It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by snarky412
Well, it would be an understatement to say that Obama and his policies are controversial.
While I admit it was pretty brave of the Obama Admin to add the Vatican to
the list of top money laundering suspects....
www.catholic.org...
That may come back to bite him.
Originally posted by spiritualzombie
If the Church can control their flock, then the contraceptive option shouldn't even be an issue.
Originally posted by Badgered1
Play hardball. Offer the Catholic Church a deal: Either they provide full healthcare rights (including contraception) to all their paid workers, or they start paying taxes on all their property and earnings.
Play nice with workers rights, or lose your tax exemption.
We'll see which one they give up first. It will be amazing how quickly their dogma will waver once you threaten their coffers.
I'd love to see the records of the Catholic hospitals to see how 'charitable' they really are. I wonder how much profit comes from their hospitals.
Removing tax exemption from Churches/Ashrams/Mosques/Temples/etc. would provide more than enough funds for free, and first class healthcare to all.
Tax exemption for 'some' churches violates the first amendment. Otherwise ALL religions would have tax exemptions. Since there are refusals and exceptions made by the IRS, they are not respecting the establishment of all religions. There are laws that make exceptions. That's against the first amendment. It's either all or none. It's not all, so it should be none.
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by snarky412
Well, it would be an understatement to say that Obama and his policies are controversial.
While I admit it was pretty brave of the Obama Admin to add the Vatican to
the list of top money laundering suspects....
www.catholic.org...
That may come back to bite him.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by burntheships
Religion teaches faith in "God".
Obama wnts to replace "God" with government.
He started the fight, the padres are going to finish it.
Originally posted by spinalremain
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by burntheships
Religion teaches faith in "God".
Obama wnts to replace "God" with government.
He started the fight, the padres are going to finish it.
Obama doesn't want to replace God with government.
That statement is almost silly, Beezer
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by spinalremain
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by burntheships
Religion teaches faith in "God".
Obama wnts to replace "God" with government.
He started the fight, the padres are going to finish it.
Obama doesn't want to replace God with government.
That statement is almost silly, Beezer
On the contrary. I think he does. Really.
Liberalism and God
In late June 2011, Akin was discussing NBC's recent removal of the words "under God" from a video clip of the Pledge of Allegiance. Akin told radio host Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council that:
Well, I think NBC has a long record of being very liberal, and at the heart of liberalism really is a hatred for God and a belief that government should replace God.... This is a systematic effort to try to separate our faith and God, which is a source in our belief in individual liberties, from our country. And when you do that you tear the heart out of our country.
Two days later, Akin said in a radio interview there he would not apologize, since he meant that not all liberals hate God, only that liberals have "a hatred for public references for God." The next day, he said:
People who know me and my family know that we take our faith and beliefs very seriously. As Christians, we would never question the sincerity of anyone's personal relationship with God. My statement during my radio interview was directed at the political movement, Liberalism, not at any specific individual. If my statement gave a different impression, I offer my apologies.