It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by EdwardKill
I didnt get past this part of your OP
This is an article in 2003 from Washington University that proves that there is no biological difference between the brains of different races.
Please tell me that this is some kind of Joke? What sort of person would even conduct tests or investigations into a subject so f**!ing ridiculous.
More to the point, were these people paid?
Last but certainly not least, are you sure that those who discovered this were not infact sharing the same brain cell?
No offence to the OP but its things like this that cause the divisions between religions, colors, languages, classes and locations.
Who ever funded this research should be questioned as to what grounds they thought the topic neccesary.
They're just contesting the number that was assigned, not the fact that she has the highest recorded IQ on various tests. Big difference
the psychologist who came up with an IQ of 228 committed an extrapolation of a misconception, thereby violating almost every rule imaginable concerning the meaning of IQs
The Mega Test has been criticized by professional psychologists as improperly designed and scored, "nothing short of number pulverization.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
actually they're arguing that the test she took to achieve the "highest recorded IQ" was flawed. both tests she took were flawed.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
marylin vos savant doesn't compare in the slightest.
oh, so the Stanford-Binet is flawed
Miss Savant was given an old version of the Stanford-Binet (Terman & Merrill 1937), which did, indeed, use the antiquated formula of MA/CA × 100. But in the test manual's norms, the Binet does not permit IQs to rise above 170 at any age, child or adult. And the authors of the old Binet stated: 'Beyond fifteen the mental ages are entirely artificial and are to be thought of as simply numerical scores.' (Terman & Merrill 1937).... the psychologist who came up with an IQ of 228 committed an extrapolation of a misconception, thereby violating almost every rule imaginable concerning the meaning of IQs.
It must be hard to be so sexist that you can't even accept basic facts. I feel for ya ...and bet you're either single or your wife is ...well....
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
my IQ is between 130-150. i did not take an online IQ test, but a professional one. the psychologist told me that since i have asperger's syndrome, a more specialized test would be needed to accurately ascertain my actual score. look up the profile of people with asperger's syndrome, and you'll find that we're strictly logical and could care less about arbitrary things like race and gender, we only care about facts and knowledge.
A new study finds that traditional intelligence testing may be underestimating the capabilities of individuals displaying an autism spectrum disorder.
Researchers discovered Asperger’s individuals’ scores are much higher when they are evaluated by a test called Raven’s Progressive Matrices, which encompasses reasoning, novel problem-solving abilities, and high-level abstraction.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by PurpleChiten
my asperger's syndrome was diagnosed a considerable period after the test, and if you actually have as much expertise as you claim, you'd know that professional IQ tests aren't cheap.
for someone with an IQ of 168 and a backround in the field, your reading comprehension is poor, and your knowledge of how IQ tests work is non existent.
A new study finds that traditional intelligence testing may be underestimating the capabilities of individuals displaying an autism spectrum disorder.
Researchers discovered Asperger’s individuals’ scores are much higher when they are evaluated by a test called Raven’s Progressive Matrices, which encompasses reasoning, novel problem-solving abilities, and high-level abstraction.
psychcentral.com...
but you'll obviously believe what you want and keep spouting the same nonsense, i feel sorry for you.
Originally posted by ArnoldNonymous
Everyone has equal brain power? Hmm and yet there still seems to be so many stupid people everywhere!
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
marylin vos savant doesn't compare in the slightest.
It must be hard to be so sexist that you can't even accept basic facts. I feel for ya ...and bet you're either single or your wife is ...well....
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
my IQ is between 130-150. i did not take an online IQ test, but a professional one. the psychologist told me that since i have asperger's syndrome, a more specialized test would be needed to accurately ascertain my actual score. look up the profile of people with asperger's syndrome, and you'll find that we're strictly logical and could care less about arbitrary things like race and gender, we only care about facts and knowledge.
I know exactly what Asperger's syndrome is, and no, not all people with Aspergers are strictly logical. Between 130 and 150?? No, if a professional gave you the test they would have been able to allow for the aspergers AND they would never, EVER give you a 20 point range so you are lying. I don't know why you're lying and don't really care, but it's a lie, nonetheless.
Mine is 168 and I was a member of MENSA until I dropped out of it due to lack of interest. I have training and education in testing and measurements so you're not going to be able to "pull one over on me" by making things up or pulling convenient factoids down from the internet. My degrees trump your wikipedia and imagination.
Save what face you can and walk away.... or keep going and deal with making a fool of yourself. The choice is yours.
Originally posted by RSF77
You two... who are in fact smarter than everyone else, but not smart enough to avoid wasting time in petty arguments and (more than likely BS) IQ pushing on an internet forum. Man all us lowly sheep are in trouble if this is the extend of a 168 IQ.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by RSF77
thankfully someone else noticed purple being hypocritical. i don't hate you purple, nor am i angry, but step back and look at what you're saying.
i don't believe i'm worth more than anyone else because of an IQ score, though there are plenty of people who do view IQ that way (the group called "mensa" for one).
perhaps my argument with purple was largely a waste of time, but inaccuracies bother me and i feel compelled to correct them.
my main point can be summed up in the statement: "different, but equal."