It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
The music industry is insane.
The gatekeeper model is dead. More and more we are seeing initiatives that are cutting out these money bleeders from the equation.
Websites like Kickstarter.com, which is providing a source of crowd funded content, much like ATS is crowd sourced content, and are changing the way that developpers, artists, musicians and a whole host of other industries receive funding for their projects.
Times are a changing, and companies will no longer be able to gouge us for content, when that content is NOT worth what they are selling it as.
Take music for example, you can't tell me a new CD is worht 25$ in store when I can pick up a digital copy for 13.99 on Itunes. What's the difference between the two copies? It's not like the digital copy cannot be hardcopied via CD's etc.
So these people really need to understand that content delivery systems have changed, people can no longer afford the gate keeper model and these people are NOT entitled to this money.
~Tenth
I think people who expect free music are freeloaders. The industry wont get the 70 trillion they seek, but hopefully it brings a message that will help stamp out piracy.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
The music industry is insane.
The gatekeeper model is dead. More and more we are seeing initiatives that are cutting out these money bleeders from the equation.
Websites like Kickstarter.com, which is providing a source of crowd funded content, much like ATS is crowd sourced content, and are changing the way that developpers, artists, musicians and a whole host of other industries receive funding for their projects.
Times are a changing, and companies will no longer be able to gouge us for content, when that content is NOT worth what they are selling it as.
Take music for example, you can't tell me a new CD is worht 25$ in store when I can pick up a digital copy for 13.99 on Itunes. What's the difference between the two copies? It's not like the digital copy cannot be hardcopied via CD's etc.
So these people really need to understand that content delivery systems have changed, people can no longer afford the gate keeper model and these people are NOT entitled to this money.
~Tenth
Originally posted by Bobaganoosh
In my humble opinion, bubble-gum/cookie cutter/tasteless crap music is what lost the record labels billions. Getting as far away from actual melody, the use of real instruments, the classic "starving artist" style, being about real music and not the money that making music makes, the list could go on forever. Blame hip-hop, blame wannabees.
I know, blame the record labels for putting out crap that nobody in their right mind would pay 20-25 hard earned bucks for. I would love to see every "artist" go entirely broke, lose all of their crap. Whoever was still playing music in some bar two or so years afterward has earned the right to be called a "musician".
It's crap like this that makes me put aside my passive nature and long for the day that every corporate executive and their team of attorneys are dragged out in the street and shot by the people they've bilked for the better part of a century now.
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984),[1] also known as the "Betamax case", is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the making of individual copies of complete television shows for purposes of time shifting does not constitute copyright infringement, but is fair use. The Court also ruled that the manufacturers of home video recording devices, such as Betamax or other VCRs (referred to as VTRs in the case), cannot be liable for infringement. The case was a boon to the home video market as it created a legal safe haven for the technology, which also significantly benefited the entertainment industry through the sale of pre-recorded movies.
Originally posted by KnightFire
First, I say good luck getting $72 billion in this market.
Second, being hypothetical, if they did get that $72 billion, I bet the record label companies would keep it all for themselves. They're use to jamming it to the artists.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Why don't they sue all the radio stations too?