It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PluPerfect
reply to post by Human_Alien
This is also completely wrong:
No one knows jack squat about astronomy.
I'd suggest taking some time to actually study the science of Astronomy, and get involved in order to better comprehend it.
Originally posted by PluPerfect
reply to post by Human_Alien
This is not scientifically accurate.....such a "belief" is factually incorrect:
....... believe it a rogue star like (I believe) Jupiter actually is.
.......... It's a planet and a star. Just like (I believe) Jupiter is.
Jupiter is most certainly not a star!
And, there is no such thing as a "rogue star" within our Galaxy, another galaxy, or other group of stars. The sole (astronomy) definition of a "rogue star" is when a star happens to exit a galaxy or other star cluster and "go it alone" in inter-galactic space. Based on our (the Earth's, and Solar System's) current location within our "Milky Way" Galaxy, any such "rogue" that may or may not exist outside the Galaxy would be hundreds, if not thousands of light-years away, at minimum.....certainly would be no influence on Earth in my, or your, or anyone else alive today lifetimes!
Back to Jupiter.....by no stretch of any definition can it be considered a "star". Any first-level Astronomy student could affirm this fact.....heck, even a grade-school science class curriculum worth its salt will as well.
There is a well-defined minimum mass required to define the smallest of stars....this can be easily researched, by utilizing an Internet connection, a computer and a keyboard, and an Internet Search Engine utility, such as 'Google' or 'Bing', etc..........
they are always finding new things and some with extreme orbits like Sedna, which is pretty bright but it was not found for a very long while..
They have found planets with no sun...
Scientists may have discovered planets without a solar system
Actually I read a Harvard study by two scientists who did in fact use all three names. i will look for it.
Take a look at a list and dates of found new objects...they are still finding things and yes some near and some far from us.
Sedna's exceptionally long and elongated orbit, taking approximately 11,400 years to complete, and distant point of closest approach to the Sun, at 76 AU, have led to much speculation as to its origin.
en.wikipedia.org...
We find new things and then we change what we believe is possible as we have to add this new information.
I find it very odd when people use the word "impossible" after all we have seen become possible.
There are star system where they DO orbit around one another. Pleiades comes to mind.
I find it very interesting and amazing what this guy is finding and figuring out.. debunkers are debunkers.. always will be rational small mind people trying to understand the universe and everything in it with a judgmental point of view.. thats fine.
Hiding rogue in Nebulas is pretty genious.. but what would the occupants of this space-vessel be hiding from (presuming you have an open mind that is) ??
If its humans and Earth they hiding from that is very strange to even think about; humans are dumb, have no-great technology, not even an advantage when it coems to space technology.. The collective human mind is very ignorant and blind.. so why hide ?? If it would be these beings who have manipulated the beings of planet Earth for eons.. its pretty pathetic and weak to hide around in the cosmos playing cat and mouse against our un-developed technology.. Maybe its something on Earth that they can not conform too ? THe enviroment is too alien to them, they cant be here for long, also the Sun could be a threat to their health... so many wonders, so many ideas... I hate being in the dark about the truth.. time will tell i suppose
You're right but that's due to all the rumors and confusion the past several decades.
Planet X is the modern name for the ancient planet called Nibiru.
But it's believe it a rogue star like (I believe) Jupiter actually is.
So it sounds like its a bit of both. It's a planet and a star. Just like (I believe) Jupiter is.
Obviously no one knows but on the other hand, sure seems a lot of people 'know' it's not out there though. Interesting paradox, huh?
No one knows jack squat about astronomy. Science only THINKS they do! Just ask a quantum physicist!
Guaranteed that in 100 years, science will have had it all wrong.
They once thought all planets needed a star until they found orphan planets.
Believe what you want and get stuck in your ideologies. This is how NOT to progress.
Jupiter is closer to a star than a planet. The only thing we use to define a planet is its orbit around a star.
There are star system where they DO orbit around one another. Pleiades comes to mind.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Human_Alien
Guaranteed that in 100 years, science will have had it all wrong.
Care to give us an example of science getting it all wrong?
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Human_Alien
Guaranteed that in 100 years, science will have had it all wrong.
Care to give us an example of science getting it all wrong?
Yes. Gravity is now suspected to be much faster than the speed of light. Just one example. There are many other examples on this website:
metaresearch.org...
And in fact the first paragraph completely contradicts many of your statements that our scientists and astronomers have everything under control:
"Something has gone wrong in the field of astronomy. Many widely held beliefs fly in the face of observational evidence. Theories go through such contortions to resolve inconsistencies that the ideas can no longer be explained in simple language. Alternative ideas are often rejected out of hand simply because they challenge the status quo. The result... many of today's theories are unnecessarily complex."
And this is coming from actual scientists who are recognized in the field of astronomy, not opinions of anonymous posters who for all we know could be overzealous 15 yr olds.