Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary

page: 35
67
<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by pfinch
reply to post by 1yearning2bfree
 

Hi I just watched the start of the video and has the guy used the camera and turned, you could see he was not standing on the durface, rather he was on tip toes. Also you see a glint vof wire holding him up

Welcome to ATS pfinch. I see this is your first post and am glad you have watched the video. It would be helpful for you to cite exactly which video you have watched and at what time signature you are talking about. I, and many others on ATS will be happy to address any questions you may have about Apollo and the space program.
edit on 6/13/2012 by Gibborium because: clarity




posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by pfinch
reply to post by 1yearning2bfree
 

Hi I just watched the start of the video and has the guy used the camera and turned, you could see he was not standing on the durface, rather he was on tip toes. Also you see a glint vof wire holding him up
Hey, Welcome to ATS , If you ever heard of the expression look ma no wires?
Well there is isn't any.But like gibbo said we will answer any questions at all you need answering.
Watch out for trolls also on here. peace.



posted on Jun, 30 2012 @ 04:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by pfinch
Hi I just watched the start of the video and has the guy used the camera and turned, you could see he was not standing on the durface, rather he was on tip toes. Also you see a glint vof wire holding him up

I recommend you to read the posts carefully before you conclude anything 'pfinch', you must be new here. Welcome to ATS
There is NO wire holding them up. First, videos have been posted here during this thread that clearly debunk the "fishing line"-wire theory... I really thought there was "fishing line"-wire attached to the astronauts as part of their training before the REAL Apollo missions to the Moon, but thanks to someone like 'denver22' who posted the videos that debunk that "Wire"-theory, i am convinced that the astronauts were NOT attached to any Wire at any time at all... Second, Moon fotos prove the astronauts were there... Third, closed minded skeptics claim that astronauts could never have travelled to the Moon because of dangerous cosmic radiation and heat from the sun, but the astronauts were in fact affected by some amount of cosmic radiaton, the astronauts also had to get used to the Earth gravity again after they returned back to Earth, some of the astronauts got ill, and some of the astronauts died of bone-cancer because they were exposed to dangerous radiation from space... Fourth, the astronauts brought back Moon rocks as prove and that's how NASA scientists also could determine the age of the Moon, the astronauts also put mirrors on Moon's surface so NASA scientist are able to determine the exact distance between Earth and Moon, and that's also how they determine that the Moon moves about 3.8 cm away from the Earth each year... Fifth, "reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 03:52 AM by Anunaki10" the Astronauts reportedly witnessed UFOs on the Moon while they walked there, and you can actually also see from this video how the Astronauts landed on the Moon,

and from about 3:30 into that video clip you can hear Neil Armstrong say >>God, what is that out there?... What the hell is that???... But this is unbelievable!



posted on Jul, 1 2012 @ 01:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anunaki10
from about 3:30 into that video clip you can hear Neil Armstrong say >>God, what is that out there?... What the hell is that???... But this is unbelievable!



posted on Jul, 7 2012 @ 08:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by intergalactic fire
Where is the proof that they did land a man on the moon?

Read the last 20 pages, and you will see posts that prove they landed on the Moon...


Why won't they go back?

They did return back to Earth


Or, do you mean why NASA stopped the Apollo missions after the last Apollo 17 flight to the Moon? It can't be because of this
Apollo 18 movie, right?
1) It's speculated that there is a good chance that the politicians decided to cut the Moon missions out of the budget, and
2) According to conspiracy theories, NASA decided to stop the Apollo missions to the Moon because of the aliens on the Moon www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

We have accumulated massive research indicating our Moon was colonized and explored by races from other planets, most notably in the Orion constellation, and that aliens called ZETANS from Zeta Reticuli are active there today. The Zetans have been analyzed by government psychologists to be, in ways, similar to Nazi scientists... technologically very advanced and materialistic, intellectual geniuses, yet lacking the kind of compassionate emotions and spiritual desires common with most people in our Earth nations. To N.A.S.A, the Pentagon, the President and his top aids... that finding is a bit too scary to put on our six o’clock television news. If you think people might PANIC, you must first realize that the military officers who have been running the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies and a Secretary of Defense already HAVE panicked. If they can do that will all their military power, where do we stand? A chance?. There is also absolute scientific proof that the Zetans have forcibly abducted thousands of Americans, many who were used in bizarre Nazi-like genetic experiments. The locals on the Moon, from Rigel, Betelguese, the Barnard Star, and a planet orbiting Sirius, most known as “grays” but not all (some are blue, Nordic blondes, or orange or even pale white), are the ALLIANCE OF THE HOLY ...their capital planet reportedly TYRANTOR. They have been involved in a star wars empire intergalactic war for at least 50,000 years, during which they invaded on conquered planets in Rigel and enslaved many people, the star wars against the Lyrans and Vegans, and against the Sirians who would not join the ALLIANCE OF SIX. Some of these star wars were fought on Earth in ancient times when colonies from different planets fought for our planet to try to take control. The Pleideans from planet Erra, humans from a spaceport on Venus, Sethians, Centaurians and beings from the reported 12th planet in our system were involved in these battles on Earth and were mostly driven off the planet (except for remaining secret underground cities and bases all of those civilizations still have on Earth). The Zetans now have a spaceport on the hidden dark side of the Moon, and many underground cities there too. They also have scientific, military, and mining stations on the surface of the Moon. So Americans and Russians can’t just fly up there and plant their flags and say, >>Hey, this is ours!



