evidence of your planet. If you're trying to argue one causing the other, the only relation is the theory that your imaginary planet could have caused the pole shift.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by flyswatter
All they did was exchange one assumption of the planetary masses for another assumption of different planetary masses - fairly worthless assumptions until they have better knowledge of the mineral make-up of Uranus and Neptune - and proof of nothing - until they can at least send seismic waves through the cores to have a better understanding of their content and hence masses.
Also, no one has adequately explained the voyager anomalies - which is best explained by the presence of Planet X.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by flyswatter
So, are you arguing pole shifts or an imaginary planet here? Evidence of pole shifts is much more abundant, whereas there is no evidence of your planet. If you're trying to argue one causing the other, the only relation is the theory that your imaginary planet could have caused the pole shift.
Please show me where science has a definitive answer as to why poleshifts occurred.
Oh, you can't because there is none!