It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Physicist: HAARP Manipulates Time

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:11 AM
link   

A brilliant physicist published a revolutionary paper citing 30 other scientific papers that reveal HAARP has incredible powers far beyond what most investigators of the high frequency energy technology suspect. Dr. Fran De Aquino asserts a fully functional HAARP network, activated globally, can not only affect weather and geophysical events, but influence space and gravity…even time itself! Now the network is almost complete with the activation of the newest HAARP facilities at the bottom of the world: the desolate and alien Antarctic. Will the masters of HAARP become the masters of time too?


Map of supposed HAARP facilities:


I´ll link you guys to the research paper in a minute.

First off i want to state i´m not very knowledgeable on HAARP and it´s capabilities but something about this article caught my eye.

First and foremost it references 30 other studies done on HAARP, many are peer-reviewed.

Second, i'd like to have some input from Phage or any other person who as knowledgde on HAARP. (i'm not calling you guys out here, i really appreciate your input in threads like these. Because the last thing i want to do is fearmonger)

Here goes.

The physicist in question:



De Aquino, whose paper High-power ELF radiation generated by modulated HF heating of the ionosphere can cause earthquakes, cyclones and localized heating, lifts the veil hiding the HAARP wizards—and unlike the erstwhile Wizard of Oz, the HAARP wizards have some real power at their disposal.


High-power ELF radiation generated by modulated HF heating of the ionosphere can cause earthquakes, cyclones and localized heating.PDF

HAARP can manipulate gravity


Most researchers of HAARP suspected for some time that the technology can trigger earthquakes and ignite hurricanes. De Aquino's paper tends to confirm those suspicions, but goes farther.

Utilizing high frequencies, he says, HAARP can modify, even control gravity by blocking gravity waves locally. De Aquino claims heavy objects can be moved, even transported by creating "gravitational shieldings."

But, the scientists stresses, HAARP can do even more. The ELF technology can generate "Gravitational Shielding Mantles which are made by layers of high-dielectric strength semiconductor sandwiched by two metallic foils and insulation layers. The Gravitational Shielding Mantle can be made so that it is only 1 millimeter in thickness."


Honestly this is jibberish to my ears, that's why i'd like some input from more knowledgeable people.


De Aquino's contention is actually supported by the experiments of another physicist, Dimitriou Stavros from the TEI-Athens, Deptartment of Electrical Engineering in Greece. Stavros successfully demonstrated an electromagnetic interaction with the gravity field.


Link to a detailed description of Stavros' experiment

an abstract from his experiment:

The period of the pendulum oscillations of a suspended electromagnetic resonant circuit formed by quarter-wavelength transmission line sections is found to be affected by electrical parameters of the oscillator driving it. Of particular influence appears to the magntitude of current at resonance, which depends on the effective quality factor (Q) of the RF tank circuit and the input driving power.


Lets carry on.

HAARP can control space and time


The analogy he draws envisions an ocean going vessel. He explains the ship "...is made of steel. When subjected to a uniform ELF electromagnetic field, with intensity and frequency the ship will perform a transition in time to another time. It is important to note that the electromagnetic field, besides being uniform, must remain with the ship during the transition to the new time. If it is not uniform, each part of the ship will perform transitions to different times in the future. In order for the electromagnetic field to remain with the ship, it is necessary that all the parts, which are involved with the generation of the field, stay inside the ship. If persons are inside the ship they will perform transitions to different times in the future because their conductivities and densities are different."


I'm sure some of you might noticed but i'll post this anyway


Remarkably, that is almost the exact scenario described by the alleged witness Carl Allende of the Philadelphia Experiment. Now widely regarded as a fabricated story, the early 1940s U.S. Navy experiment allegedly codenamed Project Rainbow





Believers of the story, however, claim that famed inventor and electrical genius Nikola Tesla assisted in the experiment that involved a naval escort vessel named the USS Eldridge.