posted on Jul, 7 2012 @ 03:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
1) The film was in metal magazines. The cameras had metal bodies.

2) Only if you ignore the fact that the ground was not level.

3) The scenes don't show you the whole scene.

4) No help? Are you sure? (skip to 2:10 if you wish, but you shouldn't)


'Phage', during the last pages someone posted videos that debunk the "fishing-line" theory as you posted right there on page 5 "posted on 17-5-2012 @ 11:38 PM", but did you notice from about 2:53 into that clip were an astronaut jump up and when he landed on his feet there seems to be a "Wire" attached to his right leg just above his foot, and that "Wire" seems to go parallel to the ground like a straihgt "line"... Are you suggesting that this video you posted really are astronauts training somewhere in a Hangar in some US Air Force Base, before the REAL Apollo Moon missions?
edit on 7-7-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2012 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
Each of these lunar modules was a unique one shot, throw away type deal and yet attention to the slightest detail and the skill of the people who assembled each of these by hand, plus the subassembly contractors for all the switches, and connectors, etc. is just mind boggling. There was not a lot of redundancy nor any room for error in assembly, test or inspection of these myriad functions required to simply descend and ascend from the surface of the moon (not simple).

One loose wire jarred by launch, one moist contact deep in a switch or relay, and some critical function is the reason why the whole mission comes crashing down, so to speak. This never happened with all the LMs and that is just amazing to me. It also is indicative of the kind of well trained and highly skilled personnel back then.

Are you sure that NO LM malfunctioned? What about Apollo 13?

There is even conspiracy theory that mention a cigar shaped object following Apollo 13 on the way back to Earth... johnten.com...

Apollo: "We have company." Houston: "Say again?" Apollo: "I say we have company." (Then a short period of silence) Houston (emphatically): "You were told not to make transmissions such as that! Put it on the flight recorder and we'll discuss it when you get back!" Long period of silence. "Unless NASA was mysteriously able to produce an extra 7,935.239 lbm of fuel, the Apollo 13 would have flown into space forever. This simply calculation and our simulation indicates that NASA just didn't have enough fuel on LM decent stage for the rescue mission. Yet we know for a fact that Apollo 13 did enter into orbit around earth, de-orbited and then splashed down in Pacific Ocean. How did NASA and the Apollo 13 crew accomplished this with only 18,434.5 lbm of fuel when the listed maneuvered require 26,344.0146 lbm of fuel." "That is unless they were helped by GOD as Jerry Woodfill, Apollo 13 Warning System Engineer, stated in his article. To me GOD is only a concept in religion. Aliens are more realistic. So is it possible that the same Aliens that crippled the Apollo 13 in the first placed helped the crew get back to earth."

www.abovetopsecret.com... www.book-of-thoth.com...


Are all the LM's that went to the moon scattered around on the surface?


They did left some parts on Moon's surface, for example photos have been posted during this thread that proves that... www.abovetopsecret.com... www.nasa.gov... They even put mirrors on the surface too...
edit on 7-7-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2012 @ 08:00 PM
link   
I know, just picking one of these millions of crazy quotes isn't fair, I should make fun of them all, but I only have so much time so I picked this one...


Originally posted by Anunaki10

Q: Did our astronauts really go there? AC: I know there has been a lot of talk about this. Many of the pictures that you have seen from the surface of the moon were faked, because the actual pictures showed that there was "stuff" all over the place. *) Yes, they did go, but there was manipulation of the result involved. Morenae has told me that the United States government has 53 of its own disks stationed on the moon. *) The astronauts were told to shut up and not say anything! Morenae has told me that the gravity on the bottom of Copernicus crater is equal to that in Chicago, Illinois. Apparently, it is not the rotation of planets that creates gravity, but some aspect of solar radiation. I know this flies in the face of what you have been told, but it is a fact. Now, our moon does not turn on its axis. We always see only 59% of it. Our moon is the only one that does that.


