posted on May, 28 2012 @ 12:24 AM
reply to post by ForceMaster
lets start with your first real problem with this thesis and see where you go from there.
Yes, the mother/son cult you find in todays RCC is gleaned from this model.
No, Horus was resurrected in his birth from Osiris death. Horus was the resurrection, Osiris was the death. And his body was dismantled by the council
of 70, which was done to prove that he, Nimrod/Osiris did not fulfill the prophecy of the annointed one to come where it was said "not a bone would be
Can you get past this part? So, Horus was never dead and resurrected, he was supposedly the resurrection.
And Osiris was chopped up into pieces and the parts were sent to all the different lands to prove he was a poser. Semiramis/isis gathered up all the
parts to resurrect him but all the parts were found but the phallus, hence the monuments of it in obelisks. She being the sorceress she was could not
resurrect him so she claimed Horus was the resurrection.
So, you must show me where the mother/son cult of babylon and the resurrection of Horus is not simply horus being claimed AS the resurrected Osiris
before we can get past your very dirst assumptions for us to believe your storyline because it does not align with what you are selling based on what
Oh, the Bible tells in the Old testament the Earth is a suspended circle, not flat and the Mazzaroth predates all the stories and is most likely where
all the messiah stories originated. Add to this the problems dating history with the black periods of Egyption history that seriously messes up all
the timelines used to get your theory. Before I look at your webpages and spend my time, have you addressed these isues?
edit on 28-5-2012 by manna2 because: (no reason given)