The purpose was to create invisibility, but ended tragically when the ship was spatially transported and parts of it were trapped in temporal anomalies. It's strongly suspected that much of the HAARP technology is Tesla's work—updated and improved—and built upon the latest 21st Century scientific knowledge.

So, just what will HAARP be used for? Weather wars? Triggering geophysical events? Manipulation of gravity? Warping space-time? Some think the technology is already driving people mad.

Dr. Fran De Aquino, claims it's all of the above.


Anyone care to enlighten me and the rest of ATS.

Is this bunk or should we be scared?

source for article
edit on 24-5-2012 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:17 AM
link   
good thread, looking forward to discussion.

the map of haarp facilities says "supposed" facilities

are these privately owned or government owned ?

txs



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:23 AM
link   
A brilliant scientist indeed.




posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by syrinx high priest
 


This has already been posted and is most likely a hoax anyway.

Mods please delete.



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by CityFarmer
A brilliant scientist indeed.



Care to eloberate?


For several years, physicist Dr. Fran De Aquino worked as Senior-Researcher at the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE (National Institute for Space Research - INPE , Brazil) (INPE Registration Number 02844 CRN, SIAPE Registration Number 0024730). He was also Director of the INPE's Space Observatory in the city of São Luís, since the installation of this observatory until 1997.

Currently, Fran De Aquino is a professor at the Universidade Estadual do Maranhão- UEMA (State University of Maranhao, Brazil), (UEMA Registration Number 5155). He also works as Consultant in Science & Technology for international companies. Fran De Aquino's publications list includes several scientific articles and books.


he certainly isn't stupid as you're portraying him to be.



ETA:

Mathematical Foundations of the
Relativistic Theory of Quantum Gravity


Peer reviewed paper of De Aquino.

So he certainly knows some stuff about this subject.

published in the:

Pacific Journal of Science and Technology (USA) Volume 11. Number 1. May 2010 (Spring), (Physics),pp.173-232.


but i guess it's so much easier to do a fly-by post to try and discredit this physicist then actually come up with some valid arguments, huh?


edit on 24-5-2012 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:31 AM
link   
The naysayers arrived pretty fast. I´m currently reading the experiment page and its really easy to do for yourself if you put it on a precision scale. Its not impossible, but the circuit should be smd type because of HF. And you need a fast osziloscope, too.



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by QQXXw
reply to post by syrinx high priest
 


This has already been posted and is most likely a hoax anyway.

Mods please delete.


Lmfao.

I found the other thread so i will apologize for posting this again.

But how can you say it's a hoax after barely 14 replies in that thread?

None of them debunked any of his work and or findings.

The only debunking that was going on was for the pictures in that thread, which i found ridiculous in the first place.

Hence why i didn't post them.

Are you trolling?

What lead you to the conclusion that it's 'most likely a hoax'?

His findings don't support your view of what HAARP is capable of?

I'm more inclined to believe the work of a physician who has come forward with some respectable studies then that of an ATS fly-by poster.



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:39 AM
link   
You did a good job finding some solid research on HAARP. I have a physics background and I'm reading through the .pdf file, hopefully I'll report back with some findings. It is interesting so far, at least.



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by QQXXw
reply to post by syrinx high priest
 


This has already been posted and is most likely a hoax anyway.

Mods please delete.


I'm reading the .pdf file and so far it seems to be scientifically accurate and mathematically advanced, so I don't know where you are getting this hoax idea from... is there a new fad on ATS for deleting and closing down important threads for some reason?
edit on 24-5-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by darkbake
You did a good job finding some solid research on HAARP. I have a physics background and I'm reading through the .pdf file, hopefully I'll report back with some findings. It is interesting so far, at least.


Please do!

I'm interested in the opinion of some people who actually understand what he is talking about.

I also hope the MODS don't mind this second thread.

The other thread focused on debunking some lousy pictures, not one post was about the findings of De Aquino.

I hope we can have a second shot at that here.

ETA:

This thread also digs a little deeper by linking to other peoples research.

So once again i hope that the MODS will be forgiving here and let this one go.


edit on 24-5-2012 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by darkbake

Originally posted by QQXXw
reply to post by syrinx high priest
 


This has already been posted and is most likely a hoax anyway.

