It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TruthExposed
York rite has 7 degrees and is another branch you can proceed to after your third, but is completely seperate from the scottish rite, and the degrees shouldn't be considered "ranks" I'm told. While you must be mason to join either rite, they are seperate from one another.
Say an south african passes all your checks and grips and whatnot and knows precisely what you know - but you find out he's a member of Prince Hall or simply from a foreign lodge that doesn't report to the same people you do - aren't you supposed to halt all masonic communication at that point?
Originally posted by Pinocchio
What matters more to a Freemason... Is it the Tool(s) or the regalia or the Emblem(s)???
Originally posted by osbornegg
The Scottish Rite, at leat in the US, is the brain child of one Albert Pike...
Originally posted by TruthExposed
REGARDLESS of what the lodge changes, the vow to God made this hypothetical Christian take seems rather binding, thus tying his hands to ever treat a woman or clandestine as an equal.
Originally posted by W3RLIED2
[
Well since freemasonry wasn't around until the 1500s, and had no Grand Lodges before 1717' I'd imagine we missed the cut for making it into the bible.
Our allegories and lessons, as well as ( some one correct me if I'm wrong please) all of the ritual of blue lodge is entirely based on the stories found in the bible.
Originally posted by TruthExposed
And if the organization adheres to the same landmarks? And are you SERIOUSLY trying to deny your political nature?
Originally posted by TruthExposed
Christians can certainly share fellowship with other Christians, regardless of where you got to church..... ... ...Masons can only share masonic fellowship if they belong to the same organization, again due to politics.
Originally posted by TruthExposed
Your very thorough obligation contains the word "clandestine" - now look in your published monitor/manuscript as to YOUR lodges definition of the word.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
I was the Master of my Lodge when I hadn't even returned the FC or MM catechisms, yet I was a Worshipful Master due to lack of interest and my ability as a quickstudy and sucker for punishment.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by network dude
If there really are things in the work that are supposed to communicate things which cannot be taught as This site proposes, then my Lodge is missing the whole point of it. We just got our checkered floor and tessalated border last year after being chartered for more than 50 years!
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Don't take it personally, in my jurisdiction Prince Hall is still clandestine.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by W3RLIED2
[
Well since freemasonry wasn't around until the 1500s, and had no Grand Lodges before 1717' I'd imagine we missed the cut for making it into the bible.
Our allegories and lessons, as well as ( some one correct me if I'm wrong please) all of the ritual of blue lodge is entirely based on the stories found in the bible.
Thanks your reply.
It is my understanding that George Washington was 33rd degree and many Presidents use the masonic Bible while being sworn in as the President. Does that mean the the President in question is a free mason.
Am curious how does the masonic Bible differ from say the kjv.
Originally posted by network dude
Only 14 presidents have been masons with Gerald Ford being thelastmost recent one.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
It is my understanding that George Washington was 33rd degree...
...and many Presidents use the masonic Bible while being sworn in as the President. Does that mean the the President in question is a free mason.
Am curious how does the masonic Bible differ from say the kjv.
Originally posted by osbornegg
For example the posture of the candidate before the altar in the Blue Lodge when sworn into one of the first three degrees is actually the posture assumed at a Christain altar for ordination as a deacon, priest or bishop in the early, un-divided Church...everything from the position of the legs to the position of the hands and how the "holy book" is held.