It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by porschedrifter
You can never be to careful.
You never know when a ninja is going to strike.
The video from last Thursday showed three armed, masked men arriving in a red van, entering through the front of the house and then returning to the vehicle. Others dressed in what the sheriff called "ninja garb" went in through an unlocked utility door in the back. They were in and out in under 10 minutes.
The sheriff would not say what, if anything, was stolen.
Some of the nine children in the house at the time were sleeping, but several others saw the break-in, authorities said. One left the house and went to get a neighbor, who called 911.
"I think you'll find this particularly chilling and here's why: We have a team that enters at the rear of the home and another that enters at the front of the home," Morgan said. "It leads me to believe this was a very well-planned and methodical operation."
Today's arrests bring the total number up to six but Morgan said as many as eight people may have been involved.
Originally posted by luccadeo
I don't have an issue with this. She is in America and should abide by our laws.
Originally posted by snarky412
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by luciddream
You can practice religion, but when i see this i see domination of women, and as well as security threat.
Oh really domination of women? If a nun were to walk into that mall would they be forced to remove part of their garments as well? Because their religion is dominating them as well.
I always laugh when I hear security threat. People that say this has already let the terrorist win.
A Nun's face CAN BE seen......
The woman in the picture, her face is obscured which CAN NOT be seen nor identified if a situation called for it.
Mall security has their own rules to abide by. Either accept or shop some where else......
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by luccadeo
I don't have an issue with this. She is in America and should abide by our laws.
Our laws say freedom of religion. So what law is she breaking? Just because a mall says they won't allow something in no way makes a law.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by smyleegrl
These full face coverings should be banned throughout the Western world; those who do wear them usually are homegrown and do it to cause a stir. These women need to grow up and stop acting like stupid little children to get attention. I hate these full face coverings and there's no room for them in our world (except if a woman's face is severely scarred).
Originally posted by rival
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by luccadeo
I don't have an issue with this. She is in America and should abide by our laws.
Our laws say freedom of religion. So what law is she breaking? Just because a mall says they won't allow something in no way makes a law.
Once again, libertarianism ideologies solve the problem.
Let the MALL OWNERS decide if they want to allow people inside with their faces covered. It is their
mall after all. They can choose to allow, or not allow whatever they want....and then let the people
vote with their feet....if citizens exist that are scared of religious folks with their face covered they
can go to a mall where the rule is "no covered faces."
The system will police itself. If you run a bigoted or racially insensitive establishment where color
of skin, or religious garb, or whatever is disallowed by your establishment then you will either be
rewarded or punished financially according to popular appeal
Imagine a restaurant who decides not to serve Muslims or Jews....I for one, would not spend my money
there. Others may, but it would all still come out in the wash. If your establishment is too
bigoted, your establishment will fail...if your establishment is totally tolerant of all people, then only
people with no prejudice will feel comfortable spending their money with you. It is all give-and-take
based on society's values at the time...a reward and punishment (in real time), not subject to static
laws which do not change.
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Right so I am Pagan and some people beleive that full natural state of being is being unclothed, so we should let them walk into our malls naked then? If I tried that and said "It's my religion" I'd still be arrested for indecent exposure, I do realize there are colonies for nudists, but let's pretend there isn't just for this hypothetical. Now you see where the problem lies? Hell christians could actually follow this too, because it was only after they ( ADAM AND EVE) ate the apple in the garden that they saw they were naked and used coverings to hide their bodies!edit on 24-5-2012 by ldyserenity because: clarification