Ok here's a question I have for you folks who feel they have studied 911 I'd really like to hear your thoughts.
Let's cast away some of the finer details for a moment and look at the slightly broader picture of the 9/11 conspiracies. One of the main issues with
a great majority of conspiracy 'hows' boils down to whether the collapse of the wtc buildings was an accident, or whether it happened on purpose. You
either fall into one category or the other. I am currently a believer of 'the collapse on purpose' theory, i.e it was a planned event - the towers
collapse was planned, expected and induced, for one reason or another which i will elaborate on later if anyone's interested.
The question I put to you is do you believe the towers collapse was purely an accident, or was it planned and brought about on purpose?
Can it be any other way?
If you think it was an accident, do you believe the official story too?
Also, if it's an accident do you believe there is any connection to the 1993 plot?
If you believe it was on purpose, perhaps try to explain why you think it couldn't be an accident but without referring to the actual use of
explosives or other demolition methods. I'll help you out later in the thread if you need some hints or if that doesn't make sense.
Also, is there anyone that believes it was on purpose but also believes the official story..?
edit on 23-5-2012 by Insolubrious because: (no reason given)