It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rickymouse
I know that the trees can communicate. I can't prove it but I know they can. I put my wireless wire tester on a tree and the signal was found in the branches of trees twenty feet away. It had a better signal than testing a wire on a car. The woods have intelligence not necessarily a single plant.
Originally posted by Unity_99
They are connected to the source field that holds us all in and eyes that see are not corporal.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
I looked into this after I saw it, and I read that plants even respond out of wind path, so whatever signal they release it reaches out in all directions and is not carried on the wind.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
It's fascinating, it proves awareness and communication, and it could even be argued that it indicates awareness of a community too.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Why warn other plants? Does that indicate some form of emotive response?
Originally posted by hadriana
Once I sat at an amusement park and realized that the trees were all bending away from the rides where there was a lot of screaming.
Originally posted by rickymouse
I know that the trees can communicate. I can't prove it but I know they can. I put my wireless wire tester on a tree and the signal was found in the branches of trees twenty feet away. It had a better signal than testing a wire on a car. The woods have intelligence not necessarily a single plant.
Originally posted by PieKeeper
If you can't prove it, then how do you know? Your "experiment" doesn't imply conscious communication at all.edit on 8-6-2012 by PieKeeper because: My text is being weird?[/font]edit on 8-6-2012 by PieKeeper because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hadriana
Knowing, intuitively, IS worth something. Its a real fallacy, IMO, to say that only quantifiable information is of any value. If you support science, then why would you be discouraging to someone that is trying to use a bit of methodology to confirm his intuitive hunches? A lot of the best science was done doing just that.
en.wikipedia.org...
The cannabinoid receptors are a class of cell membrane receptors under the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily.[1][2][3] As is typical of G protein-coupled receptors, the cannabinoid receptors contain seven transmembrane spanning domains.[4] Cannabinoid receptors are activated by three major groups of ligands, endocannabinoids (produced by the mammalian body), plant cannabinoids (such as THC, produced by the cannabis plant) and synthetic cannabinoids (such as HU-210). All of the endocannabinoids and plant cannabinoids are lipophilic, i.e. fat soluble, compounds.
There are currently two known subtypes, termed CB1 and CB2.[5][6] The CB1 receptor is expressed mainly in the brain (central nervous system, CNS), but also in the lungs, liver and kidneys. The CB2 receptor is expressed mainly in the immune system and in hematopoietic cells.[7] Mounting evidence suggests that there are novel cannabinoid receptors[8] that is, non-CB1 and non-CB2, which are expressed in endothelial cells and in the CNS. In 2007, the binding of several cannabinoids to a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in the brain was described.[9]
The protein sequences of CB1 and CB2 receptors are about 44% similar.[10] When only the transmembrane regions of the receptors are considered, amino acid similarity between the two receptor subtypes is approximately 68%.[4] In addition, minor variations in each receptor have been identified. Cannabinoids bind reversibly and stereo-selectively to the cannabinoid receptors. The affinity of an individual cannabinoid to each receptor determines the effect of that cannabinoid. Cannabinoids that bind more selectively to certain receptors are more desirable for medical usage.
Originally posted by rickymouse
I know that the trees can communicate. I can't prove it but I know they can. I put my wireless wire tester on a tree and the signal was found in the branches of trees twenty feet away. It had a better signal than testing a wire on a car. The woods have intelligence not necessarily a single plant.
Canplants read your mind?