NASA editing another beautiful photo - Blacking out large sections

Take a look for yourself.. apod.nasa.gov...
One black out can be seen at the very top and in the middle.
The second black out can be seen in the bottom left hand corner, at the edge of the galaxy.

You cannot see the first blackout in the image below because the image is too large but you can see the one on the edge of the galaxy very well.

The funnel type shape of the second blackout is very unique and reminds me of 3d modellings often used for space related things

I put this in general conspiracies because I am not claiming anything just showing you what I have found. I find it interesting they feel they need to do this so often, I would love to see these images as they naturally are.

And this is the website the image is from (which I highly recommend):
apod.nasa.gov...

What do people think?

No offense, but no matter how hard I try, I can't see any blacking out.

reply to post by chrismicha77


Try along the left hand edge in the bottom half of the picture. Also a bit on the top edge, a little right of center.

Originally posted by HumanCondition
Take a look for yourself.. apod.nasa.gov...

Ok, I took a look for myself and read the words

it took 11 different image fields from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) satellite's telescope to produce this gorgeous portrait

Its a composite image.

Thats not all.
I've noticed many strips of 5 stars in row, also a few taking on distinct patterns that aren't too natural looking.

Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by chrismicha77

 

Try along the left hand edge in the bottom half of the picture. Also a bit on the top edge, a little right of center.

edit on 21-5-2012 by charles1952 because: Spotted more

How do we know that's not just a glitch in the image? Lets say that it is blacked out, why would they black out a huge section of space? It lacks any specific shape, which makes me lean towards something wrong with the image.

Originally posted by chrismicha77
why would they black out a huge section of space?

And you also have to wonder why they would bother.
The "Andromeda Galaxy" is one of the most photographed objects in space.
Although this is a good (composite) photo, seriously millions of photos have been taken of this galaxy and if there was anything secret there, its a fact that there is no way anyone, NASA, Illuminati, or TPTB, would be able to hide it.

reply to post by HumanCondition


Links are down.

reply to post by HumanCondition


Links are down.

Im not a spacecowboy.
Im not astronomer etc nor i know anything about that.
Anyway let me guess,
Mostly blackout areas of space photos is around orion belt,
Isis or some kind of that area like "space of gods" wich carry names of gods

Originally posted by alfa1

Originally posted by HumanCondition
Take a look for yourself.. apod.nasa.gov...

Ok, I took a look for myself and read the words

it took 11 different image fields from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) satellite's telescope to produce this gorgeous portrait

Its a composite image.

Take a look at the shape of the bottom left blackout...
Does not look very normal for a composite image.

Originally posted by DoctorMobius
Thats not all.
I've noticed many strips of 5 stars in row, also a few taking on distinct patterns that aren't too natural looking.

Could you please point out these stars?

Originally posted by HumanCondition
Take a look at the shape of the bottom left blackout...
Does not look very normal for a composite image.

It is pasted together from a bunch of circular images.

Edit
- various web pages put the field of view of the GALEX satellite to be 1.2 degrees wide.
- the andromeda galaxy is quite large, and extends to 4 degrees wide.
So, the GALEX satellite cannot see the whole thing, and requires pasting together a bunch of various images. The numbers above suggest that it takes a little more than three GALEX images to fit it in either width or height, which, looking at the original images posted, seems about right.

Something was obviously taken out, but what would have that shape?
Probably nothing.

Wow, talk about some lazy editing. So, obvious. Their composite is crap. No wonder you see so many stars packed together. They did a chop shop on it. They stamped in a couple of circles with stars. oooh woopie. Not even the real thing.

reply to post by Manhater


Thank you Manhater, a wonderful job.

Also thanks to the op for the beautiful picture.

Originally posted by alfa1

Originally posted by HumanCondition
Take a look for yourself.. apod.nasa.gov...

Ok, I took a look for myself and read the words

it took 11 different image fields from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) satellite's telescope to produce this gorgeous portrait

Its a composite image.

Ha, all the more conveinent when they super secret snip stuff out - they have you programmed from the start. You're already making excuses for them, when they are caught RED HANDED hiding things.

What I want to know is, just what sort of alien base they are hiding. It must BE HUGE. I mean, look at how much they've blacked out. Is it a fleet or .. an entire base?

I believe it is a base. If it was a fleet, they would have a lot more to do, but one base orbiting out there, is always going to be in one area.

THey can't fool us... They must think we're pathetic... imbeciles... retards... .. lol, no data for that region, I laugh. THey know full well whats out there. 100%... Alien base.

Discloseur is happening peoples!!!!!!

reply to post by Manhater


OMG OMG OMG OMG see Ser se seer s seria SERIOUSLY!!!!!

THey must thig we're so stupids...

OMG!!!

reply to post by HumanCondition


Typical thread from a member (one of many on here) that has a preconceived idea of what NASA does or doesn't do.

What would really help would be a real knowledge of the subject you are making a thread about but what would be even better would be reading how the images are done in the first place.

The one good thing from a thread like this is that it shows how biased against NASA they are and it shows they don't have a clue what they are talking about.

So to the OP thanks