posted on May, 27 2012 @ 02:11 PM
reply to post by digitaltruth
would you still say that sacrificing innocent civilians just to kill a few enemies is just a regettable fact we have to accept?
Nope not atoll, actually that is a rather silly question in my view but to answer you.
I would be screaming for revenge, looking for a public enquiry eventually leading to criminal prosecutions that would have all of those involved in
my families deaths right up the chain of command being sentenced to death. That is assuming I don’t get to them first, because then I would do my
best to deliver that judgment myself, without the jury.
However that is only because I would then personally involved, right now I can be very objective on how I view this. What I have said is correct,
collateral damage is an inevitability of this type of warfare. The benefit of being entirely non-bias when looking at a story like this is that I can
pass a rational judgement that is free from bias. If I were to be personally involved in such a tragedy then I would lose that benefit.
I am sorry if you find my views on this difficult or cold but they are not going to change.