...but there are just so many insane things about this....

Who says gravity is caused by rotation (or radiation, wtf?)? Oh, right, people who don't know the first thing about basic physics. F = G M m / r^2. It's been known for hundreds of years. No rotation there at all! No educated person has ever thought, or told anyone, gravity is caused by rotation!

The mass of the moon, and thus its gravirational strength, has been known since Newton's time, and detailed gravimetric measurements have been made: there are no parts of the moon where the gravitational force "is equal to that in Chicago, Illinois." Absolute nonsense.

The moon DOES rotate. How on Earth (haha) do you think the moon can revolve around the earth, *keeping one side facing us as it moves around us* without rotating? The moon is tidally locked to us, and lots of celestial bodies are tidally locked, thanks to basic physics.

But wait, there's more!


The depiction of NASA's view of how moon bases would look in a 1958 issue of National Geographic is in fact exactly what they actually built on the moon in February1958. When Kennedy said "we are going to send men to the moon," part of our government - the NSA - was already there. The humans on the moon are Aryans by birth, there with extraterrestrials. You can read between the lines to gauge the implications of that last statement. Now, you don't hear much about the Russian space program, but let me tell you something. They are also a major player on the moon. They don't work for us, but for the international bankers, who are the new "priesthood". According to the Andromedans, there were 9 huge domed cities on the moon on the far side, and these domes housed up to 5 million extraterrestrials at one time. There was water, vegetation and everything. These covered hundreds of square miles. When Richard Hoagland shows you pictures of the "shards" that are miles in height, he's right. There's an atmosphere on the far side of the moon. The astronauts took pictures of clouds.


Wut? Aryans only? And the Russians work for the bankers?? How does any of this make any kind of sense?

I suppose every country that's taken pictures of the moon, or sent probes to the moon is in on it, too. Tell me, who does JAXA work for? Provide me evidence that their detailed minerological studies of the far side of the moon have been faked to hide the "hundreds of square miles" cities.

Or, you know, accuse me of being a reptilian or something. (That's just what I would say if I were one of them!)



posted on Jul, 7 2012 @ 09:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Anunaki10
 


Are you sure that NO LM malfunctioned? What about Apollo 13?

I'm figuring you just got the terms mixed up.

LM stands for Lunar Module; the "spidery guy" that descends to the surface. The Command Module is the part that failed . It remains in moon orbit while the LM is on the surface. The LM worked ( as a life boat) for the return mission after the Command Module life support systems failed. They had to all fit in the LM for the ride home.

So actually no LM ever failed it's mission. Got to hand it to those assembly personnel in the factory.

www.ehartwell.com...



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 04:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Moduli
I know, just picking one of these millions of crazy quotes isn't fair, I should make fun of them all, but I only have so much time so I picked this one...

Guess what, i also have so much time to answer your obvious less serious posts...
Did you just picked one of these millions of "crazy quotes"? Come on, please tell to us all here how many millions of "crazy quotes" you know of...
To your info, just because there are millions of "crazy quotes" out there it does NOT necessarily make at least some these "crazy quotes" untrue...
Make fun of them all you say? Then why don't you make fun of them all, huh? Of course you are free to make fun of the quotes all you want for all to see here, 'Moduli'-freak...

To your info, i also posted the video of the Moon conference by "Andromedan contactee" (one of them) Alex Collier who said that he don't care whether you want to believe what 'Moranae' (the alleged commander of a different Andromeda Council flagged biosphere) told him or not... Alex Collier said that he is just telling what 'Moranae' told him, that what he said. Did you miss that part? Like he said in that video, of course it's up to you if you want to believe it or not...


Who says gravity is caused by rotation (or radiation, wtf?)? Oh, right, people who don't know the first thing about basic physics. F = G M m / r^2. It's been known for hundreds of years. No rotation there at all! No educated person has ever thought, or told anyone, gravity is caused by rotation!

'Moranae' obviously told Alex Collier about it... Or did 'Moranae' not tell Alex Collier everything? Or did Alex Collier misunderstood or overlooked something about the rotation and gravity? Who knows... en.wikipedia.org...

The gravity of Earth, denoted g, refers to the acceleration that the Earth imparts to objects on or near its surface. In SI units this acceleration is measured in metres per second per second (in symbols, m/s2 or m·s-2) or equivalently in newtons per kilogram (N/kg or N·kg-1). It has an approximate value of 9.81 m/s2, which means that, ignoring the effects of air resistance, the speed of an object falling freely near the Earth's surface will increase by about 9.81 metres (about 32.2 ft) per second every second. This quantity is sometimes referred to informally as little g (in contrast, the gravitational constant G is referred to as big G).

