It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crimsongod21
reply to post by prevenge
you stated in your previous post
i'm gonna be all safe and sound choppin zombie heads while you run by screaming insanely.
I have to ask, with what we know about zombies and the fact that there bodily floods being the main carrier for the zombie virus why would you want to be close enough to them to cut off there head????
This raises another quandry that i have always had. When ever you see a "zombie freak out kit" why is it that almost always the person has multiple knives, swords and other close quarter weapons? It all seems like a very good way to end up zombiefied to me.
Just a quick question please feel free to respond at your will.
thank you and good day/night depending on your location in this world.
Originally posted by popsmayhem
Originally posted by prevenge
k so 3-4 pages of this thread and it's all sh@#ts and giggles from the peanut gallery and no concern from ANYONE about the state of the individual who was BITTEN (his face chewed on) who is now in the hospital.. among other people...
what if the individual attacking him was infected with something that caused his behavior....
and now the bitten individual is incubating something from the attacker...
but no.. that's just all fantasy hollywood BS right...
only too late do you realise...
you succumb to absolute ignorance..
AAAAAAAAAH run for the hills!!
I'm succumbing to the ignorance,
its taking over like a wolf in the night
This is very serious, but the victim
is alive and well, and I heard a little to
raw for the dead guy who was eating face..
WE WILL BE OK GUYS I PROMISE NO ZOMBIES
edit on 27-5-2012 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by stupid girl
Armando Aguilar, who heads the local chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, said he has spoken with the officer who responded. Aguilar said the officer saw what the man was doing, and ordered him to stop. He said the man growled at the officer, and then returned to his meal.
Aguilar said the man ate his victim’s nose and eyeballs.
The officer then used his service weapon and shot the man, Aguilar said, but the gunshot had no effect.
Other sources confirmed that the man refused to obey, and continued his attack. Aguilar said the officer had no choice but to keep shooting until the attacker was dead.
The surveillance video supplied to CBS4 by The Herald under a news sharing agreement is disturbing. At one point, whomever was controlling the cameras zoomed in to the two men lying nude and partially obscured by the MetroMover track. One man is motionless, but the other, presumably the man whose face was attacked, can be seen flailing his legs, possibly in pain.
The Herald used video editing tools to obscure portions of that man’s body as he moved.
The video covers a time frame of about 8 minutes, but despite the shooting of the attacker and the obvious distress shown by the victim, paramedics are not seen attempting to rescue him.
Growled at the policeman.
Ate the man's nose and eyeballs.
I really have nothing else to say at the moment...
Originally posted by stupid girl
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I mean, really?
People on crack don't growl.
People on coke benders don't growl. Talk a lot and fidget, but growl?
I don't believe this man was on drugs. I think the only reason they are speculating on drug use is because they simply have no other way to explain this man's behavior.
It was "drugs" is the only legitimate way they can explain something that they don't understand without appearing crazy themselves.
The cops were SCARED OF THIS MAN. The paramedics WOULDN'T EVEN GET CLOSE AFTER HE WAS SHOT AND DEAD!!
Originally posted by Lord Jules
reply to post by doodles40
Drugs are a possibility but why hide the name of the officer, victim, and attacker? And as yet there is NO PROOF of a face getting eaten since the whole thing was curiously hidden by a concrete wall. All I can be sure of is this is propaganda, a classic where, when, but no who, why, or how, and the 'what' has no proof to back it up.