It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by PerfectPerception
She very well could be telling the truth
It's the hair. You can always tell by the hair. People with wild hair always tell the truth.
edit on 5/20/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
What do you think the beam of light, that originated from the craft and....shot to the ground in front of the men....might've been all about?
There is no reason to keep a fake like that alive down thru the decades. And the elements, when they are added up , give off that UFO odor.
Originally posted by PerfectPerception
reply to post by intrptr
If you are one who subscribes to either 'UFO's are man-made' or believe in a possible 'false flag alien invasion.'
Then there definitely would be reason to push an agenda. (for whatever reason)
I am undecided,still on the fence with this case,Although I do agree that Rendlesham is one of the better known cases in ufology.(If the all of the testimony is to be believed)
The agenda could be some non-human intelligence does exist/has visited or it could be that they stumbled upon something they were not supposed to see...Or were they?
Originally posted by Phage
It's the hair. You can always tell by the hair. People with wild hair always tell the truth.
Originally posted by NotReallyASecret
This is not the usual History Channel crap.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by Human_Alien
I have not watched the video yet, but, nothing is beyond speculation, or even investigation to the point of criticism where the points of criticism can outweigh any speculation for a 'positive' ufo' sighting.
I'll watch the video and perhaps add some extra thoughts to this when done.
My first, immediate criticism is: History Channel, which is already on record with the Ancient Aliens series in showing us the lengths of sensationalism and poor reporting it gives on the subject.edit on 19-5-2012 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Druscilla
I have not watched the video yet, but, nothing is beyond speculation, or even investigation to the point of criticism where the points of criticism can outweigh any speculation for a 'positive' ufo' sighting.
Originally posted by PerfectPerception
I believe you are being overly critical in this particular situation.[\quote]
Yeah, no need to be even mildly critical concerning "undebunkable" evidence of alien visitation, your correct. I apologize for my ignorance. We should accept the average internet fodder than convinces the ignorant masses that populate thisp lace and many others that "they are here"without question, right?
And you guys wonder why your the laughing stock of the internet. Wake up and grow up. The guy who posted this should know better. He either lacks the mental capacity to understand what he is posting, or has a serious mental issue and you guys are encouraging it. Sad, but 100% true. He has been around a while, and hasn't LEARNED A DARN THING. What's that tell you? Think real hard about that one.
But hey, as long as the site gets clicks, right?
And you guys wonder why your the laughing stock of the internet. Wake up and grow up. The guy who posted this should know better. He either lacks the mental capacity to understand what he is posting, or has a serious mental issue and you guys are encouraging it. Sad, but 100% true. He has been around a while, and hasn't LEARNED A DARN THING. What's that tell you? Think real hard about that one. But hey, as long as the site gets clicks, right?
Other than the Rendlesham forest case are there any other cases in ufology that intrigue you,leave you stumped?