There is a direct relationship between gravitational acceleration and the downwards weight force experienced by objects on Earth, given by the equation F = ma (force = mass × acceleration). However, other factors such as the rotation of the Earth also contribute to the net acceleration.

Furthermore, the net force exerted on an object due to the Earth, called "effective gravity" or "apparent gravity", varies due to the presence of other factors, such as inertial response to the Earth's rotation.

You obviously overlooked something 'Moduli', as you can see for yourself it states "effective gravity" varies due to response to Earth's rotation... And as Alex Collier said, >>Apparently, it is not the rotation of planets that creates gravity, but some aspect of solar radiation. I know this flies in the FACE of what you have been told, but it is a fact.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 06:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Moduli
Aryans only?

Don't you see how foolish you make yourself look like? I recommend you to read the posts properly before you say anything... www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

The humans on the moon are Aryans by birth, there with extraterrestrials.

As you can see for yourself, Alex Collier said >>The humans on the moon are Aryans by birth, there with extraterrestrials



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 07:13 AM
link   
Wasn't this Moon Landing Hoax debunked by Mythbusters?



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 07:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Anunaki10
 


Are you sure that NO LM malfunctioned? What about Apollo 13?

I'm figuring you just got the terms mixed up.

LM stands for Lunar Module; the "spidery guy" that descends to the surface. The Command Module is the part that failed . It remains in moon orbit while the LM is on the surface. The LM worked ( as a life boat) for the return mission after the Command Module life support systems failed. They had to all fit in the LM for the ride home.

So actually no LM ever failed it's mission. Got to hand it to those assembly personnel in the factory.

www.ehartwell.com...

I know what LM stands for. That's right, it was Apollo 16 LM that was partially damaged. Thanks for the correction...
edit on 8-7-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 08:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Zeer0
Wasn't this Moon Landing Hoax debunked by Mythbusters?

Yes, The Mythbusters definitely "BUSTED" the skeptics, and thereby DEBUNKED the hoax teory... topdocumentaryfilms.com...







posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 11:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by Moduli
The moon DOES rotate. How on Earth (haha) do you think the moon can revolve around the earth, *keeping one side facing us as it moves around us* WITHOUT rotating?

First, you claim that the Moon DOES rotate, then in your next sentence you claim that the Moon does NOT rotate with your "WITHOUT rotating" claim...
So what's gonna be huh? Do you THINK the Moon ROTATE, or do you THINK that the Moon does NOT rotate?


Oops, that doesn't look too good for you, what a downer for you huh...
edit on 8-7-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anunaki10

Originally posted by Moduli
The moon DOES rotate. How on Earth (haha) do you think the moon can revolve around the earth, *keeping one side facing us as it moves around us* WITHOUT rotating?

First, you claim that the Moon DOES rotate, then in your next sentence you claim that the Moon does NOT rotate with your "WITHOUT rotating" claim...
So what's gonna be huh? Do you THINK the Moon ROTATE, or do you THINK that the Moon does NOT rotate?


Oops, that doesn't look too good for you, what a downer for you huh...
edit on 8-7-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)


That from Moduli sounds quite clear. He is saying it is rotating otherwise the same side would not always be facing Earth.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anunaki10

Originally posted by Moduli
The moon DOES rotate. How on Earth (haha) do you think the moon can revolve around the earth, *keeping one side facing us as it moves around us* WITHOUT rotating?

First, you claim that the Moon DOES rotate, then in your next sentence you claim that the Moon does NOT rotate with your "WITHOUT rotating" claim...
So what's gonna be huh? Do you THINK the Moon ROTATE, or do you THINK that the Moon does NOT rotate?


Oops, that doesn't look too good for you, what a downer for you huh...
edit on 8-7-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)


I suggest YOU re read his sentence!



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Anunaki10
I recommend you to read this www.digipro.com... "Why Doesn't the Moon Rotate?"
And as Alex Collier said >>We always see only 59% of it. Our moon is the only one that does that.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 01:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Anunaki10
 


A tidally locked body takes just as long to rotate around its own axis as it does to revolve around its partner. Therefore, the Moon rotates one revolution for every orbit around the Earth. That means it is tidally locked. Even though an observer from Earth sees only one side continually, which to us seems like it does not rotate, the moon actually rotates approximately once every 28 days. In essence, the Moon rotates, but to us on Earth we always see the same side.



posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 01:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by roadgravel
He is saying it is rotating otherwise the same side would not always be facing Earth.

Nope, you're incorrect, 'Moduli' didn't say what you just say there... But, 'Moduli' said >>The moon DOES rotate





new topics

top topics



 
67
<< 32  33  34    36  37  38 >>

log in

join