Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath

I did not say such a thing and logical stupidity is strictly your deficiency. I just explained how people are manipulated and you come out with your asinine utterances. If you are going to be abusive at least have some semblance of intelligence or wit; offer me this charity will you!

You do not need people or institutions to be conscious of their contribution to get them to do something... get it?

edit on 12-6-2012 by MI5edtoDeath because: (no reason given)

I get that you think that a BBC news editor would receive an instruction to report something from - I don't know, who? Some MIB on the phone? - and just unquestioningly do it. And that everyone in the newsroom would just go ahead with it despite not knowing the provenance of the information. But that's a ludicrous belief.

And what's the point? Why have a script that you want reported at all? Why not just let them report the tower coming down when it does? Explain to me the reasons why the perps would want a 'script' adhered to?

It sounds to me like you think the BBC were manipulated into reporting the information by nefarious means. But even if the conspirators for some absurd reason wanted that done, are you suggesting they just tweaked a wire report and then it went out on the BBC? Because that sounds rather like what actually happened - an innocent mistake based on widely circulated firemen's reports that 7 was about to fall - and with no evidence whatsoever that the perps were involved, or that it would be desirable for them to have it reported.

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath

You do not need people or institutions to be conscious of their contribution to get them to do something... get it?

Is that why you're unaware of the fact that you're harming real people, who have done nothing wrong, with your stupid Witch Hunt.

Hold Your Pitchfork High and Wave It Proudly Witch Hunter !

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
No it does not. You are merely trying to push a possibility in to the impossible by overstating our position.

Shysters and conmen exploit human perceptions without having to do much.

Your position seems to include such extremities as divulging a script to a foreign publicly owned broadcaster. To faking debris impact and literally hiding a damaged jet engine in the middle of a crowded street and then unveiling it.

I don't believe I am overstating your position. I think that this conspiracy grows as you come across any evidence you can't explain, because it must be explained away. Again I ask, what guarantee did they have that the jet engines would not be recovered? Do you think it would be a reasonable risk to take?

How can I respond to all of you all the time? It is tiring especially after a long day at work and if I only responded to some it would be unfair to others.

Can I ask you OSer's to elect a spokesperson who you could message your queries? Then I would deal with him/her on a one on one basis without inadvertently offending others when I do not respond to them.

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath

I am wiping the floor with you OSers.

Yes you are.

It was very impressive how you proved oil is not used as a coolant in jet engines.

Hold your pitchfork high and wave it proud.

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath


"Tricky"! I am wiping the floor with you OSers.

Really, I have got to go...Cheerio!

Yes, your latest tactic of refusing to answer questions and posting that you're too busy to post is a sure fire winner.

Look out TPTB - MI5 is coming and he's got you licked.

Yes, this one's even better. Protest that you don't have to answer questions - as if we didn't know this - and then insist that, despite your 'choice' not to furnish responses, you are in fact "winning" the exchange.

Let me help you with this. Your view is not in the ascendant in general - look at the world and what it thinks. It agrees with me, not you. And your view is not carrying the day here either, partly because of your rightful but absurd refusal to engage in the discussion when it becomes too difficult for you.

The latter is allied to the former. Truthers' inability to produce a logical argument that can persuade people here goes some way to explaining why their ideas remain unable to convince a general quorum of the public. That doesn't look likely to change, does it?

Originally posted by waypastvne

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath

I am wiping the floor with you OSers.

Yes you are.

It was very impressive how you proved oil is not used as a coolant in jet engines.

Hold your pitchfork high and wave it proud.

Thanks for finally admitting your defeat and the ridiculousness of your statement that you pressurize liquids under high temperatures to stop it from boiling.

Hold your pitchfork high and wave it proud you truth destroyer. Oooooaaaaarrrrr!!!!

Originally posted by exponent

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
No it does not. You are merely trying to push a possibility in to the impossible by overstating our position.

Shysters and conmen exploit human perceptions without having to do much.

Your position seems to include such extremities as divulging a script to a foreign publicly owned broadcaster. To faking debris impact and literally hiding a damaged jet engine in the middle of a crowded street and then unveiling it.

I don't believe I am overstating your position. I think that this conspiracy grows as you come across any evidence you can't explain, because it must be explained away. Again I ask, what guarantee did they have that the jet engines would not be recovered? Do you think it would be a reasonable risk to take?

Very good questions you need to pose to your elected officials whom you pay through taxes to serve your needs.