Since Bush Is Leading In The Polls...Does This Mean We Truly Are Being Lead By The Uneducated?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-9-2004 @ 08:04 PM by Esoterica
Well, it'd be no better from a philosophical standpoint if we were lead by someone who scored abysmally in lower-educations and came through in stripes with graduates. The President is supposed to represent everybody, even the less intelligent.

For example, 80% of the US population has at least a high school education.
Source

Only around 30% graduate with college degrees (still among the highest in the world).

Source1
Source 2
Source 3

Unfortunately, I couldn't find any statistics on how many Americans have above a BS or BA, so I can't do the analysis I wanted to, so I can't actually find out how much of the nation Bush represents (if it is or is not the majority).

EDITED for cleanliness.

[edit on 9-30-2004 by Esoterica]


reply posted on 30-9-2004 @ 09:10 PM by Weller
Originally posted by Esoterica
Well, it'd be no better from a philosophical standpoint if we were lead by someone who scored abysmally in lower-educations and came through in stripes with graduates. The President is supposed to represent everybody, even the less intelligent.

For example, 80% of the US population has at least a high school education.
Source

Only around 30% graduate with college degrees (still among the highest in the world).

Source1
Source 2
Source 3

Unfortunately, I couldn't find any statistics on how many Americans have above a BS or BA, so I can't do the analysis I wanted to, so I can't actually find out how much of the nation Bush represents (if it is or is not the majority).

EDITED for cleanliness.

[edit on 9-30-2004 by Esoterica]


Yes, but it doesn't mean that the least educated approach should be used to solve problems.

"Violene is the first refuge of the incompetent."

Isaac Asimov

And so far violence in the name of fighting terror has created more terrorists, killed far more innocents than died during 9/11 and has alienated any goodwill we had in the world.

I'm not saying that fighting isn't an option at all, but the situations we face need to be dealt with equal measures of force, intelligence and cooperation. The only thing Bush has done is impose force and gotten the less thoughtful, fearful members of our country behind him to do it.

So, to me, Bush doesn't represent everyone, just the people who agree with him. He is by far the least uniting President we have ever had.

[edit on 093030p://444 by Weller]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 16 days ago with 1 member flags
A Protest Technique From Russia (Lighten up OWS)
  Posted 12 days ago with 0 member flags