It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by hawkiye
It's equally amazing the amount of people will believe any anti government story just because it's an anti government story.
Confirmation bias runs rampant!
Anyone who makes a statement like that is a naive blind fool. Government has a long history of oppressive over bearing incompetent and unlawful action. Idiots that claim any suspicion of government is just an over reaction live in la la land happily drinking their fluoride and dutifully taking their government mandated poisons/vaccines and never had to deal with the bureau-rats oppressing them...
Originally posted by roguetechie
It's pretty obvious that the facts do not support the beekeeper in question as anything other than a dangerous rogue who was endangering other bee populations. It's kind of shocking how many people read this thread all the way through and came up with another impression.
Originally posted by Druid42
reply to post by ABNARTY
Imports of honey from other countries, namely China, who can produce honey cheaper and thus make it unprofitable for domestic beekeepers to produce honey. That's not the cause, that's the reason for. Let me explain......
Commercial beekeepers are different from the likes of me. I have a small apiary to tend to. They have hundreds of hives. They used to make a profit from their honey production, pre-2001, before the advent of CCD. Free trade agreements let the Chinese import honey into the US marketplace, undercutting domestic producers, so they had to turn to other aspects of income generation.
What did the domestic beekeepers start doing? They got into the VERY lucrative field of crop pollination. The commercial beekeeper in the US no longer was making a profit from their honey production, so they started boxing up hives and trucking them to different fields in different locations across the US, and the farmers paid them handsomely for doing that during pollen flow.
Commercial beekeepers typical have their hives in California during Almond crop pollination, box them back up and truck them to Florida for the orange tree pollination, then up to Georgia for pollinating the peach trees. By the end of the year, the hives are stressed from so much movement, and have produced enough honey to survive from pollinating so many different crops, but have sampled so many different pesticides from so many different fields that it is upsetting their ability to naturally adapt.
Bees are insects. They have hives, and can survive in any local and be immune after a few generations of any pesticide. Their ability to genetically adapt to their environment is explained by the fact that they have been around for millions of years. The average life of a worker bee is three months, so you should be able to see that a hive is a constantly reproducing organism, and the queen is the one responsible for that.
Tainted pollen (treated Monsanto grain) from many different crops across the US, is arriving back at the hive, and the queen bee, who is fed by the drone bees, are feeding her what the worker bees bring back to the hive.
The hives that can't deal with the influx of unnatural contaminants go CCD. The hives that can survive, do.
It's startling to know that queen bees are being super-ceded (replaced) about 4 times a season. That means they are replacing "their leader" every few months. It takes a fresh queen 27 days to start laying, so what I'm seeing is with CCD, is the queen becomes tainted, she gets replaced, and the new queen is replaced a month later. A healthy hive has a queen that lasts at least 3 years, and on the outset, 7 years of productive laying.
It's already proven that a CCD hive leaves the queen dead in the hive, with only a few dead bees behind. The rest of the hive just "disappears". IMO, the hive creates a new queen, and she swarms with the rest of the hive, due to the hive being contaminated from excess pesticides/herbicides/foreign material in the hive.
Originally posted by Druid42
reply to post by Phage
...
Yes, my point, infected bees. Are they really going think that after multiple inspections the bee inspectors were lying for the benefit of Monsanto? Or that the state WOULDN'T step in when there was a well-defined violation of the law?
Bee inspectors are friendly and helpful. They also have cool air-conditioned suits!
Originally posted by reitze
Originally posted by Druid42
reply to post by Phage
...
Yes, my point, infected bees. Are they really going think that after multiple inspections the bee inspectors were lying for the benefit of Monsanto? Or that the state WOULDN'T step in when there was a well-defined violation of the law?
Bee inspectors are friendly and helpful. They also have cool air-conditioned suits!
reply to post by Druid42
You sound like a corporate bee keeper rather than someone keeping natural bees. That's sad how quickly you disrespected the guy in the OP-video who was actually keeping more natural bees that overcame not only AFB but also roundup.
Meanwhile I hear your ilk is having trouble keeping your bees alive. You fear AFB - and want to destroy every remaining natural hive that's got it even if those hives have contained it. Killing your competition even if it kills of the whole food supply of planet earth.
SHAME ON YOU - you're committing a crime against nature that stinks clear to heavan - you'll burn in hell with that mentality. And thus get to be the first on my ATS "rivals" list.
The foul-brood thing is over-done.
American Foul Brood (AFB), is caused by the spore-forming Bacillus larvae. It is very widespread and destructive as a bee brood disease. The larvae is a rod-shaped bacterium, and is visible only under a high-power microscope. Bee larvae up to 3 days old are infected by ingesting spores present in their food. Bee larvae less than 24 hours old are the most susceptible. Spores germinate in the gut of the larva and the bacteria begins to grow being nourished by the larva. Spores will not germinate in larvae over 3 days old. Infected larvae normally do not die until after their cell is sealed. As it grows, the vegetative form of the bacterium will die but not before it produces many millions of spores. And so, each now-dead larva may contain as many as 100 million spores. The disease only affects the bee larvae and it is highly infectious and deadly to bee brood.
My point is that the foul-brood thing happens in nature and hives that don't survive it (we had 1) die off
Other stronger hives DO survive it - and I had 1 of those too.
And its interesting how the bee-scouts know better than to try to take over a dead hive like that. So basically a foul-brood hive rots and that's about it.
A single scale can contain one billion spores, and it takes as few as 35 spores to trigger the disease. These scales are difficult to see and can easily be missed when purchasing used equipment. Colonies with high levels of AFB will have a foul odor similar to a chicken house. As more and more brood becomes infected and dies, the colony dwindles and eventually collapses.
Spreading the Disease : As the bees work removing the dead larvae and cleaning the cells, they move and distribute the spores right through the hive. Stored honey is also contaminated with spores. Eventually the hive weakens from the infection and loss of brood. Robbing will then easily occur and the diseased honey will spread through other hives and apiaries. Additionally, as the beekeeper works the hives, infected bee equipment will be removed and mixed and exchanged into other hives, infecting and spreading the disease. The AFB spores are extremely long-lived and resilient and can remain viable for 40 plus years in honey and beekeeping equipment. Thus honey from an unknown source should never be fed to bees, and used beekeeping equipment should be considered a risk.
Treating AFB : Spores are generally present in every hive. Once diseased larvae die within the hive, millions of spores are released. Antibiotics and drug treatment may be used accordingly to the particular country's laws. However resistance is a problem, and some countries which have adopted the rather radical method of requiring all AFB affected hives to be completely burned have successfully kept the disease under control
Similarly, using lady-bugs to control aphids seems smarter than roundup,
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by reitze
Similarly, using lady-bugs to control aphids seems smarter than roundup,
You're right.
Roundup (glyphosate) is a herbicide. It is not used against aphids or any other insects.
edit on 5/31/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)