It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mitt Romney has invested his money around the world, from the Cayman Islands to Ireland to Australia. We don’t know if he’s using these accounts to avoid paying his fair share in taxes, but we do know that in 2010, Romney’s tax rate was a startlingly low 13.9%. This means Romney pays a lower tax rate than many teachers, firefighters, police officers, and other middle-class Americans—even a lower rate than most other millionaires.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by grey580
Romney pays that rate because it is earnings made from money ALREADY taxed.
Basically, Romney is being taxed twice. The first time on income earned. The second time, on invesment income earned.
If I made 100 dollars, and got taxed 30% then took the remaining 70 dollars ad invested it and made money, I get taxed an additional 13.9% on money that I made from the 70 dollars.
Everyone is focusing on the second tax and not on the first.
The first chart tallies up Obama's proposed spending and proposed "spending cuts" over the next decade. The spending is easy to calculate. The spending cuts are a little more dicey. Obama has said he will trim possible future debt by $4 trillion in this budget. About $1.5 trillion of that total will come from tax increases, so the other $2.5 trillion will come from foregone outlays
Originally posted by bl4ke360
How can anyone vote for Obama for that matter?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by bl4ke360
How can anyone vote for Obama for that matter?
How can anyone not?
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by grey580
Romney pays that rate because it is earnings made from money ALREADY taxed.
Basically, Romney is being taxed twice. The first time on income earned. The second time, on invesment income earned.
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by grey580
Romney pays that rate because it is earnings made from money ALREADY taxed.
Basically, Romney is being taxed twice. The first time on income earned. The second time, on invesment income earned.
You apparently don't know how private equity works? Romney BORROWS other peoples money and invests it and keeps a large hunk of the returns. He isn't double taxed. He even took 10 Million from the Government once in defaulting on a debt that didn't make a return. Other peoples money! Win Win!edit on 22-5-2012 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by grey580
Romney pays that rate because it is earnings made from money ALREADY taxed.
Basically, Romney is being taxed twice. The first time on income earned. The second time, on invesment income earned.
You apparently don't know how private equity works? Romney BORROWS other peoples money and invests it and keeps a large hunk of the returns. He isn't double taxed. He even took 10 Million from the Government once in defaulting on a debt that didn't make a return. Other peoples money! Win Win!edit on 22-5-2012 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)
Which deal was that ?
We need to expose these things.
Republican Senate nominee Mitt Romney’s rescue of a business consulting firm was achieved in part by convincing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to forgive roughly $ 10 million of the company’s debts, according to sources close to the deal and federal records obtained by The Boston Globe.
Romney, whose business acumen has been the cornerstone of his campaign, has said saving the Bain & Co. consulting firm from the brink of bankruptcy in 1991 was the accomplishment that most convinced him he had the mettle to be a US senator.
Facing financial duress, Bain Capital partner Mitt Romney was asked to rejoin and lead Bain & Co. as interim CEO. Bringing along two lieutenants from Bain Capital, Romney began a traveling campaign to rally employees at all Bain offices globally. Romney also negotiated a complex settlement between the Bain partnership and the firm's lenders, including a $10 million reduction in the $38 million Bain owed the Bank of New England,[10] which by that time had been seized by the FDIC and placed in Chapter 7 liquidation.
The Boston Globe pointed out that:
"Over several weeks, Romney managed negotiations with the banks and among the partners... The moment came when negotiations produced a package in which Bill Bain and the founding partners would give up control of the firm, turning back $30 million they had taken from the ESOP and $100 million in notes they held against the firm."
Bain & Company
Romney wrested control of the firm from the senior partners who had run it onto the rocks, and twisted their arms into returning more than $100 million in cash and securities. In return for his doing so, many of Bain’s creditors agreed to write down some of the firm’s debts