It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
This is not the Breaking News thread. His headline does not have to be the same as the articles headline.
Originally posted by 00nunya00
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
This is not the Breaking News thread. His headline does not have to be the same as the articles headline.
Scroll up.
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
Originally posted by 00nunya00
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
This is not the Breaking News thread. His headline does not have to be the same as the articles headline.
Scroll up.
Sarcasm.
Originally posted by lifeissacred
They didn't join it at all. They were escorting a planned protest and there was no threat of violence (hence no need for helmets). The same thing happens when the WBC have a protest or extremist groups have a planned march but that doesn't mean the police are joining the protest.
Similar non-planned 'occupy' protests in Frankfurt have been broken up by the police before. This is the way a protest should be done, in cooperation with the authorities instead of having a disorganized rabble show up unannounced and act like they own the place.edit on 24-5-2012 by lifeissacred because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Rosha
The source of the video which led me to post HAS the headline exactly as stated.
So where is that link? It's not anywhere in your OP.
Also, where is the proof in ANY of your links that the police 'joined' the march, as your headline claims?
Originally posted by 00nunya00
Originally posted by Rosha
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Rosha
The source of the video which led me to post HAS the headline exactly as stated.
So where is that link? It's not anywhere in your OP.
Also, where is the proof in ANY of your links that the police 'joined' the march, as your headline claims?
In the breaking news section it says to add ' your comments'..and I did..and it separated them into two posts - not my issue.
In the ' my comments' I linked to the you tube video directly. Again, an error of placement not a reason for such aggressive paranoia.
Rosha
It's not aggressive paranoia; there's a strict standard for BAN forum threads, and the exact title of the article you're quoting from is the biggest standard. The article you quote from is not titled such, your YouTube video in the opinions post is titled "#blockupy. Frankfurt am Main, 19. Mai 2012" and there's no headline like yours in any of the supporting links either. He's just asking where the title came from, especially because that would be the source to go to if we wanted to verify the veracity of your assertion that the police actually "joined" the march. It looks like they just took their helmets off while on an assigned march escort.
Originally posted by satron
It's nice to see where tyranny will exist and not exist in the future.
Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
Please change your misleading thread title.
No such thing as "Police joins Protest" has occured.
Your thread title is intentionally misleading.
ETA: Here is an actual Article frmo a German newspaper. It says the police is advancing on the protesters.
CLICK
They are using water cannons. Doesn't sound like "Joining the protest" to me at all.
edit on 24-5-2012 by H1ght3chHippie because: syntax
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Rosha
Secondly the headline isn't mine, its direct from the Occupy Montreal web site and it is being widely reported esp though police.net and through blockupy themselves as ' police joined the march'.
The headline from your 'source', as posted, is "20,000 people march at a Frankfurt Occupy protest: German police Read it on Global News: Global Winnipeg | 20,000 people march at a Frankfurt Occupy protest: German police"
In 'breaking' news you are supposed to use the exact headline as your source. Its also supposed to be no older than 36 hours. This is datelined 4 days ago.
I'd be interested to know why these cops have their helmits off and appear to be marching 'with' these protesters, but none of your cited articles make any mention of it beyond the one or two photos.