It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by bacci0909
I find that interesting that a Romney supporter is the one who pushed for Rule 38, and Romney's Lawyers actually supported that new rule. Whatever happens, its going to be a wild year.
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
There are no private meetings in a public forum, so I am crashing right in and you can kiss my hiney.
He cannot win.
There you can adjourn your meeting now.
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
There are no private meetings in a public forum, so I am crashing right in and you can kiss my hiney.
He cannot win.
There you can adjourn your meeting now.
Originally posted by redrose123
reply to post by bacci0909
Adam is right about Jessee Benton. So many people have complained that are working with Ron Paul campaigned about what seems to be an objective to sabotage. Here we see what appears to be another attempt.from within the camp. Why he hasn't been removed before now is of course speculation. The movement has been working around this hurdle and moving forward. What appears to be time and time again. Yes we are awake and yes we are aware of the issues.
Revised Rule No. 15(b) as Amended by the Temporary Delegate Selection Committee Proposal Rule No. 15: Election, Selection, Allocation, or Binding of Delegates and Alternate Delegates (b) Timing. (1) No primary, caucus, or convention to elect, select, allocate, or bind delegates to the national convention shall occur prior to the first Tuesday in March in the year in which a national convention is held. Except Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada may begin their processes at any time on or after February 1 in the year in which a national convention is held and shall not be subject to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this rule. (2) Any presidential primary, caucus, convention, or other meeting held for the purpose of selecting delegates to the national convention which occurs prior to the first day of April in the year in which the national convention is held, shall provide for the allocation of delegates on a proportional basis. (3) If the Democratic National Committee fails to adhere to a presidential primary schedule with the dates set forth in Rule 15(b)(1) of these Rules (February 1 and first Tuesday in March), then Rule 15(b) shall revert to the Rules as adopted by the 2008 Republican National Convention.
ttp://www.gop.com/index.php/news/comments/republican_national_committee_approves_2012_presidential_nominating_process/#ixzz1vT8uDayP
Read more: www.gop.com...
That was ammended and accepted in 2010.
/republican_national_committee_approves_2012_presidential_nominating_process/#ixzz1vT8uDayP
Forget everything else, just read what it says. Delegates can't be bound by somebody's attempt to impose the Unit Rule. OK? Fair reading? Doesn't that imply that they can be bound in some other manner? Otherwise Rule No. 38 would just say: " No delegate or alternate delegate shall be bound."
Rule No. 38 Unit Rule
No delegate or alternate delegate shall be bound by any attempt of any state or Congressional district to impose the unit rule.
RULE NO. 15
Election, Selection, Allocation, or Binding of Delegates and Alternate Delegates
Originally posted by charles1952
I find it strange that TinfoilTP, is criticized by posters for the phrase "kiss my hiney," and not following the OP's lead. these are surely venial sins. I thought my comments were polite, reasonable, and on-topic, but they have been ignored.
I don't care about being ignored, I've walked out of a few conversations my self, but does this say anything about Ron Paul supporters? Attack all opponents, ignore those who have honest questions?
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by bacci0909
Dear bacci0909,
I owe you an apology, so I will make it. After re-reading my first post I can see where my tone was very unpleasant. I'm sorry I did that and your criticism is well deserved.
I think it may be time for the Ron Paul supporters to be left alone on the subject. Let me explain. I love my wife and see her as the most beautiful woman in the world, the delight of my heart. It would do you no good to point out to me that by the world's standards of beauty she is not even slightly attractive at all.
I mean this in a good sense. It seems that Ron Paul supporters have fallen in love, and it is folly to attempt to bring reason into love. I am happy for those of you who have found love, and will not disturb you in the future.
With respect,
Charles1952