It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Theprimevoyager
I prefer to believe in humanity.
But that has let me down since the day I was born.
Im not sure children can grasp the meaning of all that, so I wouldn't see it as that big of a problem. As adults we are more capable of chosing what we pledge allegiance to.
Educating the population is a national security issue (we need some people whom know how to work nuclear reactors sort of thing) and an economic imperative (unless we want to be the dirt farmers of the world). So, it became mandatory...that is an argument (why should the state tell me to teach my child anything)... land of the free indeed. Evolution does not require a belief system. It was taught to me, in a catholic school, like this: This is the current theory of evolution based on scientific uncoverings. the picture is not complete, and it may be incorrect, but the best understanding we have today is as followed...(then something about monkeyfrogs and turtlebunnies...don't remember the specifics). We were allowed to question it (and many did). So, to answer the question..yes, state interests do overrule your right as a parent in some aspects of your raising (but I want my daughter to watch porn all day! She needs to please her man when she gets married!....ya, that just sounds wrong..time to bring in the state and question your fathering ability). Ya, I just dropped the porn defense (when you don't understand something, mention kids and/or porn and you win the debate). The criteria is the same though...agreeing or disagreeing on the concept of requiring education itself is a completely different discussion. I am personally for it, but do acknowledge there are oppositions based strictly on ideals...still, I would rather have a slightly authoritative nation of moderately educated people than a free nation of morons.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by SaturnFX
You have the freedom to walk away if you do not want to hear what we have to say, there's your freedom from religion. Stick your fingers in your ears and walk away.
If you obtained "freedom from religion" then all churches, synogogues, mosques, buddhist temples, masonic lodges and well....even soup kitchens and food pantries for the poor would have to be burned down. Not constitutional by any means so, no you do not have freedom from religion.
If we can feed your sorry ass when you're broke and destitute you can at least sit and listen to stories about Jesus, it aint gonna kill you.edit on 26-5-2012 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by SaturnFX
It is a religion, it is stated as a faith by its proponents, the authors were Unitarians(thats a church if you didn't know) and faith is very much a part of it. Did you not read the very words I posted which were written by them? Are you in a state of denial over it simply because to fight Christians they had to say they were not a religion?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Perhaps to make my point a bit clearer, the Pledge was one of the original targets of Progressives.
...I am allowed to pick the wisdom out of books without becoming a full blown worshipper
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Perhaps to make my point a bit clearer, the Pledge was one of the original targets of Progressives.
So you are saying what they now oppose they once promoted?
It is hard to fix a specific starting date for the progressive race to the Great Society,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “but a good guess might be 1888, the year [when socialist] Edward Bellamy's novel Looking Backward burst on the American scene.” Set in the year 2000, this futuristic book depicts a utopian society run with the hierarchical efficiency of a military battalion. All workers in this idealized world belong to a unified “industrial army” that labors within the confines of an economy controlled by a coterie of central planners
Bellamy's book became immensely influential, selling hundreds of thousands of copies. It was particularly effective at setting afire the hearts of idealistic young people who were moved by the author's vision of a socialist utopia. All across America, “Nationalist Clubs” were formed to advocate for “the nationalization of industry and the promotion of the brotherhood of humanity.” Bellamy presented his utopia as a forum for the genuine expression of Jesus Christ's teachings. The author's cousin Francis Bellamy, a Baptist minister who penned the “Pledge of Allegiance,” shared this perspective, as he stated forthrightly in a sermon titled “Jesus, the Socialist.”
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Perhaps to make my point a bit clearer, the Pledge was one of the original targets of Progressives.
So you are saying what they now oppose they once promoted?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Yes... from all of them except the extremist fundamentalist evangelical cultists who thump the bible instead of reading it then shove it down your throat against your will while telling you that you will burn in hell for
I have yet to walk down a street and have Christians do that to me against my will. You know the old cliche, just say NO and walk away. Maybe you meant the JW, in which case I have found that placing a statue of Buddha on the front porch works very nicely. JW is cultish anyway and does not classify as a traditional church.
I do however remember many years ago, the ISKCON people used to prowl around streets and shopping malls hawking their books on Krishna Consciousness. Actually those books have marvelous pictures in them and are great interpretations of Hindu scripture. I still have one I think.
I have no issue with public school offering religious classes as electives that parents and students choose (and supported by parents and students via monthly fee's for such classes..or they can just teach them themselves after school).
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Ummmm okay, you still have the option to NOT watch Fox news. There's always CNN(communist news network) or msnbc, I think that's where you can catch such nauseating commentaries from the likes of Schultz and Maddow, although between the two I prefer Maddow but sometimes watch Schultz if I feel like driving my blood pressure up unexpectedly.
I don't know what to tell you if you live in a Red State. I suppose if you feel that strongly, you could move to Seattle or oh Connecticut maybe. How about District of Columbia. It's blue.edit on 27-5-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
I never make the mistake of thinking this is a free country. We have liberties, we gave up many freedoms in order to establish security. I am personally more concerned about liberties being given up for security, not freedom. Pure freedom is anarchy, and that is as bad as democracy
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Ummmm okay, you still have the option to NOT watch Fox news. There's always CNN(communist news network) or msnbc, I think that's where you can catch such nauseating commentaries from the likes of Schultz and Maddow, although between the two I prefer Maddow but sometimes watch Schultz if I feel like driving my blood pressure up unexpectedly.
I don't know what to tell you if you live in a Red State. I suppose if you feel that strongly, you could move to Seattle or oh Connecticut maybe. How about District of Columbia. It's blue.edit on 27-5-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Oh, I don't watch the trashy fox news, just using it as the example to explain to you who the cultists are who try to shove their beliefs down the throats of others
Nah, I'm in a swing state, I have to stay here to keep them on track...you know, red+blue = purpleedit on 27-5-2012 by PurpleChiten because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Ummmm okay, you still have the option to NOT watch Fox news. There's always CNN(communist news network) or msnbc, I think that's where you can catch such nauseating commentaries from the likes of Schultz and Maddow, although between the two I prefer Maddow but sometimes watch Schultz if I feel like driving my blood pressure up unexpectedly.
I don't know what to tell you if you live in a Red State. I suppose if you feel that strongly, you could move to Seattle or oh Connecticut maybe. How about District of Columbia. It's blue.edit on 27-5-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Oh, I don't watch the trashy fox news, just using it as the example to explain to you who the cultists are who try to shove their beliefs down the throats of others
Nah, I'm in a swing state, I have to stay here to keep them on track...you know, red+blue = purpleedit on 27-5-2012 by PurpleChiten because: (no reason given)
Wow so speaking their mind on a tv show is cultish and forcing you to listen to them huh. I thought it was freedom of speech, but what do I know.
Really, I have to bite my tongue ....