It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nerdyclutzyblonde
I don't know much about this type of vessel. The fact that it's a nuke has me a bit nervous.
Anyone out there with knowledge if this is a major nuclear hazard???
I know it's silly question. Bu. t if anyone could inform - that wpuld be fantastic!
Thank you!
www.seacoastonline.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by pheonix358
"The shipyard says the sub's reactor wasn't operating at the time of Wednesday evening's fire and wasn't affected."
That is pandering to the public! You can't 'turn off' a reactor. We should have learnt that by now.
This fire should have been out a lot quicker than it has been. I would suggest that major work is underway. All you have to do in a fire type SHTF scenario in a sub is to close all the hatches and wait for the O2 to run out. Why that has not happened yet is interesting. Even if the hull was open, a tarp covering the opening would be enough.
I am certainly not an expert but this is a sub!
P
Originally posted by pheonix358
At least I am not a dumb ass.
Originally posted by pheonix358
The tarp needs to be kept wet. That is how you put out a fire in a pot on the stove. Wet the tea towel, trow it over the pot, smothers fire.
Originally posted by pheonix358
The fire has been burning for what 6 hours. There is not that much air in a sub. I am not an expert...
Originally posted by pheonix358
.... but you sir are an offensive little drip under pressure!
Nuclear Reactors aboard US Naval Vessels are the safest reactor design in the world. There has never once been an accident with a Nuclear reactor aboard a ship or sub, they are that safe. Far safer than any reactor operating in any nuclear plant in the world.
They are pressurized water reactors, which are the most common power generation reactor - so they are based off the same design, which is actually a bad thing,
Originally posted by SarK0Y
reply to post by C0bzz
They are pressurized water reactors, which are the most common power generation reactor - so they are based off the same design, which is actually a bad thing,
PWR type is most safe design among old ones, but BWR's are real $hitty things anyway, we need new schemes like MSR
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by speculativeoptimist
From my limited knowledge from my Navy buddies . . . it would require a LIST of many impossible things to happen before such a forward fire would hazard the reactor.