Mods please delete.


I'm reading the .pdf file and so far it seems to be scientifically accurate and mathematically advanced, so I don't know where you are getting this hoax idea from...
edit on 24-5-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)


Just read his posts in this thread and you'll see that's a baseless opinion.

Just trying to derail a thread before it even lifts off and picks up speed.



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:44 AM
link   
if haarp manipulates time, what you think cern (large hadron collider) is doing?



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:44 AM
link   
reply to post by kn0wh0w
 


Thanks. This will take me a while to get through and I haven't gotten any sleep yet tonight. But I will do an overview right now. There are 7 sections and I am getting tired, so I have only glanced over the first 2. There are interesting formulas and ideas in this paper, it might be possible that whoever wrote this paper invented new technology and ideas because he thought HAARP was using it already.

Section 1: Introduction)
This is an overview. Basically, it explains what HAARP is used for, which is generating electromagnetic radiation at extremely low frequencies (ELF). To do this would normally require an extremely long antenna in order to set up the extremely long wavelength required to produce the ELF.

However, this can be bypassed by heating the ionosphere using high frequency radiation - this somehow produces ELF electromagnetic radiation. We can get into that more later.

Section 2: Gravitational Shielding)
This section explains the concept of gravitational shielding. In the last decade, a new formula was generated that explains the difference between inertial mass (f = m*a), which is used to calculate force, and gravitational mass, which is used to calculate gravitational force. The formula basically states that when the change in momentum is 0, there is no difference between the inertial mass (how much stuff the object has) and the gravitational mass (used to determine how much the object weighs). However, the higher the change in momentum gets, the less the object weighs.

This means that the faster an object accelerates, the less it weighs. Normally, the change in momentum would have to be extremely high to have any noticeable difference.

It turns out that that it is possible to create high acceleration by using electromagnetic radiation. Note that this does not mean the object has to move very far - since it would be possible to keep the object accelerating indefinitely by moving it back and forth at a high speed (its velocity would change from + to -, thus causing acceleration). So basically, the high-frequency electromagnetic radiation generated by HAARP super-heats particles, causing them to have high acceleration values.

The gravitational shielding comes into effect when (and yes this is possible the equations convinced me) the objects' weight (in this case I think they are referring to electrons in the ionosphere) become negative, and therefore, they counter-acts Earth's gravity.

The formula used for gravitational shielding is as follows:

Let Mg be gravitational mass
Let Mi be inertial mass
Let Mi0 be the original inertial mass
Let X be the ratio of them

X = Mg/Mi

Normally this would be 1, because the mass used to determine weight would be the same as the mass used to determine the amount of stuff the object has in it.

However, with high acceleration, this ratio can become less than 1 (meaning the object weighs less) or negative (meaning the object counter-acts Earth's gravity and provides gravitational shielding for everything below it).

Multiple gravitational shields can be placed on top of each other, for example, if there were two of them, the gravitational mass of everything below it would be X1*X2*(the original gravitational mass of the object) where X1 is the ratio in the first shield and X2 is the ratio in the second one.





edit on 24-5-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:48 AM
link   
reply to post by kn0wh0w
 


Should have elaborated you're right.
I'm not saying he's stupid. He's probably waaaaaay smarter than I am.
BUT wouldn't all his knowledge be more useful to solve other problems?

"Science" has become the henchman of madness.

Apologies if I hurt your feelings.

Peace
edit on 24-5-2012 by CityFarmer because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:53 AM
link   
reply to post by kn0wh0w
 


in the article that is linked on the main page not only does Aquino reference himself but he references an article that he published in a journal run by a non-accredited institution which is a borderline diploma mill.

The author is a crackpot fraud and you are falling for his hoax.

edit on 24-5-2012 by QQXXw because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2012 @ 08:54 AM
link   
A thread on this topic is already available.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please add to the ongoing thread.

Closed.

~Tenth
ATS Mod



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join