Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by intrptr

 

I thought I did...images of the naked LM, I mean.
But here's another view of the "tin foil" LM.

Thanks..I want interior pics. Are these?




I see how hard it is to dig thru archives. They list photos and you have to view each one in turn to determine if subject matter is relevant. Thanks for the link and your time.
Cool pics in here for others.
history.nasa.gov...

Why is the sky BLACK there in the daytime???? I know there is no atmosphere or whatever, but wouldn't it be more like pure white??? Black sky in day confuses me too...

reply to post by mellisamouse
It's ok; it will be all white in the morning.
That's how things worked, in the old days, now everything is made in China.

reply to post by intrptr

I want interior pics

Pretty cozy
www.ehartwell.com...

I am not sure when this documentary was produced, but it looks as old as the moon landing live broadcasts. I found this link from NASA, dated March 2012 Nasa moon rover tracks images that seem real to me. Have you seen these OP?

reply to post by stillwind


indeed, I posted the link to them in page 6 of this thread, above.....

Originally posted by Phage
Perhaps you might try a FOIA request to NASA for everything they've got about it. In any case, this may be a good jumping off point.

great Idea

Bottom of any NASA page in the fine print...
Freedom of Information Act

On that link go down to...

A link is also included to the NASA FOIA Regulations, "Availability of Agency Records to Members of the Public" which will provide you with more detailed information concerning the processing of your FOIA request.

Availability of Agency Records to Members of the Public

On that page you will see...

Subpart 3--Exemptions

And there you will see...

(b) The requirements of this part to make Agency records available do not apply to matters that are-- (1) (i) Specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (ii) Are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order;

So if there are any Aliens out there that they don't want you knowing about, or they faked a Moon Landing in the interest of 'National Security' they are under no obligation to tell you

So much for heavily blacked out FOIA information

reply to post by zorgon

muzzleflash is not looking for information about aliens or faked Moon landings.
He is looking for information about radiation studies. Let him ask. If they refuse to provide information, then you can go ahead and speculate about why it might be classified.

reply to post by Phage


Oh that radiation..

Well heck they had EM shielding for that dontchaknow? I mean I already posted that years ago
www.abovetopsecret.com...


ACTIVE SHIELDING CONCEPTS FOR THE IONIZING RADIATION IN SPACE

Much ado has been made by various groups about the radiation hazards Astronauts would face in Space

Well it may not be an issue...

Lets have a look at a NASA contractor report

Contract NASw-502 Final Report Rev. 31 Jan. 1964

Space Sciences Laboratory
Missile and Space Division
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Philadelphia, Pa.

Final Report
Contract NASw - 5 0 2
Period Covered: 1 Sept. 1962 - 31 Aug. 1963

Abstract:

Studies have been made on the problems of shielding a spacecraft from
ionizing radiation.Protons having energies between 100 and 1,000 MeV were taken as the radiation that should be excluded from the spacecraft's crew.
An electromagnetic field system using a toroidal shaped spacecraft with a
confined magnetic field is shown to be the lightest among those treated.

In general, the active shield weight is only 20% that of the passive shield
for high energy protons and for large sizes of spacecraft. The shield with a confined field weighs 30% of that for a shield using an unconfined field. If hatches are included, the use of spherical modules leads to spacecraft that are lighter than spheres, cylinders, or toruses. For spacecraft in the shape of a torus, a passively shielded hatch is not required because there are no junctions between oppositely directed magnetic fields. In that case, a spacecraft in the shape of a torus is lighter than the other shapes.

ntrs.nasa.gov...

Revised January 31, 1964


Mr Chechov! Raise Shields....

So THIS is where Gene Roddenberry got his material... Time frame is right on the mark

Originally posted by DoctorMobius
If the moan landing were a hoax the Russians would have been quite vocal about it by now, instead of congratulating NASA for it.

no they wouldn't ... who's to say they wouldn't blackmail the US gov into telling them to convert to socialism or else they will leak what they know to be true, due to their scientific findings (yes.. there are other scientists out there besides USA) ..

they got what they wanted .......which is exactly what the USA is today.. I've always woundered why the soviets and the rest of the world never went to the moon... it's because they KNOW they can't

reply to post by thegagefather


I don't believe that our government faked the moon landing, but I do believe they're holding back on information regarding UFO's and ET's, that I do Believe!

This is a repost of a comment that I made in another Apollo hoax thread which none of the moon hoax believers addressed.

Originally posted by openfire
OK, the moon hoax believers seem to all agree that the astronauts never left low earth orbit.

Doesn't this apollo-history-and-hoax.com... and this www.braeunig.us... prove otherwise?

Well?

It's stupid # like this that makes people think that other conspiracies are stupid (and also proves how stupid people really are).

What about the video that shows them fiming the earth from the back of the module with a stencel taped to the window. they were supposed to be 200,000 kms out and 2 or three days into the journey.Then you clearly see them remove the cutout from the window and they are in low earth orbit!!! so that alone was an unequivical lie. they are outright busted on film. so what else did they lie about????

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by NeverSleepingEyes

 

i can sumarise it :

the same old lies , ignorance , missrepresentation , pop psychology , psuedo science and tawddle that goes into all moon hoax ` arguments `

your name on ats summarizes "your" post,

L O L

reply to post by Elvis Hendrix

What about the video that shows them fiming the earth from the back of the module with a stencel taped to the window. they were supposed to be 200,000 kms out and 2 or three days into the journey.Then you clearly see them remove the cutout from the window and they are in low earth orbit!!! so that alone was an unequivical lie. they are outright busted on film. so what else did they lie about????

Please post a link to that video.

Il see if i can find it for you mate.

watch from about 4.50 or so its not the best quality one. but it shows the lie quite clearly.

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by Elvis Hendrix

watch from about 4.50 or so its not the best quality one. but it shows the lie quite clearly.

I don't see a stencil. In fact, as the Earth drifts out of sight, you can see it reflected on the edge of the window. It is clearly outside and very far away.

As I do quite a bit of 35mm film stills photography, I can agree with the opinions of the program about the emulsion film use on the moon, as for the rest, untill I can go to the moon myself and look and the landing sites, I will keep an open mind.