It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
look at my name.
this means "as opposed to others"
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
*I* am a bad speller. yes *I* take offense. I also have a lot of common sense and see when people are choosing to take things as though it's a competition of intelligence.
It's about the issues, not how smart it does or does not make you look. Nobody is getting brownie points in here for being the best speller or using the correct made up term.
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
She was talking DIRECTLY to me when making two very moot points in the context of meaningless argumnt.
Furthermore, If a black person hears another black person get called the N word, does that mean they should say "oh, he wasn't talking to me"
trust me, I know how many errors I make and I also know how petty it is to get onto someone's spelling and If i want to state my opinion on that, I have every right.
Furthermore, I wasn't talking to YOU.
Get what I'm saying?
You wanna preach it, you PRACTICE it.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
look at my name.
this means "as opposed to others"
That's nice.... look at my name... it means "Purple Chiten"
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
look at my name.
this means "as opposed to others"
That's nice.... look at my name... it means "Purple Chiten"
Thanks for the giggle. You just made me spit out my iced tea.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Domo1
Also, can you explain to me (and the tone is not meant to be nasty I am genuinely interested) what bothers you about gay people calling it marriage?
Historically, legally and religiously marriage has meant a legal union between a women and a man. Not two men.
Can you explain to me why the historical, legal and religious meanings of the word 'marriage' should be changed to include same sex unions?
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
As for statements to others about bad spelling being a sign of intelligence, why would you even go there? A 65 year old should be familiar with the term "dyslexia" Other than expressing disappointment and discouragement for what I was thinking could be an interesting conversation, that's all I want to say.
HA HA HA
I'm not the one who started the little "slamola" diatribe game of "Who's Smarter then a 65 Year Old".
Nope - Nada - - - that would be the other guy.
I didn't want him to think he was playing alone.
Now I think you are being extremely paranoid.
If your feelings are getting hurt because I pointed out to you that small groups of communists do not work, it is simply because you mentioned communism after *I* mentioned it. You also used the term "mumble jumble" on the exact same page after *I* used "mumbo jumbo"... to indirectly correct me on two points. rather than taking offense I merely clarified my point by saying that only large groups of communism works, which is pretty much a fact for very obvious reasons.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
You do realize that she was talking to someone else about the spelling, right?
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
Isn't that generally the case for small government?...she says. Does it need to be repeated?
Originally posted by jupiter869
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Domo1
Also, can you explain to me (and the tone is not meant to be nasty I am genuinely interested) what bothers you about gay people calling it marriage?
Historically, legally and religiously marriage has meant a legal union between a women and a man. Not two men.
Can you explain to me why the historical, legal and religious meanings of the word 'marriage' should be changed to include same sex unions?
Because the world is always changing. When the world changes, we as a human society change and our rules, morals, ethics of what is right and wrong changes. We evolve. We grow. We mature. If we don't then we become stagnant organisms.
You can't go home again. You can't turn the hands of time backwards. And you don't want to... not really. It's not healthy. Grow with the rest of the world. Stop fighting what's inevitable. Toss aside your hatred. Forgive your parents for instilling it in you and learn to love the other human beings God put on this Earth.
It's what God wants you to do.
Originally posted by IndigoRing
reply to post by WhoKnows100
As I mentioned in my first post, I did not mention that I was gay and Christian because I wanted you or any other ATS member who does not know me at all to debate it. My relationship with God and my Christianity aren't the subjects of this thread - it's about why gay marriage could be interpreted as a conservative value.
Please understand that I presented my point, as you mention when you say "[he/me] argues his case on the grounds of financial equality," because financial conservatism and keeping "Big Government" of of people's personal lives are well-known conservative talking points. I used that particular bullet because it was relevant to the topic of the thread.
My apologies if I have mislead you or did not communicate my intentions clearly. If the topic was about discussing homosexuality and how it fits or does not fit into Christianity - which this thread is not - I'd have discussed it from a topic-appropriate perspective.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by IndigoRing
.
Its unfortunate the Fundamental Christian Right - - - (same group that denied black people rights) - - - has such influence over so many.
What's really so unfortunate is that you cannot understand where your OWN beliefs come from
Uh huh
Here are the 2 other posts of yours I found in this thread. And you quote Rense. And Overlords of Chaos overlordsofchaos.com...
Have you considered professional help?
Originally posted by Annee
What? Paranoid?
Odd how some people interpret another person's fooling around.
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
In every one of these cases, the world DID NOT change, but our beliefs did.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
In every one of these cases, the world DID NOT change, but our beliefs did.
Yes, our beliefs change, and it changes the world. For eons, slavery was an acceptable practice. God had no problem with enslaving people against their will, as long as we treated slaves a certain way. But we have done away with slavery. We now believe that slavery is an abomination. Our beliefs changed, and the world changed.
Jesus said not one thing against two people in a loving committed relationship. Gays who want to be married are in a loving committed relationship. This is a good thing. The anti-homosexuality passages in Leviticus are not part of the 10 commandments. They are part of the taboos and rituals that were Jewish laws (don't eat shellfish, don't wear clothing of two fabrics, don't eat pork, don't cut your hair a certain way, etc.) Jesus never said we had to abide by those taboos and rituals, and no Christian follows those taboos to this day. Jesus emphasized the Golden Rule -- love your neighbor as yourself. This is all we need to do.
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
Is that your typical response to truth?
I guess even the scarlet beast of Revelation doesn't prick your curiosity,
or that the mark of the beast is on the hand (actions) or forehead (mind/worship),
or that Communism around the world brutally slaughters millions of Christians and all who disagree with it's Godless state...
.
or that the creators of Communism doctrine are the very same who control and create the greatest form of indoctrination known to mankind - the media.
Truth is the dividing line - either you accept it or reject it.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Leviticus also was translated many times, altered in the translations and interpreted in different ways. There are a lot of interpretations out there and they all have different forms of support and "proof". Those who want to focus on homosexuality are going to interpret it differently than those who couldn't care less about homosexuality. People read into it what they want to and many battles are waged, many wars are fought and many lives are lost due to mere opinions of a person or group of people