I've only just read the first page. I feel compelled to reply to the blibbering idiots that want to know, "What's your problem OP? You think they
Although its not as blunt as that, yes that's what they do! (Look no further than Bohemian Grove!)
I've got a thread in the works that is about secret societies, from how they formed, major points in history, how many pies they've got their fingers
in, up to what they do today.
I wasn't interested up until the other week, it was something I always over looked, however upon findin reoccuring names, organisations and ideoligies
that kept popping up in other lines of research, I was compelled in investigate.
So far, I havent strayed from already known history, and its already scary, before we even entertain the thoeries and "what ifs".
The history of these organisations is worrisome. As are their teachings, and activities.
It should more worrisome to think that all of these theoligions were some of the best minds universities could deliver, and they knowingly conspired
and spread there ideals and teaching infecting every other educational system and political system, and the rituals that they DO conduct are based on
the occult, old gods, and mystic energy, as the stonemasons utilised the power sacred geometry and earth forces they were infiltrated by the masons,
who were in turn infiltrated by the illuminati in 1776.
Think of the influencial people, and your founding fathers who were masons, and all the elite world wide who have stemmed from the same, if not
similar groups, no one can believe its merely coinsidence, that's foolish.
Its an elborate plan that's coming together, the "abolishment of all soverigne independant states" yet the preservation of heritage and monarchies".
Look at the symbolism in even the most standard and basic of the rituals, that most masons never believe could leave to evil, do they question what
the purpose of some superficial ritual is for anyway?
Messing ariund with skulls, bones, swords, coffins, blood... If that's not a little dark, excuse me!
edit on 23-5-2012 by Sinny because: (no