It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by SpearMint
evolution would take an infinite amount of time just to get started.
Well you got that right ! How is it you have so much trouble nailing down exactly what you said ?
"Extremely slow process"
Your saying, " I didn't say that " isn't true. Do you wish to redact the statement so we can move on ?
Or explain how your ststement and mine are so different if you rather ?
Originally posted by SpearMint
First of all a mutation needs to occur, this is random and is not based on necessity.
If that were true then we wouldn't have evolved
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by SpearMint
You don't know what I'm on about ?
If that were true then we wouldn't have evolved
But you said it yourself.
or a random accident
Originally posted by squiz
Actually, All humans are born with the ability to drink milk. Lactose intolerance is actually the norm. The gene switches off in the case of lactose intolerance, as WAS the norm.
In other words we've always had the ability to ingest milk, it's not an emergent quality. It's just that in modern populations that can drink milk the gene has not switched off.
Evolution, as in new genes or new functional proteins it is not.
reply to post by Lionhearte
It still remains a theory,
Originally posted by SpearMint
That doesn't mean we always have, it means something in Lactose intolerant people makes it switch off. We know people couldn't before 7000 years ago due to DNA that has been collected, there is no debate there.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by SpearMint
Alright look I apologise for driving at you the way I have. Just trying to get you to understand that if you say something a certain way you have to be ready to hold to it. You can't deny you said something that you obviously did say. Nor can you change it. Not even in the slightest way.
You can't prove evolution explains existence and is how everything came to be, anymore than I can prove creation does.
Originally posted by squiz
Originally posted by SpearMint
That doesn't mean we always have, it means something in Lactose intolerant people makes it switch off. We know people couldn't before 7000 years ago due to DNA that has been collected, there is no debate there.
Well considering babies need to drink milk, I think yes we've always had it. If not when did this new gene arise?
How does the switching off of a gene equate to evolutionary advancement? We may be able to switch off other genes to gain other abilities but this is not evolution.
If we continue to switch off functions do we end up evolving into something else? a new species perhaps? I don't think so.