It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
By "most part," I assume you mean at least a majority.
If you look at the US's original founding fathers, they were for the most part, not religious. They were learned men of science and history.
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
Every time this question comes up, all the same answers come up.
Simply:
--We are not willing to be force-marched into a one-world government.
--The population is not too large; the distribution system is unfairly controlled.
--"They" are not our masters, and we will not bow down. A totalitarian world government is still a totalitarian world government.
--When and if a one-world government happens organically, with the assent the world's people--fine. That's acceptable.
And so on. While you're at it, do a little more research on the founding fathers and what they were about--make that a LOT more research....
ETA: By the way: We do NOT have it all wrong.edit on 5/19/2012 by Ex_CT2 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Cassey222
You've got a lot in your OP, I'd like to ask a question about a small part of it.By "most part," I assume you mean at least a majority.
If you look at the US's original founding fathers, they were for the most part, not religious. They were learned men of science and history.
I've done a little looking and have been unable to find evidence supporting either of your statements. Why do you think they are true?