Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

NATO declares missile shield up and running

page: 7
27
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by neo96

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by neo96
 


huh? evidence ,please.Or else its a bunch of hot air.


Yo where is your evidence eh?


----------------
Despite these differences, the aftermath and investigation of the accident had an overall warming effect on relations between the two countries. Poland felt the investigation was conducted in an open and overall fair manner in stark contrast to Russian and Soviet investigations of the past. In the aftermath of the accident Russia publicly published a large number of restricted documents on the Katyn Massacre, and declassified and published many more. Additionally, the Russian State Duma passed a resolution admitting Soviet leader Josef Stalin personally ordered the Katyn Massacre. Subsequent Katyn memorials have been joint Russian/Polish affairs attended by the leaders of both countries.

After the Polish accident report found serious deficiencies in the organization and training of the Air Force unit which operated the aircraft, the entire regiment was shut down and its aircraft retired, and several high-ranking members of the Polish military resigned under pressure. Transportation of Polish government leaders is now conducted using civilian flight crews and aircraft leased from LOT Polish Airlines.
en.wikipedia.org...
---------------
How about your evidence now?




posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:18 AM
link   
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 


If Russia doesn't fire their missiles the Missile shield just kind of sits there



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:19 AM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Dude there are so many different kinds of ABM systems that carry different payloads and operate in different attack methods. Do not even get me started on it, I have studied this topic for years.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:20 AM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


If West liked it could have easily built it.But it decided on the imperial path which will be the reason for downfall of Western civilisation.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 


Blah

A retaliatory strike is using ICBM's full nuclear and since ABMS do not carry nukes there is no point in using them

damn dude.


ABM's can easily be eqipped with neutron warheads or nuclear blast warheads for intercepting RV's.Study the Sprint or Gazelle system.



That would be a neet trick considering Carter stopped development.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:20 AM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


LOL, that is true, but Russia would not have to fire if the USA does not fire first
edit on 023131p://5America/ChicagoMon, 21 May 2012 02:21:55 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:21 AM
link   
reply to post by ludwigvonmises003
 


Citing wiki pedia as evidence?

Hardly



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:21 AM
link   
reply to post by ludwigvonmises003
 


Careful Neo.

He's quoting wikipedia...



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by neo96

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
 


Blah

A retaliatory strike is using ICBM's full nuclear and since ABMS do not carry nukes there is no point in using them

damn dude.


ABM's can easily be eqipped with neutron warheads or nuclear blast warheads for intercepting RV's.Study the Sprint or Gazelle system.



That would be a neet trick considering Carter stopped development.


Russians had done the requisite tests before the test ban treaties.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:22 AM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


and you provided no evidence.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:23 AM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


and what are you doing except stirring the troll pot?



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


Those Russian nukes are targeted at whom?

If Poland places their OWN nukes then that would be a different story, but the USA is placing its nukes there.

If Russia placed its nukes close to the USA then it would be provoking.

Poland has a right to place its own nukes ANYWHERE it wants,but it is placing US nukes. Therefore USA is provoking Russia.

edit on 013131p://5America/ChicagoMon, 21 May 2012 01:46:56 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)


Technically the warheads in Poland belong to NATO, in peacetime they are protected by a US munition support squadron, in wartime they can be dropped by polish F16s, at least that's how it works in Netherlands, Belgium and Turkey etc.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:24 AM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


The shield is nothing but bait to make Russia fight.Seems to me ,our elite wants depopulation very bad.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by neo96
 


and you provided no evidence.


Didn't see you provide any



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


and what are you doing except stirring the troll pot?


The above is trolling since it has nothing to do with the topic.

This is the topic:

NATO declares missile shield up and running



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:26 AM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Okay troll ,you have no evidence at all. Good.

Nugh said.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by neo96
 


Okay troll ,you have no evidence at all. Good.

Nugh said.


Another troll post since this is the topic

NATO declares missile shield up and running



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:27 AM
link   
It's all about beads and trinkets (that is - natural resources). U.S. strategic plan is to force Russia into two war fronts. One front is being prepared with the anti-missile shield in Europe (which is not even intended to ever become functional, but will serve the task of forcing Russia into military response), while the other front will (soon) be open with the U.S./Israeli attack on Iran.

The goal of this plan is to pull Russia into (seemingly) unwinnable situation (fighting on two major fronts) that will leave it weakened enough for subsequent (conventional) invasion and takeover (takeover of the resource-rich parts of it, at least). It's really a game of baiting a shark with your own foot.

European part of NATO is going along with the plan for several reasons:
a) Most European NATO countries have no idea that they are meant to be (literally) sacrificed to U.S. interests (it's "either us or them" game scenario in a resource-constrained environment, sometimes also described as "there are no friends when everyone is starving"),
b) They are all very well aware that complete social collapse is the most likely outcome of the present financial/economic situation, and if there's one thing wars are good for, it's to dispose of rebellious domestic populations. When power structures are pushed against a wall, war is the simplest (and most effective) of solutions.

This baiting of Russia will most certainly work (because all the moves are now being forced on everyone, the outcome is inevitable), but not in a way the U.S. expects. Pentagon planners have bit more than they can chew. They don't know it yet, because they believe that (recent) political agreement between U.S. and China (regarding the splitting of Russian spoils of war) will serve as sufficient carrot for China to:
a) Not get (too) involved in the U.S./Israeli-Iranian conflict, and
b) Not attempt a ground invasion of the U.S. while the U.S. is deploying some 95% of its military forces overseas.

But, since Pentagon is well known for having poor understanding of strategic (planetary) affairs, it doesn't realize that U.S. is actually being baited into going to a war it can never (and was never meant to) win.

(Self-)deception runs wild among all the parties involved in this (terminally deadly) folly.



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:28 AM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


The tragic plane crash that killed Polish President Kaczyński along with nearly 100 of his fellow countrymen is so far being blamed on some combination of weather, pilot error, and technical failure of the plane.

Read more: articles.businessinsider.com...

So troll where's your evidence?
edit on 21-5-2012 by ludwigvonmises003 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2012 @ 02:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by ludwigvonmises003
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


and what are you doing except stirring the troll pot?


Careful who you go around calling troll....
ludwigvonmises003
Registered: 20-8-2011





new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join