Really! The Chupacabra has been trapped and "identified" as "unknown" animal., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 03:42 PM by AFewGoodWomen
reply to post by reflexlm



No effin doubt.
What the hell were they thinking?
they may never find it again...or,
some redneck is going to hunt and kill the thing!

Stupid!



reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 03:44 PM by Dustytoad
reply to post by AFewGoodWomen


Looks like a kangaroo dog...

Whatever that is I have definitely never heard of it. Maybe it really is as claimed.

Very interesting.


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 03:47 PM by zerozero00
reply to post by AFewGoodWomen


Crazy to let it go without at least taking a DNA sample Duh!

It Could be dangerous to local indigenous species

It could also be a cat or a dog... Which is what I reckon it is, but without a DNA sample ..


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 03:49 PM by fairguy
reply to post by DisasterButton


According to someone in the YouTube comments its a thing called a Mexican Hairless, also known as a something which I cant remember how to spell


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 03:49 PM by AFewGoodWomen
reply to post by DisasterButton


Thanks for the update.
Smarmy much?...lol


Still, it could be The Chupacabra...it's just a mangy fox, but others will think it's the Chupacabra, thus misidentification is the root of my point.
edit on 24-5-2012 by AFewGoodWomen because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 03:52 PM by cranspace
reply to post by reflexlm




I feel like they should've done their best to identify the animal before they let it go


When it gets recaptured and it will to determine just what it is they will more than probably decide to look on the inside of it and
I doubt they would set it free after that
Looks like a rat with a foxes head to me

Cran


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 03:54 PM by DisasterButton
Originally posted by AFewGoodWomen
reply to post by DisasterButton


Thanks for the update.
Smarmy much?...lol


I didn't intend on coming off as being facetious. I was just denying ignorance. hehe.

But really, I have seen a coy-dog in my area with mange that looked similar to this fox. It can drastically change the look of any animal.


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 04:00 PM by Aliensun
Originally posted by DisasterButton
This video is old. The animal has since been ID'd as a fox with mange. Just took me a quick google search to find the info. Come on people! lol.

www.cbsnews.com...
edit on 24-5-2012 by DisasterButton because: Added Link


That is no oridinary North American fox.
I doubt that it is even a fox.
The snout is too long, like a deer.
The ears are too large for a fox, like a deer.
The rear body is too heavy for the rest of the body and not at all like a deer or fox.
...Say, where is Ft. Dietich from there?



reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 04:22 PM by Praetorius
Originally posted by AFewGoodWomen
The day that many have been waiting for!
WOW!


www.liveleak.com...

Whatever that/those things actually are, it's not a chupacabra. Somehow those things started getting called chupacabra, but the original accounts of chupacabra are quite a bit more crazy:
The most common description of chupacabras is a reptile-like being, appearing to have leathery or scaly greenish-gray skin and sharp spines or quills running down its back. This form stands approximately 3 to 4 feet (1 to 1.2 m) high, and stands and hops in a similar fashion to a kangaroo. In at least one sighting, the creature was reported to hop 20 feet (6 m). This variety is said to have a dog or panther-like nose and face, a forked tongue, and large fangs. It is said to hiss and screech when alarmed, as well as leave behind a sulfuric stench. When it screeches, some reports assert that the chupacabras' eyes glow an unusual red which gives the witnesses nausea.
(Wikipedia)

Calling this thing a chupacabra is much too like calling a cicada a locust in my opinion. All too common, but totally different critters.


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 04:31 PM by Blarneystoner
Looks like a fox with Mange.... or a Coyote.

Google Images

Not surprising that the Hospital workers couldn't ID it... they aren't exactly experts.


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 04:32 PM by GuidedKill
Originally posted by DisasterButton
This video is old. The animal has since been ID'd as a fox with mange. Just took me a quick google search to find the info. Come on people! lol.

www.cbsnews.com...
edit on 24-5-2012 by DisasterButton because: Added Link


That would have been my assumption. Glad you found the link because I wasn't going looking for it only to get into an argument about an mangie animal. Nice find....Good luck convincing the crypto crowd....


reply posted on 24-5-2012 @ 05:02 PM by oghamxx
reply to post by DisasterButton


I agree. I once had a pet fox which was kept in a large outside pen. When the temps got to 30 below with wind chill 60 below no one wanted to go to feed and water it so we brought it in the house. It was a major shock and it lost ALL of its hair in about 5 days. Looked identical to the video.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



ohio bigfoot carrying a stick
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
FB - Find Bigfoot announcement: "HUGE" new video coming Sept 10
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Huge, Hairy Giant Reported by Trio, Reviving Legend
  Posted 9 days ago with 7 member flags
Actual Bigfoot Footage!!??!!
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
"Sasquatch" They are real! Are they really here?
  Posted 16 days ago with 3 member flags
Rocky Mountains Sasquatch photo
  Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
The Texas Blue Dog
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags
GIANT worm found in China
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags