Jim v. Jim: Two Opposing Views of UFOs

Originally posted by Jaellma
reply to post by JimOberg

 

Jim, what's your take on the Peruvian UFO encounter with Oscar Huertas? IYO, was it unexplainable? UFO qualified?

edit on 31-5-2012 by Jaellma because: (no reason given)

Even if he agreed with you, you think they'll just let anybody with an ounce of credibility step up on MSM and then go off about the legitimacy of ufo's and conspiracy theories? I don't think so.

The system is in place, and it would be difficult for anyone who didn't have orthodox opinions to cope in a fast career-oriented world where reputations count for livelihood.

They've been lying to you, FBI, CIA, US AF, Navy and keeping the biggest secrets of all times! If you don't do anything about it, they will continue to lie to you for another fifty years and a hundred years and will continue to belittle everything and imply that all people are idiots and they can't recognize something explainable when they see it.

What is the best way to look legit? Hide something for years because it couldn't be revealed instantly, declassify with trash information such as witnesses' claims - afterall how helpful is some claims - and then 'Did you see we declassified that information, we are the good guys?' Then they keep the real deal for themselves and that's why you will continue to see YouTube videos with balls of light, instead.